All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Stop reporting SW_DOCK events
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 17:35:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210321163513.72328-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)

Stop reporting SW_DOCK events because this breaks suspend-on-lid-close.

SW_DOCK should only be reported for docking stations, but all the DSDTs in
my DSDT collection which use the intel-vbtn code, always seem to use this
for 2-in-1s / convertibles and set SW_DOCK=1 when in laptop-mode (in tandem
with setting SW_TABLET_MODE=0).

This causes userspace to think the laptop is docked to a port-replicator
and to disable suspend-on-lid-close, which is undesirable.

Map the dock events to KEY_IGNORE to avoid this broken SW_DOCK reporting.

Note this may theoretically cause us to stop reporting SW_DOCK on some
device where the 0xCA and 0xCB intel-vbtn events are actually used for
reporting docking to a classic docking-station / port-replicator but
I'm not aware of any such devices.

Also the most important thing is that we only report SW_DOCK when it
reliably reports being docked to a classic docking-station without any
false positives, which clearly is not the case here. If there is a
chance of reporting false positives then it is better to not report
SW_DOCK at all.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c
index 8a8017f9ca91..3fdf4cbec9ad 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c
@@ -48,8 +48,16 @@ static const struct key_entry intel_vbtn_keymap[] = {
 };
 
 static const struct key_entry intel_vbtn_switchmap[] = {
-	{ KE_SW,     0xCA, { .sw = { SW_DOCK, 1 } } },		/* Docked */
-	{ KE_SW,     0xCB, { .sw = { SW_DOCK, 0 } } },		/* Undocked */
+	/*
+	 * SW_DOCK should only be reported for docking stations, but DSDTs using the
+	 * intel-vbtn code, always seem to use this for 2-in-1s / convertibles and set
+	 * SW_DOCK=1 when in laptop-mode (in tandem with setting SW_TABLET_MODE=0).
+	 * This causes userspace to think the laptop is docked to a port-replicator
+	 * and to disable suspend-on-lid-close, which is undesirable.
+	 * Map the dock events to KEY_IGNORE to avoid this broken SW_DOCK reporting.
+	 */
+	{ KE_IGNORE, 0xCA, { .sw = { SW_DOCK, 1 } } },		/* Docked */
+	{ KE_IGNORE, 0xCB, { .sw = { SW_DOCK, 0 } } },		/* Undocked */
 	{ KE_SW,     0xCC, { .sw = { SW_TABLET_MODE, 1 } } },	/* Tablet */
 	{ KE_SW,     0xCD, { .sw = { SW_TABLET_MODE, 0 } } },	/* Laptop */
 	{ KE_END }
-- 
2.30.2


             reply	other threads:[~2021-03-21 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-21 16:35 Hans de Goede [this message]
2021-03-21 16:45 ` [PATCH] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Stop reporting SW_DOCK events Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210321163513.72328-1-hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.