All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
To: heiko@sntech.de
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
	u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, lee.jones@linaro.org,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: pwm: add more compatible strings to pwm-rockchip.yaml
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 22:01:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210412200155.5316-2-jbx6244@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210412200155.5316-1-jbx6244@gmail.com>

The compatible strings below are already in use in the Rockchip
dtsi files, but were somehow never added to a document, so add

"rockchip,rk3328-pwm"

"rockchip,rk3036-pwm", "rockchip,rk2928-pwm"

"rockchip,rk3368-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm"
"rockchip,rk3399-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm"

"rockchip,px30-pwm", "rockchip,rk3328-pwm"
"rockchip,rk3308-pwm", "rockchip,rk3328-pwm"

for pwm nodes to pwm-rockchip.yaml.

Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
---
Note for rob+dt:
A tag was not added on purpose, because by the change of schema
for clocks and clock-names I add "rockchip,rk3328-pwm" to
the "if:", so strictly speaking V1 and (V2) V3 will not be the same.
Please have a look at it again.

For some SoC nodes this patch serie generates notifications
for undocumented "interrupts" properties shared between
PWM channels till there is consensus of what to do with it or
someone makes a solution for the whole PWM block.

Changed V3:
  fix mistake with compatibles introduced in V2
Changed V2:
  changed schema for clocks and clock-names
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml
index 19b42d31d..5596bee70 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml
@@ -14,11 +14,22 @@ properties:
     oneOf:
       - const: rockchip,rk2928-pwm
       - const: rockchip,rk3288-pwm
+      - const: rockchip,rk3328-pwm
       - const: rockchip,vop-pwm
       - items:
+          - const: rockchip,rk3036-pwm
+          - const: rockchip,rk2928-pwm
+      - items:
           - enum:
+              - rockchip,rk3368-pwm
+              - rockchip,rk3399-pwm
               - rockchip,rv1108-pwm
           - const: rockchip,rk3288-pwm
+      - items:
+          - enum:
+              - rockchip,px30-pwm
+              - rockchip,rk3308-pwm
+          - const: rockchip,rk3328-pwm
 
   reg:
     maxItems: 1
@@ -46,6 +57,7 @@ if:
     compatible:
       contains:
         enum:
+          - rockchip,rk3328-pwm
           - rockchip,rv1108-pwm
 
 then:
-- 
2.11.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
To: heiko@sntech.de
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
	u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, lee.jones@linaro.org,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: pwm: add more compatible strings to pwm-rockchip.yaml
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 22:01:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210412200155.5316-2-jbx6244@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210412200155.5316-1-jbx6244@gmail.com>

The compatible strings below are already in use in the Rockchip
dtsi files, but were somehow never added to a document, so add

"rockchip,rk3328-pwm"

"rockchip,rk3036-pwm", "rockchip,rk2928-pwm"

"rockchip,rk3368-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm"
"rockchip,rk3399-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm"

"rockchip,px30-pwm", "rockchip,rk3328-pwm"
"rockchip,rk3308-pwm", "rockchip,rk3328-pwm"

for pwm nodes to pwm-rockchip.yaml.

Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
---
Note for rob+dt:
A tag was not added on purpose, because by the change of schema
for clocks and clock-names I add "rockchip,rk3328-pwm" to
the "if:", so strictly speaking V1 and (V2) V3 will not be the same.
Please have a look at it again.

For some SoC nodes this patch serie generates notifications
for undocumented "interrupts" properties shared between
PWM channels till there is consensus of what to do with it or
someone makes a solution for the whole PWM block.

Changed V3:
  fix mistake with compatibles introduced in V2
Changed V2:
  changed schema for clocks and clock-names
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml
index 19b42d31d..5596bee70 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml
@@ -14,11 +14,22 @@ properties:
     oneOf:
       - const: rockchip,rk2928-pwm
       - const: rockchip,rk3288-pwm
+      - const: rockchip,rk3328-pwm
       - const: rockchip,vop-pwm
       - items:
+          - const: rockchip,rk3036-pwm
+          - const: rockchip,rk2928-pwm
+      - items:
           - enum:
+              - rockchip,rk3368-pwm
+              - rockchip,rk3399-pwm
               - rockchip,rv1108-pwm
           - const: rockchip,rk3288-pwm
+      - items:
+          - enum:
+              - rockchip,px30-pwm
+              - rockchip,rk3308-pwm
+          - const: rockchip,rk3328-pwm
 
   reg:
     maxItems: 1
@@ -46,6 +57,7 @@ if:
     compatible:
       contains:
         enum:
+          - rockchip,rk3328-pwm
           - rockchip,rv1108-pwm
 
 then:
-- 
2.11.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
To: heiko@sntech.de
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
	u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, lee.jones@linaro.org,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: pwm: add more compatible strings to pwm-rockchip.yaml
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 22:01:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210412200155.5316-2-jbx6244@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210412200155.5316-1-jbx6244@gmail.com>

The compatible strings below are already in use in the Rockchip
dtsi files, but were somehow never added to a document, so add

"rockchip,rk3328-pwm"

"rockchip,rk3036-pwm", "rockchip,rk2928-pwm"

"rockchip,rk3368-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm"
"rockchip,rk3399-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm"

"rockchip,px30-pwm", "rockchip,rk3328-pwm"
"rockchip,rk3308-pwm", "rockchip,rk3328-pwm"

for pwm nodes to pwm-rockchip.yaml.

Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
---
Note for rob+dt:
A tag was not added on purpose, because by the change of schema
for clocks and clock-names I add "rockchip,rk3328-pwm" to
the "if:", so strictly speaking V1 and (V2) V3 will not be the same.
Please have a look at it again.

For some SoC nodes this patch serie generates notifications
for undocumented "interrupts" properties shared between
PWM channels till there is consensus of what to do with it or
someone makes a solution for the whole PWM block.

Changed V3:
  fix mistake with compatibles introduced in V2
Changed V2:
  changed schema for clocks and clock-names
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml
index 19b42d31d..5596bee70 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml
@@ -14,11 +14,22 @@ properties:
     oneOf:
       - const: rockchip,rk2928-pwm
       - const: rockchip,rk3288-pwm
+      - const: rockchip,rk3328-pwm
       - const: rockchip,vop-pwm
       - items:
+          - const: rockchip,rk3036-pwm
+          - const: rockchip,rk2928-pwm
+      - items:
           - enum:
+              - rockchip,rk3368-pwm
+              - rockchip,rk3399-pwm
               - rockchip,rv1108-pwm
           - const: rockchip,rk3288-pwm
+      - items:
+          - enum:
+              - rockchip,px30-pwm
+              - rockchip,rk3308-pwm
+          - const: rockchip,rk3328-pwm
 
   reg:
     maxItems: 1
@@ -46,6 +57,7 @@ if:
     compatible:
       contains:
         enum:
+          - rockchip,rk3328-pwm
           - rockchip,rv1108-pwm
 
 then:
-- 
2.11.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-12 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-12 20:01 [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: pwm: convert pwm-rockchip.txt to YAML Johan Jonker
2021-04-12 20:01 ` Johan Jonker
2021-04-12 20:01 ` Johan Jonker
2021-04-12 20:01 ` Johan Jonker [this message]
2021-04-12 20:01   ` [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: pwm: add more compatible strings to pwm-rockchip.yaml Johan Jonker
2021-04-12 20:01   ` Johan Jonker
2021-04-13 13:37   ` Rob Herring
2021-04-13 13:37     ` Rob Herring
2021-04-13 13:37     ` Rob Herring
2021-04-13 15:22   ` Thierry Reding
2021-04-13 15:22     ` Thierry Reding
2021-04-13 15:22     ` Thierry Reding
2021-04-12 20:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ARM: dts: rockchip: remove clock-names from pwm nodes Johan Jonker
2021-04-12 20:01   ` Johan Jonker
2021-04-12 20:01   ` Johan Jonker
2021-04-12 20:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: " Johan Jonker
2021-04-12 20:01   ` Johan Jonker
2021-04-12 20:01   ` Johan Jonker
2021-04-13 13:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: pwm: convert pwm-rockchip.txt to YAML Rob Herring
2021-04-13 13:37   ` Rob Herring
2021-04-13 13:37   ` Rob Herring
2021-04-13 15:21 ` Thierry Reding
2021-04-13 15:21   ` Thierry Reding
2021-04-13 15:21   ` Thierry Reding
2021-04-13 15:24   ` Heiko Stübner
2021-04-13 15:24     ` Heiko Stübner
2021-04-13 15:24     ` Heiko Stübner
2021-04-23 16:53 ` Thierry Reding
2021-04-23 16:53   ` Thierry Reding
2021-04-23 16:53   ` Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210412200155.5316-2-jbx6244@gmail.com \
    --to=jbx6244@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.