From: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: christian.koenig@amd.com Subject: [PATCH 9/9] drm/amdgpu: Lock the attached dmabuf in unpopulate Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 02:48:04 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210414064804.29356-10-Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210414064804.29356-1-Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> amdgpu_ttm_tt_unpopulate can be called during bo_destroy. The dmabuf->resv must not be held by the caller or dma_buf_detach will deadlock. This is probably not the right fix. I get a recursive lock warning with the reservation held in ttm_bo_release. Should unmap_attachment move to backend_unbind instead? Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c index 936b3cfdde55..257750921eed 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c @@ -1216,9 +1216,22 @@ static void amdgpu_ttm_tt_unpopulate(struct ttm_device *bdev, if (ttm->sg && gtt->gobj->import_attach) { struct dma_buf_attachment *attach; + bool locked; attach = gtt->gobj->import_attach; + /* FIXME: unpopulate can be called during bo_destroy. + * The dmabuf->resv must not be held by the caller or + * dma_buf_detach will deadlock. This is probably not + * the right fix. I get a recursive lock warning with the + * reservation held in ttm_bo_releas.. Should + * unmap_attachment move to backend_unbind instead? + */ + locked = dma_resv_is_locked(attach->dmabuf->resv); + if (!locked) + dma_resv_lock(attach->dmabuf->resv, NULL); dma_buf_unmap_attachment(attach, ttm->sg, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); + if (!locked) + dma_resv_unlock(attach->dmabuf->resv); ttm->sg = NULL; return; } -- 2.31.1 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: christian.koenig@amd.com Subject: [PATCH 9/9] drm/amdgpu: Lock the attached dmabuf in unpopulate Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 02:48:04 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210414064804.29356-10-Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210414064804.29356-1-Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> amdgpu_ttm_tt_unpopulate can be called during bo_destroy. The dmabuf->resv must not be held by the caller or dma_buf_detach will deadlock. This is probably not the right fix. I get a recursive lock warning with the reservation held in ttm_bo_release. Should unmap_attachment move to backend_unbind instead? Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c index 936b3cfdde55..257750921eed 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c @@ -1216,9 +1216,22 @@ static void amdgpu_ttm_tt_unpopulate(struct ttm_device *bdev, if (ttm->sg && gtt->gobj->import_attach) { struct dma_buf_attachment *attach; + bool locked; attach = gtt->gobj->import_attach; + /* FIXME: unpopulate can be called during bo_destroy. + * The dmabuf->resv must not be held by the caller or + * dma_buf_detach will deadlock. This is probably not + * the right fix. I get a recursive lock warning with the + * reservation held in ttm_bo_releas.. Should + * unmap_attachment move to backend_unbind instead? + */ + locked = dma_resv_is_locked(attach->dmabuf->resv); + if (!locked) + dma_resv_lock(attach->dmabuf->resv, NULL); dma_buf_unmap_attachment(attach, ttm->sg, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); + if (!locked) + dma_resv_unlock(attach->dmabuf->resv); ttm->sg = NULL; return; } -- 2.31.1 _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 6:48 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-04-14 6:47 [PATCH 0/9] Implement multi-GPU DMA mappings for KFD Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:47 ` Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:47 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/amdgpu: Rename kfd_bo_va_list to kfd_mem_attachment Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:47 ` Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:47 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/amdgpu: Keep a bo-reference per-attachment Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:47 ` Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:47 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/amdgpu: Simplify AQL queue mapping Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:47 ` Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:47 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/amdgpu: Add multi-GPU DMA mapping helpers Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:47 ` Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:48 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/amdgpu: DMA map/unmap when updating GPU mappings Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:48 ` Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:48 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/amdgpu: Move kfd_mem_attach outside reservation Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:48 ` Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:48 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/amdgpu: Add DMA mapping of GTT BOs Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:48 ` Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:48 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/ttm: Don't count pages in SG BOs against pages_limit Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:48 ` Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:51 ` Christian König 2021-04-14 6:51 ` Christian König 2021-04-14 9:15 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-04-14 9:15 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-04-14 9:19 ` Christian König 2021-04-14 9:19 ` Christian König 2021-04-14 10:26 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-04-14 10:26 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-04-14 10:49 ` Christian König 2021-04-14 10:49 ` Christian König 2021-04-14 12:25 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-04-14 12:25 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-04-14 12:43 ` Christian König 2021-04-14 12:43 ` Christian König 2021-04-14 12:47 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-04-14 12:47 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-04-14 12:49 ` Christian König 2021-04-14 12:49 ` Christian König 2021-04-14 14:41 ` Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 14:41 ` Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:48 ` Felix Kuehling [this message] 2021-04-14 6:48 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/amdgpu: Lock the attached dmabuf in unpopulate Felix Kuehling -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2021-04-14 6:46 [PATCH 0/9] Implement multi-GPU DMA mappings for KFD Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 6:46 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/amdgpu: Lock the attached dmabuf in unpopulate Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 7:33 ` Christian König 2021-04-14 15:15 ` Felix Kuehling 2021-04-14 15:15 ` Felix Kuehling 2021-04-15 7:41 ` Christian König 2021-04-15 7:41 ` Christian König 2021-04-15 14:29 ` Felix Kuehling 2021-04-15 14:29 ` Felix Kuehling
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210414064804.29356-10-Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \ --to=felix.kuehling@amd.com \ --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.