All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 17/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow yielding during MMU notifier unmap/zap, if possible
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 19:19:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210326021957.1424875-18-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326021957.1424875-1-seanjc@google.com>

Let the TDP MMU yield when unmapping a range in response to a MMU
notification, if yielding is allowed by said notification.  There is no
reason to disallow yielding in this case, and in theory the range being
invalidated could be quite large.

Cc: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index f6a82230baa5..21bb8b68a553 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range,
 
 	for_each_tdp_mmu_root(kvm, root, range->slot->as_id)
 		flush |= zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, range->start, range->end,
-				       false, flush);
+				       range->may_block, flush);
 
 	return flush;
 }
@@ -903,6 +903,10 @@ static __always_inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
+	/*
+	 * Don't support rescheduling, none of the MMU notifiers that funnel
+	 * into this helper allow blocking; it'd be dead, wasteful code.
+	 */
 	for_each_tdp_mmu_root(kvm, root, range->slot->as_id) {
 		tdp_root_for_each_leaf_pte(iter, root, range->start, range->end)
 			ret |= handler(kvm, &iter, range);
-- 
2.31.0.291.g576ba9dcdaf-goog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	 Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 17/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow yielding during MMU notifier unmap/zap, if possible
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 19:19:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210326021957.1424875-18-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326021957.1424875-1-seanjc@google.com>

Let the TDP MMU yield when unmapping a range in response to a MMU
notification, if yielding is allowed by said notification.  There is no
reason to disallow yielding in this case, and in theory the range being
invalidated could be quite large.

Cc: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index f6a82230baa5..21bb8b68a553 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range,
 
 	for_each_tdp_mmu_root(kvm, root, range->slot->as_id)
 		flush |= zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, range->start, range->end,
-				       false, flush);
+				       range->may_block, flush);
 
 	return flush;
 }
@@ -903,6 +903,10 @@ static __always_inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
+	/*
+	 * Don't support rescheduling, none of the MMU notifiers that funnel
+	 * into this helper allow blocking; it'd be dead, wasteful code.
+	 */
 	for_each_tdp_mmu_root(kvm, root, range->slot->as_id) {
 		tdp_root_for_each_leaf_pte(iter, root, range->start, range->end)
 			ret |= handler(kvm, &iter, range);
-- 
2.31.0.291.g576ba9dcdaf-goog

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	 Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	 Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	 Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	 Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,  linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 17/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow yielding during MMU notifier unmap/zap, if possible
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 19:19:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210326021957.1424875-18-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326021957.1424875-1-seanjc@google.com>

Let the TDP MMU yield when unmapping a range in response to a MMU
notification, if yielding is allowed by said notification.  There is no
reason to disallow yielding in this case, and in theory the range being
invalidated could be quite large.

Cc: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index f6a82230baa5..21bb8b68a553 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range,
 
 	for_each_tdp_mmu_root(kvm, root, range->slot->as_id)
 		flush |= zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, range->start, range->end,
-				       false, flush);
+				       range->may_block, flush);
 
 	return flush;
 }
@@ -903,6 +903,10 @@ static __always_inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
+	/*
+	 * Don't support rescheduling, none of the MMU notifiers that funnel
+	 * into this helper allow blocking; it'd be dead, wasteful code.
+	 */
 	for_each_tdp_mmu_root(kvm, root, range->slot->as_id) {
 		tdp_root_for_each_leaf_pte(iter, root, range->start, range->end)
 			ret |= handler(kvm, &iter, range);
-- 
2.31.0.291.g576ba9dcdaf-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 17/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow yielding during MMU notifier unmap/zap, if possible
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 02:19:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210326021957.1424875-18-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326021957.1424875-1-seanjc@google.com>

Let the TDP MMU yield when unmapping a range in response to a MMU
notification, if yielding is allowed by said notification.  There is no
reason to disallow yielding in this case, and in theory the range being
invalidated could be quite large.

Cc: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index f6a82230baa5..21bb8b68a553 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range,
 
 	for_each_tdp_mmu_root(kvm, root, range->slot->as_id)
 		flush |= zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, range->start, range->end,
-				       false, flush);
+				       range->may_block, flush);
 
 	return flush;
 }
@@ -903,6 +903,10 @@ static __always_inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
+	/*
+	 * Don't support rescheduling, none of the MMU notifiers that funnel
+	 * into this helper allow blocking; it'd be dead, wasteful code.
+	 */
 	for_each_tdp_mmu_root(kvm, root, range->slot->as_id) {
 		tdp_root_for_each_leaf_pte(iter, root, range->start, range->end)
 			ret |= handler(kvm, &iter, range);
-- 
2.31.0.291.g576ba9dcdaf-goog

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-26  2:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 168+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-26  2:19 [PATCH 00/18] KVM: Consolidate and optimize MMU notifiers Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 01/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Coalesce TDP MMU TLB flushes when zapping collapsible SPTEs Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 02/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Move flushing for "slot" handlers to caller for legacy MMU Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 03/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Coalesce TLB flushes when zapping collapsible SPTEs Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 04/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Coalesce TLB flushes across address spaces for gfn range zap Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 05/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass address space ID to __kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range() Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 06/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass address space ID to TDP MMU root walkers Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 07/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Use leaf-only loop for walking TDP SPTEs when changing SPTE Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 08/18] KVM: Move prototypes for MMU notifier callbacks to generic code Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 09/18] KVM: Move arm64's MMU notifier trace events " Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 10/18] KVM: Move x86's MMU notifier memslot walkers " Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31  7:52   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  7:52     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  7:52     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  7:52     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 16:20     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 16:20       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 16:20       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 16:36       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 16:36         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 16:36         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 16:36         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 11/18] KVM: arm64: Convert to the gfn-based MMU notifier callbacks Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 12/18] KVM: MIPS/MMU: " Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31  7:41   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  7:41     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  7:41     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  7:41     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 13/18] KVM: PPC: " Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 14/18] KVM: Kill off the old hva-based " Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 15/18] KVM: Take mmu_lock when handling MMU notifier iff the hva hits a memslot Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 16/18] KVM: Don't take mmu_lock for range invalidation unless necessary Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31  7:52   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  7:52     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  7:52     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  7:52     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  8:35   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  8:35     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  8:35     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  8:35     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 16:41     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 16:41       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 16:41       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 16:47       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 16:47         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 16:47         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 16:47         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 19:47         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 19:47           ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 19:47           ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 20:42           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 20:42             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 20:42             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 20:42             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 21:05             ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 21:05               ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 21:05               ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 21:22               ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 21:22                 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 21:22                 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 21:36                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 21:36                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 21:36                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 21:36                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 21:35               ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 21:35                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 21:35                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 21:35                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 21:47                 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 21:47                   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 21:47                   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 20:15     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 20:15       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 20:15       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 20:15       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 20:30       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 20:30         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 20:30         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 20:30         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 20:52     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 20:52       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 20:52       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 21:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 21:00         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 21:00         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 21:00         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-26  2:19 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-03-26  2:19   ` [PATCH 17/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow yielding during MMU notifier unmap/zap, if possible Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 18/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop trace_kvm_age_page() tracepoint Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-26  2:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-30 18:32 ` [PATCH 00/18] KVM: Consolidate and optimize MMU notifiers Ben Gardon
2021-03-30 18:32   ` Ben Gardon
2021-03-30 18:32   ` Ben Gardon
2021-03-30 18:32   ` Ben Gardon
2021-03-30 19:48   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-30 19:48     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-30 19:48     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-30 19:48     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-30 19:58   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-30 19:58     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-30 19:58     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31  7:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  7:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  7:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  7:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  9:34   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-31  9:34     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-31  9:34     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-31  9:34     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-31  9:41     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  9:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  9:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  9:41       ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210326021957.1424875-18-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.