All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 26/70] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v3.
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:50:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210323155059.628690-27-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210323155059.628690-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

Make creation separate from pinning, in order to take the lock only
once, and pin the mapping with the lock held.

Changes since v1:
- Rebase on top of upstream changes.
Changes since v2:
- Fully clear wa_ctx on error.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 8508b8d701c1..a2b916d27a39 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ gen10_init_indirectctx_bb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 *batch)
 
 #define CTX_WA_BB_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE)
 
-static int lrc_setup_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+static int lrc_create_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
 	struct i915_vma *vma;
@@ -1437,10 +1437,6 @@ static int lrc_setup_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		goto err;
 	}
 
-	err = i915_ggtt_pin(vma, NULL, 0, PIN_HIGH);
-	if (err)
-		goto err;
-
 	engine->wa_ctx.vma = vma;
 	return 0;
 
@@ -1452,9 +1448,6 @@ static int lrc_setup_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 void lrc_fini_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
 	i915_vma_unpin_and_release(&engine->wa_ctx.vma, 0);
-
-	/* Called on error unwind, clear all flags to prevent further use */
-	memset(&engine->wa_ctx, 0, sizeof(engine->wa_ctx));
 }
 
 typedef u32 *(*wa_bb_func_t)(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 *batch);
@@ -1466,6 +1459,7 @@ void lrc_init_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		&wa_ctx->indirect_ctx, &wa_ctx->per_ctx
 	};
 	wa_bb_func_t wa_bb_fn[ARRAY_SIZE(wa_bb)];
+	struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
 	void *batch, *batch_ptr;
 	unsigned int i;
 	int err;
@@ -1494,7 +1488,7 @@ void lrc_init_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	err = lrc_setup_wa_ctx(engine);
+	err = lrc_create_wa_ctx(engine);
 	if (err) {
 		/*
 		 * We continue even if we fail to initialize WA batch
@@ -1507,7 +1501,22 @@ void lrc_init_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	if (!engine->wa_ctx.vma)
+		return;
+
+	i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, true);
+retry:
+	err = i915_gem_object_lock(wa_ctx->vma->obj, &ww);
+	if (!err)
+		err = i915_ggtt_pin(wa_ctx->vma, &ww, 0, PIN_HIGH);
+	if (err)
+		goto err;
+
 	batch = i915_gem_object_pin_map(wa_ctx->vma->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
+	if (IS_ERR(batch)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(batch);
+		goto err_unpin;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Emit the two workaround batch buffers, recording the offset from the
@@ -1532,8 +1541,26 @@ void lrc_init_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	__i915_gem_object_release_map(wa_ctx->vma->obj);
 
 	/* Verify that we can handle failure to setup the wa_ctx */
-	if (err || i915_inject_probe_error(engine->i915, -ENODEV))
-		lrc_fini_wa_ctx(engine);
+	if (!err)
+		err = i915_inject_probe_error(engine->i915, -ENODEV);
+
+err_unpin:
+	if (err)
+		i915_vma_unpin(wa_ctx->vma);
+err:
+	if (err == -EDEADLK) {
+		err = i915_gem_ww_ctx_backoff(&ww);
+		if (!err)
+			goto retry;
+	}
+	i915_gem_ww_ctx_fini(&ww);
+
+	if (err) {
+		i915_vma_put(engine->wa_ctx.vma);
+
+		/* Clear all flags to prevent further use */
+		memset(wa_ctx, 0, sizeof(*wa_ctx));
+	}
 }
 
 static void st_runtime_underflow(struct intel_context_stats *stats, s32 dt)
-- 
2.31.0

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 26/70] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v3.
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:50:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210323155059.628690-27-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210323155059.628690-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

Make creation separate from pinning, in order to take the lock only
once, and pin the mapping with the lock held.

Changes since v1:
- Rebase on top of upstream changes.
Changes since v2:
- Fully clear wa_ctx on error.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 8508b8d701c1..a2b916d27a39 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ gen10_init_indirectctx_bb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 *batch)
 
 #define CTX_WA_BB_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE)
 
-static int lrc_setup_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+static int lrc_create_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
 	struct i915_vma *vma;
@@ -1437,10 +1437,6 @@ static int lrc_setup_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		goto err;
 	}
 
-	err = i915_ggtt_pin(vma, NULL, 0, PIN_HIGH);
-	if (err)
-		goto err;
-
 	engine->wa_ctx.vma = vma;
 	return 0;
 
@@ -1452,9 +1448,6 @@ static int lrc_setup_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 void lrc_fini_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
 	i915_vma_unpin_and_release(&engine->wa_ctx.vma, 0);
-
-	/* Called on error unwind, clear all flags to prevent further use */
-	memset(&engine->wa_ctx, 0, sizeof(engine->wa_ctx));
 }
 
 typedef u32 *(*wa_bb_func_t)(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 *batch);
@@ -1466,6 +1459,7 @@ void lrc_init_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		&wa_ctx->indirect_ctx, &wa_ctx->per_ctx
 	};
 	wa_bb_func_t wa_bb_fn[ARRAY_SIZE(wa_bb)];
+	struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
 	void *batch, *batch_ptr;
 	unsigned int i;
 	int err;
@@ -1494,7 +1488,7 @@ void lrc_init_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	err = lrc_setup_wa_ctx(engine);
+	err = lrc_create_wa_ctx(engine);
 	if (err) {
 		/*
 		 * We continue even if we fail to initialize WA batch
@@ -1507,7 +1501,22 @@ void lrc_init_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	if (!engine->wa_ctx.vma)
+		return;
+
+	i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, true);
+retry:
+	err = i915_gem_object_lock(wa_ctx->vma->obj, &ww);
+	if (!err)
+		err = i915_ggtt_pin(wa_ctx->vma, &ww, 0, PIN_HIGH);
+	if (err)
+		goto err;
+
 	batch = i915_gem_object_pin_map(wa_ctx->vma->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
+	if (IS_ERR(batch)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(batch);
+		goto err_unpin;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Emit the two workaround batch buffers, recording the offset from the
@@ -1532,8 +1541,26 @@ void lrc_init_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	__i915_gem_object_release_map(wa_ctx->vma->obj);
 
 	/* Verify that we can handle failure to setup the wa_ctx */
-	if (err || i915_inject_probe_error(engine->i915, -ENODEV))
-		lrc_fini_wa_ctx(engine);
+	if (!err)
+		err = i915_inject_probe_error(engine->i915, -ENODEV);
+
+err_unpin:
+	if (err)
+		i915_vma_unpin(wa_ctx->vma);
+err:
+	if (err == -EDEADLK) {
+		err = i915_gem_ww_ctx_backoff(&ww);
+		if (!err)
+			goto retry;
+	}
+	i915_gem_ww_ctx_fini(&ww);
+
+	if (err) {
+		i915_vma_put(engine->wa_ctx.vma);
+
+		/* Clear all flags to prevent further use */
+		memset(wa_ctx, 0, sizeof(*wa_ctx));
+	}
 }
 
 static void st_runtime_underflow(struct intel_context_stats *stats, s32 dt)
-- 
2.31.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-23 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 207+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-23 15:49 [PATCH v9 00/70] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 01/70] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v8 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 02/70] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin, v4 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 03/70] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 04/70] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 05/70] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 06/70] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 07/70] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 08/70] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 09/70] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 10/70] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 11/70] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 13:57   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-24 13:57     ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 12/70] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 13/70] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 14/70] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 15/70] drm/i915: Make compilation of userptr code depend on MMU_NOTIFIER Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 16/70] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v7 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 11:28   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 11:28     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 11:34     ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-24 11:34       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-25  9:23       ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v8 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-25  9:23         ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-25  9:55         ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-25  9:55           ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-25 10:27           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-25 10:27             ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 17/70] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 11:13   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 11:13     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 18/70] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 19/70] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 20/70] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 21/70] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 22/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 23/70] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 24/70] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 25/70] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 12:35   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 12:35     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 26/70] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 27/70] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 12:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 12:37     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 28/70] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 14:12   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 14:12     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 29/70] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 30/70] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 14:45   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 14:45     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 31/70] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:16   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 16:16     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 32/70] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 16:18   ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-23 16:18     ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-23 20:25     ` Thomas Hellström
2021-03-23 20:25       ` Thomas Hellström
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 33/70] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 34/70] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:21   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 16:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 35/70] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 36/70] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 37/70] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 38/70] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 39/70] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 40/70] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 41/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 42/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 43/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 44/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:40   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 16:40     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 45/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 46/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 47/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 48/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 49/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 50/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 51/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 52/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 53/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists and lrc selftests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 54/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 55/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 56/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 57/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 58/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 59/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 60/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 61/70] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 62/70] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 63/70] drm/i915: Move gt_revoke() slightly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:00   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:00     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:15     ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-24 17:15       ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-24 17:16       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:16         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:58         ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-24 17:58           ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 64/70] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK path in execbuffer ggtt pinning Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:05   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:05     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 65/70] drm/i915: Fix pin_map in scheduler selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:14   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:14     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 66/70] drm/i915: Add ww parameter to get_pages() callback Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:20   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:20     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 67/70] drm/i915: Add ww context to prepare_(read/write) Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 68/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 17:30   ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-23 17:30     ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-24  9:31     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24  9:31       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 10:11       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 10:11         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 11:54         ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 11:54           ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 69/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to i915_gem_object_pin_pages Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 70/70] drm/i915: Remove asynchronous vma binding Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:19   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:19     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev18) Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev19) Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-24 13:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-25 21:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev20) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210323155059.628690-27-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.