All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com>
To: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86/sgx: Replace section->init_laundry_list with sgx_dirty_page_list
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 01:53:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210317235332.362001-1-jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com> (raw)

From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>

During normal runtime, the "ksgxd" daemon behaves like a  version of
kswapd just for SGX.  But, before it starts acting like kswapd, its
first job is to initialize enclave memory.

Currently, the SGX boot code places each enclave page on a
epc_section->init_laundry_list.  Once it starts up, the ksgxd code walks
over that list and populates the actual SGX page allocator.

However, the per-section structures are going away to make way for the SGX
NUMA allocator.  There's also little need to have a per-section structure;
the enclave pages are all treated identically, and they can be placed on
the correct allocator list from metadata stored in the enclave page
(struct sgx_epc_page) itself.

Modify sgx_sanitize_section() to take a single page list instead of taking
a section and deriving the list from there.

Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
---

v5
* Refine the commit message.
* Refine inline comments.
* Encapsulate a sanitization pass into __sgx_sanitize_pages().

v4:
* Open coded sgx_santize_section() to ksgxd().
* Rewrote the commit message.

 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++------------------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h  |  7 -----
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
index 8df81a3ed945..f3a5cd2d27ef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
@@ -26,39 +26,43 @@ static LIST_HEAD(sgx_active_page_list);
 
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sgx_reclaimer_lock);
 
+static LIST_HEAD(sgx_dirty_page_list);
+
 /*
- * Reset dirty EPC pages to uninitialized state. Laundry can be left with SECS
- * pages whose child pages blocked EREMOVE.
+ * Reset post-kexec EPC pages to the uninitialized state. The pages are removed
+ * from the input list, and made available for the page allocator. SECS pages
+ * prepending their children in the input list are left intact.
  */
-static void sgx_sanitize_section(struct sgx_epc_section *section)
+static void __sgx_sanitize_pages(struct list_head *dirty_page_list)
 {
 	struct sgx_epc_page *page;
 	LIST_HEAD(dirty);
 	int ret;
 
-	/* init_laundry_list is thread-local, no need for a lock: */
-	while (!list_empty(&section->init_laundry_list)) {
+	/* dirty_page_list is thread-local, no need for a lock: */
+	while (!list_empty(dirty_page_list)) {
 		if (kthread_should_stop())
 			return;
 
-		/* needed for access to ->page_list: */
-		spin_lock(&section->lock);
-
-		page = list_first_entry(&section->init_laundry_list,
-					struct sgx_epc_page, list);
+		page = list_first_entry(dirty_page_list, struct sgx_epc_page, list);
 
 		ret = __eremove(sgx_get_epc_virt_addr(page));
-		if (!ret)
-			list_move(&page->list, &section->page_list);
-		else
+		if (!ret) {
+			/*
+			 * page is now sanitized.  Make it available via the SGX
+			 * page allocator:
+			 */
+			list_del(&page->list);
+			sgx_free_epc_page(page);
+		} else {
+			/* The page is not yet clean - move to the dirty list. */
 			list_move_tail(&page->list, &dirty);
-
-		spin_unlock(&section->lock);
+		}
 
 		cond_resched();
 	}
 
-	list_splice(&dirty, &section->init_laundry_list);
+	list_splice(&dirty, dirty_page_list);
 }
 
 static bool sgx_reclaimer_age(struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page)
@@ -405,24 +409,17 @@ static bool sgx_should_reclaim(unsigned long watermark)
 
 static int ksgxd(void *p)
 {
-	int i;
-
 	set_freezable();
 
 	/*
 	 * Sanitize pages in order to recover from kexec(). The 2nd pass is
 	 * required for SECS pages, whose child pages blocked EREMOVE.
 	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < sgx_nr_epc_sections; i++)
-		sgx_sanitize_section(&sgx_epc_sections[i]);
-
-	for (i = 0; i < sgx_nr_epc_sections; i++) {
-		sgx_sanitize_section(&sgx_epc_sections[i]);
+	__sgx_sanitize_pages(&sgx_dirty_page_list);
+	__sgx_sanitize_pages(&sgx_dirty_page_list);
 
-		/* Should never happen. */
-		if (!list_empty(&sgx_epc_sections[i].init_laundry_list))
-			WARN(1, "EPC section %d has unsanitized pages.\n", i);
-	}
+	/* sanity check: */
+	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&sgx_dirty_page_list));
 
 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
 		if (try_to_freeze())
@@ -637,13 +634,12 @@ static bool __init sgx_setup_epc_section(u64 phys_addr, u64 size,
 	section->phys_addr = phys_addr;
 	spin_lock_init(&section->lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&section->page_list);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&section->init_laundry_list);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
 		section->pages[i].section = index;
 		section->pages[i].flags = 0;
 		section->pages[i].owner = NULL;
-		list_add_tail(&section->pages[i].list, &section->init_laundry_list);
+		list_add_tail(&section->pages[i].list, &sgx_dirty_page_list);
 	}
 
 	section->free_cnt = nr_pages;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
index 5fa42d143feb..bc8af0428640 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
@@ -45,13 +45,6 @@ struct sgx_epc_section {
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	struct list_head page_list;
 	unsigned long free_cnt;
-
-	/*
-	 * Pages which need EREMOVE run on them before they can be
-	 * used.  Only safe to be accessed in ksgxd and init code.
-	 * Not protected by locks.
-	 */
-	struct list_head init_laundry_list;
 };
 
 extern struct sgx_epc_section sgx_epc_sections[SGX_MAX_EPC_SECTIONS];
-- 
2.31.0


             reply	other threads:[~2021-03-17 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-17 23:53 Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2021-03-17 23:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/sgx: Add a basic NUMA allocation scheme to sgx_alloc_epc_page() Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-03-18 19:05   ` [tip: x86/sgx] " tip-bot2 for Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-03-19  8:57   ` tip-bot2 for Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-03-18 17:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/sgx: Replace section->init_laundry_list with sgx_dirty_page_list Borislav Petkov
2021-03-18 18:34   ` Dave Hansen
2021-03-18 19:01     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-18 19:28       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-03-18 19:05 ` [tip: x86/sgx] " tip-bot2 for Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210317235332.362001-1-jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.