From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
nathan@kernel.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] perf: Get rid of oprofile leftovers
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:44:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210414134409.1266357-6-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414134409.1266357-1-maz@kernel.org>
perf_pmu_name() and perf_num_counters() are unused. Drop them.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 --
kernel/events/core.c | 5 -----
2 files changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 3f7f89ea5e51..51154ed9a206 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -951,8 +951,6 @@ extern void perf_event_itrace_started(struct perf_event *event);
extern int perf_pmu_register(struct pmu *pmu, const char *name, int type);
extern void perf_pmu_unregister(struct pmu *pmu);
-extern int perf_num_counters(void);
-extern const char *perf_pmu_name(void);
extern void __perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *task);
extern void __perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 03db40f6cba9..88cb0ba5690b 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -580,11 +580,6 @@ static u64 perf_event_time(struct perf_event *event);
void __weak perf_event_print_debug(void) { }
-extern __weak const char *perf_pmu_name(void)
-{
- return "pmu";
-}
-
static inline u64 perf_clock(void)
{
return local_clock();
--
2.29.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
nathan@kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] perf: Get rid of oprofile leftovers
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:44:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210414134409.1266357-6-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414134409.1266357-1-maz@kernel.org>
perf_pmu_name() and perf_num_counters() are unused. Drop them.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 --
kernel/events/core.c | 5 -----
2 files changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 3f7f89ea5e51..51154ed9a206 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -951,8 +951,6 @@ extern void perf_event_itrace_started(struct perf_event *event);
extern int perf_pmu_register(struct pmu *pmu, const char *name, int type);
extern void perf_pmu_unregister(struct pmu *pmu);
-extern int perf_num_counters(void);
-extern const char *perf_pmu_name(void);
extern void __perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *task);
extern void __perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 03db40f6cba9..88cb0ba5690b 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -580,11 +580,6 @@ static u64 perf_event_time(struct perf_event *event);
void __weak perf_event_print_debug(void) { }
-extern __weak const char *perf_pmu_name(void)
-{
- return "pmu";
-}
-
static inline u64 perf_clock(void)
{
return local_clock();
--
2.29.2
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
nathan@kernel.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] perf: Get rid of oprofile leftovers
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:44:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210414134409.1266357-6-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414134409.1266357-1-maz@kernel.org>
perf_pmu_name() and perf_num_counters() are unused. Drop them.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 --
kernel/events/core.c | 5 -----
2 files changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 3f7f89ea5e51..51154ed9a206 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -951,8 +951,6 @@ extern void perf_event_itrace_started(struct perf_event *event);
extern int perf_pmu_register(struct pmu *pmu, const char *name, int type);
extern void perf_pmu_unregister(struct pmu *pmu);
-extern int perf_num_counters(void);
-extern const char *perf_pmu_name(void);
extern void __perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *task);
extern void __perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 03db40f6cba9..88cb0ba5690b 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -580,11 +580,6 @@ static u64 perf_event_time(struct perf_event *event);
void __weak perf_event_print_debug(void) { }
-extern __weak const char *perf_pmu_name(void)
-{
- return "pmu";
-}
-
static inline u64 perf_clock(void)
{
return local_clock();
--
2.29.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-14 13:44 [PATCH 0/5] perf: oprofile spring cleanup Marc Zyngier
2021-04-14 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-14 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-14 13:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: Divorce the perf code from oprofile helpers Marc Zyngier
2021-04-14 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-14 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-15 6:59 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-04-15 6:59 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-04-15 6:59 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-04-15 10:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-15 10:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-15 11:34 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-04-15 11:34 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-04-15 11:34 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-04-15 13:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-15 13:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-22 10:43 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 10:43 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 10:43 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-14 13:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: Get rid of oprofile leftovers Marc Zyngier
2021-04-14 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-14 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-22 10:45 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 10:45 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 10:45 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-14 13:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] s390: " Marc Zyngier
2021-04-14 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-14 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-15 10:38 ` Heiko Carstens
2021-04-15 10:38 ` Heiko Carstens
2021-04-15 10:38 ` Heiko Carstens
2021-04-15 10:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-15 10:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-15 10:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-15 12:12 ` Heiko Carstens
2021-04-15 12:12 ` Heiko Carstens
2021-04-15 12:12 ` Heiko Carstens
2021-04-14 13:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] sh: " Marc Zyngier
2021-04-14 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-14 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-14 19:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-04-14 19:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-04-14 19:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-04-14 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-04-14 13:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf: " Marc Zyngier
2021-04-14 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-22 10:47 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 10:47 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 10:47 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 12:48 ` [PATCH 0/5] perf: oprofile spring cleanup Marc Zyngier
2021-04-22 12:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-22 12:48 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210414134409.1266357-6-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.