All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] spi: Fix spi device unregister flow
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:56:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210426235638.1285530-1-saravanak@google.com> (raw)

When an SPI device is unregistered, the spi->controller->cleanup() is
called in the device's release callback. That's wrong for a couple of
reasons:

1. spi_dev_put() can be called before spi_add_device() is called. And
   it's spi_add_device() that calls spi_setup(). This will cause clean()
   to get called without the spi device ever being setup.

2. There's no guarantee that the controller's driver would be present by
   the time the spi device's release function gets called.

3. It also causes "sleeping in atomic context" stack dump[1] when device
   link deletion code does a put_device() on the spi device.

Fix these issues by simply moving the cleanup from the device release
callback to the actual spi_unregister_device() function.

[1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHp75Vc=FCGcUyS0v6fnxme2YJ+qD+Y-hQDQLa2JhWNON9VmsQ@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index b08efe88ccd6..7d0d89172a1d 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -47,10 +47,6 @@ static void spidev_release(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct spi_device	*spi = to_spi_device(dev);
 
-	/* spi controllers may cleanup for released devices */
-	if (spi->controller->cleanup)
-		spi->controller->cleanup(spi);
-
 	spi_controller_put(spi->controller);
 	kfree(spi->driver_override);
 	kfree(spi);
@@ -558,6 +554,12 @@ static int spi_dev_check(struct device *dev, void *data)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void spi_cleanup(struct spi_device *spi)
+{
+	if (spi->controller->cleanup)
+		spi->controller->cleanup(spi);
+}
+
 /**
  * spi_add_device - Add spi_device allocated with spi_alloc_device
  * @spi: spi_device to register
@@ -622,11 +624,13 @@ int spi_add_device(struct spi_device *spi)
 
 	/* Device may be bound to an active driver when this returns */
 	status = device_add(&spi->dev);
-	if (status < 0)
+	if (status < 0) {
 		dev_err(dev, "can't add %s, status %d\n",
 				dev_name(&spi->dev), status);
-	else
+		spi_cleanup(spi);
+	} else {
 		dev_dbg(dev, "registered child %s\n", dev_name(&spi->dev));
+	}
 
 done:
 	mutex_unlock(&spi_add_lock);
@@ -713,6 +717,8 @@ void spi_unregister_device(struct spi_device *spi)
 	if (!spi)
 		return;
 
+	spi_cleanup(spi);
+
 	if (spi->dev.of_node) {
 		of_node_clear_flag(spi->dev.of_node, OF_POPULATED);
 		of_node_put(spi->dev.of_node);
-- 
2.31.1.498.g6c1eba8ee3d-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2021-04-26 23:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-26 23:56 Saravana Kannan [this message]
2021-04-27  6:52 ` [PATCH] spi: Fix spi device unregister flow Andy Shevchenko
2021-04-27 10:48   ` Mark Brown
2021-04-27 11:42     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-04-27 11:49       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-04-27 15:02         ` Saravana Kannan
2021-04-28 16:53 ` Mark Brown
2021-05-03 10:07 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-05-03 10:16   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-03 17:21   ` Saravana Kannan
2021-05-03 17:56     ` Lukas Wunner
2021-05-03 18:15       ` Saravana Kannan
2021-05-04  9:17         ` Lukas Wunner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210426235638.1285530-1-saravanak@google.com \
    --to=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.