From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [PATCH v9 17/70] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:50:06 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210323155059.628690-18-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210323155059.628690-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> With userptr fixed, there is no need for all separate lockdep classes now, and we can remove all lockdep tricks used. A trylock in the shrinker is all we need now to flatten the locking hierarchy. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c | 5 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 20 ++---------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 34 ++++++++++---------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 10 +++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c | 2 +- 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c index 6083b9c14be6..821cb40f8d73 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ void i915_gem_object_init(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, const struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops *ops, struct lock_class_key *key, unsigned flags) { - __mutex_init(&obj->mm.lock, ops->name ?: "obj->mm.lock", key); + mutex_init(&obj->mm.lock); spin_lock_init(&obj->vma.lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj->vma.list); @@ -86,9 +86,6 @@ void i915_gem_object_init(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, mutex_init(&obj->mm.get_page.lock); INIT_RADIX_TREE(&obj->mm.get_dma_page.radix, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN); mutex_init(&obj->mm.get_dma_page.lock); - - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) && i915_gem_object_is_shrinkable(obj)) - fs_reclaim_taints_mutex(&obj->mm.lock); } /** diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h index b5af9c440ac5..a0e1c4ff0de4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h @@ -372,27 +372,10 @@ void __i915_gem_object_set_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int ____i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj); int __i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj); -enum i915_mm_subclass { /* lockdep subclass for obj->mm.lock/struct_mutex */ - I915_MM_NORMAL = 0, - /* - * Only used by struct_mutex, when called "recursively" from - * direct-reclaim-esque. Safe because there is only every one - * struct_mutex in the entire system. - */ - I915_MM_SHRINKER = 1, - /* - * Used for obj->mm.lock when allocating pages. Safe because the object - * isn't yet on any LRU, and therefore the shrinker can't deadlock on - * it. As soon as the object has pages, obj->mm.lock nests within - * fs_reclaim. - */ - I915_MM_GET_PAGES = 1, -}; - static inline int __must_check i915_gem_object_pin_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) { - might_lock_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES); + might_lock(&obj->mm.lock); if (atomic_inc_not_zero(&obj->mm.pages_pin_count)) return 0; @@ -436,6 +419,7 @@ i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) } int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj); +int __i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj); void i915_gem_object_truncate(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj); void i915_gem_object_writeback(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c index e7d7650072c5..e947d4c0da1f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ int __i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) { int err; - err = mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES); + err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&obj->mm.lock); if (err) return err; @@ -196,21 +196,13 @@ __i915_gem_object_unset_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) return pages; } -int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) +int __i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) { struct sg_table *pages; - int err; if (i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj)) return -EBUSY; - /* May be called by shrinker from within get_pages() (on another bo) */ - mutex_lock(&obj->mm.lock); - if (unlikely(atomic_read(&obj->mm.pages_pin_count))) { - err = -EBUSY; - goto unlock; - } - i915_gem_object_release_mmap_offset(obj); /* @@ -226,14 +218,22 @@ int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) * get_pages backends we should be better able to handle the * cancellation of the async task in a more uniform manner. */ - if (!pages) - pages = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); - - if (!IS_ERR(pages)) + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pages)) obj->ops->put_pages(obj, pages); - err = 0; -unlock: + return 0; +} + +int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) +{ + int err; + + if (i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj)) + return -EBUSY; + + /* May be called by shrinker from within get_pages() (on another bo) */ + mutex_lock(&obj->mm.lock); + err = __i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(obj); mutex_unlock(&obj->mm.lock); return err; @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ void *i915_gem_object_pin_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, !i915_gem_object_type_has(obj, I915_GEM_OBJECT_HAS_IOMEM)) return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO); - err = mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES); + err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&obj->mm.lock); if (err) return ERR_PTR(err); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c index 06c481ff79d8..44329c435cf1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ int i915_gem_object_attach_phys(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int align) if (err) return err; - err = mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES); + err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&obj->mm.lock); if (err) goto err_unlock; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c index b64a0788381f..3052ef5ad89d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c @@ -49,9 +49,9 @@ static bool unsafe_drop_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, flags = I915_GEM_OBJECT_UNBIND_TEST; if (i915_gem_object_unbind(obj, flags) == 0) - __i915_gem_object_put_pages(obj); + return true; - return !i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj); + return false; } static void try_to_writeback(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, @@ -200,10 +200,10 @@ i915_gem_shrink(struct drm_i915_private *i915, spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i915->mm.obj_lock, flags); - if (unsafe_drop_pages(obj, shrink)) { + if (unsafe_drop_pages(obj, shrink) && + mutex_trylock(&obj->mm.lock)) { /* May arrive from get_pages on another bo */ - mutex_lock(&obj->mm.lock); - if (!i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj)) { + if (!__i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(obj)) { try_to_writeback(obj, shrink); count += obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c index 1e42fbc68697..503325e74eff 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static int i915_gem_object_userptr_unbind(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool if (GEM_WARN_ON(i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj))) return -EBUSY; - mutex_lock_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES); + mutex_lock(&obj->mm.lock); pages = __i915_gem_object_unset_pages(obj); if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pages)) -- 2.31.0 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 17/70] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:50:06 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210323155059.628690-18-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210323155059.628690-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> With userptr fixed, there is no need for all separate lockdep classes now, and we can remove all lockdep tricks used. A trylock in the shrinker is all we need now to flatten the locking hierarchy. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c | 5 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 20 ++---------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 34 ++++++++++---------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 10 +++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c | 2 +- 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c index 6083b9c14be6..821cb40f8d73 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ void i915_gem_object_init(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, const struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops *ops, struct lock_class_key *key, unsigned flags) { - __mutex_init(&obj->mm.lock, ops->name ?: "obj->mm.lock", key); + mutex_init(&obj->mm.lock); spin_lock_init(&obj->vma.lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj->vma.list); @@ -86,9 +86,6 @@ void i915_gem_object_init(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, mutex_init(&obj->mm.get_page.lock); INIT_RADIX_TREE(&obj->mm.get_dma_page.radix, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN); mutex_init(&obj->mm.get_dma_page.lock); - - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) && i915_gem_object_is_shrinkable(obj)) - fs_reclaim_taints_mutex(&obj->mm.lock); } /** diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h index b5af9c440ac5..a0e1c4ff0de4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h @@ -372,27 +372,10 @@ void __i915_gem_object_set_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int ____i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj); int __i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj); -enum i915_mm_subclass { /* lockdep subclass for obj->mm.lock/struct_mutex */ - I915_MM_NORMAL = 0, - /* - * Only used by struct_mutex, when called "recursively" from - * direct-reclaim-esque. Safe because there is only every one - * struct_mutex in the entire system. - */ - I915_MM_SHRINKER = 1, - /* - * Used for obj->mm.lock when allocating pages. Safe because the object - * isn't yet on any LRU, and therefore the shrinker can't deadlock on - * it. As soon as the object has pages, obj->mm.lock nests within - * fs_reclaim. - */ - I915_MM_GET_PAGES = 1, -}; - static inline int __must_check i915_gem_object_pin_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) { - might_lock_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES); + might_lock(&obj->mm.lock); if (atomic_inc_not_zero(&obj->mm.pages_pin_count)) return 0; @@ -436,6 +419,7 @@ i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) } int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj); +int __i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj); void i915_gem_object_truncate(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj); void i915_gem_object_writeback(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c index e7d7650072c5..e947d4c0da1f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ int __i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) { int err; - err = mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES); + err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&obj->mm.lock); if (err) return err; @@ -196,21 +196,13 @@ __i915_gem_object_unset_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) return pages; } -int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) +int __i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) { struct sg_table *pages; - int err; if (i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj)) return -EBUSY; - /* May be called by shrinker from within get_pages() (on another bo) */ - mutex_lock(&obj->mm.lock); - if (unlikely(atomic_read(&obj->mm.pages_pin_count))) { - err = -EBUSY; - goto unlock; - } - i915_gem_object_release_mmap_offset(obj); /* @@ -226,14 +218,22 @@ int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) * get_pages backends we should be better able to handle the * cancellation of the async task in a more uniform manner. */ - if (!pages) - pages = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); - - if (!IS_ERR(pages)) + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pages)) obj->ops->put_pages(obj, pages); - err = 0; -unlock: + return 0; +} + +int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) +{ + int err; + + if (i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj)) + return -EBUSY; + + /* May be called by shrinker from within get_pages() (on another bo) */ + mutex_lock(&obj->mm.lock); + err = __i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(obj); mutex_unlock(&obj->mm.lock); return err; @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ void *i915_gem_object_pin_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, !i915_gem_object_type_has(obj, I915_GEM_OBJECT_HAS_IOMEM)) return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO); - err = mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES); + err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&obj->mm.lock); if (err) return ERR_PTR(err); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c index 06c481ff79d8..44329c435cf1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ int i915_gem_object_attach_phys(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int align) if (err) return err; - err = mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES); + err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&obj->mm.lock); if (err) goto err_unlock; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c index b64a0788381f..3052ef5ad89d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c @@ -49,9 +49,9 @@ static bool unsafe_drop_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, flags = I915_GEM_OBJECT_UNBIND_TEST; if (i915_gem_object_unbind(obj, flags) == 0) - __i915_gem_object_put_pages(obj); + return true; - return !i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj); + return false; } static void try_to_writeback(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, @@ -200,10 +200,10 @@ i915_gem_shrink(struct drm_i915_private *i915, spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i915->mm.obj_lock, flags); - if (unsafe_drop_pages(obj, shrink)) { + if (unsafe_drop_pages(obj, shrink) && + mutex_trylock(&obj->mm.lock)) { /* May arrive from get_pages on another bo */ - mutex_lock(&obj->mm.lock); - if (!i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj)) { + if (!__i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(obj)) { try_to_writeback(obj, shrink); count += obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c index 1e42fbc68697..503325e74eff 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static int i915_gem_object_userptr_unbind(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool if (GEM_WARN_ON(i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj))) return -EBUSY; - mutex_lock_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES); + mutex_lock(&obj->mm.lock); pages = __i915_gem_object_unset_pages(obj); if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pages)) -- 2.31.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-23 15:57 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 207+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-03-23 15:49 [PATCH v9 00/70] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 01/70] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v8 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 02/70] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin, v4 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 03/70] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 04/70] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning, v2 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 05/70] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 06/70] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 07/70] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 08/70] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 09/70] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 10/70] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 11/70] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 13:57 ` Jason Ekstrand 2021-03-24 13:57 ` Jason Ekstrand 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 12/70] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 13/70] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr, v2 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 14/70] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 15/70] drm/i915: Make compilation of userptr code depend on MMU_NOTIFIER Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 16/70] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v7 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 11:28 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 11:28 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 11:34 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel) 2021-03-24 11:34 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel) 2021-03-25 9:23 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v8 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-25 9:23 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-25 9:55 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel) 2021-03-25 9:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström (Intel) 2021-03-25 10:27 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-25 10:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message] 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 17/70] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 11:13 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 11:13 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 18/70] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 19/70] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 20/70] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 21/70] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 22/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 23/70] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 24/70] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 25/70] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 12:35 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 12:35 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 26/70] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v3 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 27/70] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 12:37 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 12:37 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 28/70] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 14:12 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 14:12 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 29/70] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 30/70] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 14:45 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 14:45 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 31/70] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 16:16 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 16:16 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 32/70] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 16:18 ` Matthew Auld 2021-03-23 16:18 ` Matthew Auld 2021-03-23 20:25 ` Thomas Hellström 2021-03-23 20:25 ` Thomas Hellström 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 33/70] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 34/70] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 16:21 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 16:21 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 35/70] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 36/70] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 37/70] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops, v2 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 38/70] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 39/70] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 40/70] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 41/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 42/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 43/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 44/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 16:40 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 16:40 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 45/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 46/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 47/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 48/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 49/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 50/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 51/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 52/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 53/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists and lrc selftests " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 54/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 55/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 56/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 57/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 58/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 59/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 60/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 61/70] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 62/70] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged, v2 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 63/70] drm/i915: Move gt_revoke() slightly Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 17:00 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 17:00 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 17:15 ` Ville Syrjälä 2021-03-24 17:15 ` Ville Syrjälä 2021-03-24 17:16 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 17:16 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 17:58 ` Ville Syrjälä 2021-03-24 17:58 ` Ville Syrjälä 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 64/70] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK path in execbuffer ggtt pinning Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 17:05 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 17:05 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 65/70] drm/i915: Fix pin_map in scheduler selftests Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 17:14 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 17:14 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 66/70] drm/i915: Add ww parameter to get_pages() callback Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 17:20 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 17:20 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 67/70] drm/i915: Add ww context to prepare_(read/write) Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 68/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 17:30 ` Matthew Auld 2021-03-23 17:30 ` Matthew Auld 2021-03-24 9:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 9:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 10:11 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 10:11 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 11:54 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map, v2 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 11:54 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 69/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to i915_gem_object_pin_pages Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 70/70] drm/i915: Remove asynchronous vma binding Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 17:19 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 17:19 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev18) Patchwork 2021-03-23 16:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork 2021-03-23 16:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork 2021-03-23 16:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork 2021-03-24 12:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev19) Patchwork 2021-03-24 12:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork 2021-03-24 12:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork 2021-03-24 13:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork 2021-03-25 21:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev20) Patchwork
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210323155059.628690-18-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \ --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.