All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: matthew.brost@intel.com, tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com,
	daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com, jason.ekstrand@intel.com,
	jon.bloomfield@intel.com, daniel.vetter@intel.com,
	john.c.harrison@intel.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 44/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC submission tasklet
Date: Thu,  6 May 2021 12:13:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210506191451.77768-45-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210506191451.77768-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>

Implement GuC submission tasklet for new interface. The new GuC
interface uses H2G to submit contexts to the GuC. Since H2G use a single
channel, a single tasklet submits is used for the submission path. As
such a global struct intel_engine_cs has been added to leverage the
existing scheduling code.

Also the per engine interrupt handler has been updated to disable the
rescheduling of the physical engine tasklet, when using GuC scheduling,
as the physical engine tasklet is no longer used.

In this patch the field, guc_id, has been added to intel_context and is
not assigned. Patches later in the series will assign this value.

Cc: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h |   9 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h        |   4 +
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 233 +++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
index ed8c447a7346..bb6fef7eae52 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
@@ -136,6 +136,15 @@ struct intel_context {
 	struct intel_sseu sseu;
 
 	u8 wa_bb_page; /* if set, page num reserved for context workarounds */
+
+	/* GuC scheduling state that does not require a lock. */
+	atomic_t guc_sched_state_no_lock;
+
+	/*
+	 * GuC lrc descriptor ID - Not assigned in this patch but future patches
+	 * in the series will.
+	 */
+	u16 guc_id;
 };
 
 #endif /* __INTEL_CONTEXT_TYPES__ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
index 2eb6c497e43c..d32866fe90ad 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
@@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ struct intel_guc {
 	struct intel_guc_log log;
 	struct intel_guc_ct ct;
 
+	/* Global engine used to submit requests to GuC */
+	struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine;
+	struct i915_request *stalled_request;
+
 	/* intel_guc_recv interrupt related state */
 	spinlock_t irq_lock;
 	unsigned int msg_enabled_mask;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index c2b6d27404b7..0955a8b00ee8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -60,6 +60,30 @@
 
 #define GUC_REQUEST_SIZE 64 /* bytes */
 
+/*
+ * Below is a set of functions which control the GuC scheduling state which do
+ * not require a lock as all state transitions are mutually exclusive. i.e. It
+ * is not possible for the context pinning code and submission, for the same
+ * context, to be executing simultaneously.
+ */
+#define SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED			BIT(0)
+static inline bool context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+	return (atomic_read(&ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock) &
+		SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED);
+}
+
+static inline void set_context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+	atomic_or(SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED, &ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void clr_context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+	atomic_and((u32)~SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED,
+		   &ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock);
+}
+
 static inline struct i915_priolist *to_priolist(struct rb_node *rb)
 {
 	return rb_entry(rb, struct i915_priolist, node);
@@ -122,37 +146,29 @@ static inline void set_lrc_desc_registered(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 id,
 	xa_store_irq(&guc->context_lookup, id, ce, GFP_ATOMIC);
 }
 
-static void guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
+static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
 {
-	/* Leaving stub as this function will be used in future patches */
-}
+	int err;
+	struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
+	u32 action[3];
+	int len = 0;
+	bool enabled = context_enabled(ce);
 
-/*
- * When we're doing submissions using regular execlists backend, writing to
- * ELSP from CPU side is enough to make sure that writes to ringbuffer pages
- * pinned in mappable aperture portion of GGTT are visible to command streamer.
- * Writes done by GuC on our behalf are not guaranteeing such ordering,
- * therefore, to ensure the flush, we're issuing a POSTING READ.
- */
-static void flush_ggtt_writes(struct i915_vma *vma)
-{
-	if (i915_vma_is_map_and_fenceable(vma))
-		intel_uncore_posting_read_fw(vma->vm->gt->uncore,
-					     GUC_STATUS);
-}
+	if (!enabled) {
+		action[len++] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_SET;
+		action[len++] = ce->guc_id;
+		action[len++] = GUC_CONTEXT_ENABLE;
+	} else {
+		action[len++] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SCHED_CONTEXT;
+		action[len++] = ce->guc_id;
+	}
 
-static void guc_submit(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
-		       struct i915_request **out,
-		       struct i915_request **end)
-{
-	struct intel_guc *guc = &engine->gt->uc.guc;
+	err = intel_guc_send_nb(guc, action, len);
 
-	do {
-		struct i915_request *rq = *out++;
+	if (!enabled && !err)
+		set_context_enabled(ce);
 
-		flush_ggtt_writes(rq->ring->vma);
-		guc_add_request(guc, rq);
-	} while (out != end);
+	return err;
 }
 
 static inline int rq_prio(const struct i915_request *rq)
@@ -160,125 +176,88 @@ static inline int rq_prio(const struct i915_request *rq)
 	return rq->sched.attr.priority;
 }
 
-static struct i915_request *schedule_in(struct i915_request *rq, int idx)
-{
-	trace_i915_request_in(rq, idx);
-
-	/*
-	 * Currently we are not tracking the rq->context being inflight
-	 * (ce->inflight = rq->engine). It is only used by the execlists
-	 * backend at the moment, a similar counting strategy would be
-	 * required if we generalise the inflight tracking.
-	 */
-
-	__intel_gt_pm_get(rq->engine->gt);
-	return i915_request_get(rq);
-}
-
-static void schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq)
-{
-	trace_i915_request_out(rq);
-
-	intel_gt_pm_put_async(rq->engine->gt);
-	i915_request_put(rq);
-}
-
-static void __guc_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+static int guc_dequeue_one_context(struct intel_guc *guc)
 {
-	struct i915_sched_engine * const sched_engine = engine->sched_engine;
-	struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
-	struct i915_request **first = execlists->inflight;
-	struct i915_request ** const last_port = first + execlists->port_mask;
-	struct i915_request *last = first[0];
-	struct i915_request **port;
+	struct i915_sched_engine * const sched_engine = guc->sched_engine;
+	struct i915_request *last = NULL;
 	bool submit = false;
 	struct rb_node *rb;
+	int ret;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&engine->sched_engine->lock);
-
-	if (last) {
-		if (*++first)
-			return;
+	lockdep_assert_held(&sched_engine->lock);
 
-		last = NULL;
+	if (guc->stalled_request) {
+		submit = true;
+		last = guc->stalled_request;
+		goto resubmit;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * We write directly into the execlists->inflight queue and don't use
-	 * the execlists->pending queue, as we don't have a distinct switch
-	 * event.
-	 */
-	port = first;
 	while ((rb = rb_first_cached(&sched_engine->queue))) {
 		struct i915_priolist *p = to_priolist(rb);
 		struct i915_request *rq, *rn;
 
 		priolist_for_each_request_consume(rq, rn, p) {
-			if (last && rq->context != last->context) {
-				if (port == last_port)
-					goto done;
-
-				*port = schedule_in(last,
-						    port - execlists->inflight);
-				port++;
-			}
+			if (last && rq->context != last->context)
+				goto done;
 
 			list_del_init(&rq->sched.link);
+
 			__i915_request_submit(rq);
-			submit = true;
+
+			trace_i915_request_in(rq, 0);
 			last = rq;
+			submit = true;
 		}
 
 		rb_erase_cached(&p->node, &sched_engine->queue);
 		i915_priolist_free(p);
 	}
 done:
-	sched_engine->queue_priority_hint =
-		rb ? to_priolist(rb)->priority : INT_MIN;
 	if (submit) {
-		*port = schedule_in(last, port - execlists->inflight);
-		*++port = NULL;
-		guc_submit(engine, first, port);
+		last->context->lrc_reg_state[CTX_RING_TAIL] =
+			intel_ring_set_tail(last->ring, last->tail);
+resubmit:
+		/*
+		 * We only check for -EBUSY here even though it is possible for
+		 * -EDEADLK to be returned. If -EDEADLK is returned, the GuC has
+		 * died and a full GPU needs to be done. The hangcheck will
+		 * eventually detect that the GuC has died and trigger this
+		 * reset so no need to handle -EDEADLK here.
+		 */
+		ret = guc_add_request(guc, last);
+		if (ret == -EBUSY) {
+			i915_sched_engine_kick(sched_engine);
+			guc->stalled_request = last;
+			return false;
+		}
 	}
-	execlists->active = execlists->inflight;
+
+	guc->stalled_request = NULL;
+	return submit;
 }
 
 static void guc_submission_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 {
 	struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine =
 		from_tasklet(sched_engine, t, tasklet);
-	struct intel_engine_cs * const engine = sched_engine->engine;
-	struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
-	struct i915_request **port, *rq;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	bool loop;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
-
-	for (port = execlists->inflight; (rq = *port); port++) {
-		if (!i915_request_completed(rq))
-			break;
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
 
-		schedule_out(rq);
-	}
-	if (port != execlists->inflight) {
-		int idx = port - execlists->inflight;
-		int rem = ARRAY_SIZE(execlists->inflight) - idx;
-		memmove(execlists->inflight, port, rem * sizeof(*port));
-	}
-
-	__guc_dequeue(engine);
+	do {
+		loop = guc_dequeue_one_context(&sched_engine->engine->gt->uc.guc);
+	} while (loop);
 
-	i915_sched_engine_reset_on_empty(engine->sched_engine);
+	i915_sched_engine_reset_on_empty(sched_engine);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void cs_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u16 iir)
 {
-	if (iir & GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT) {
+	if (iir & GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT)
 		intel_engine_signal_breadcrumbs(engine);
-		i915_sched_engine_hi_kick(engine->sched_engine);
-	}
 }
 
 static void guc_reset_prepare(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -351,6 +330,10 @@ static void guc_reset_cancel(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	struct rb_node *rb;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	/* Can be called during boot if GuC fails to load */
+	if (!engine->gt)
+		return;
+
 	ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "\n");
 
 	/*
@@ -437,8 +420,11 @@ int intel_guc_submission_init(struct intel_guc *guc)
 
 void intel_guc_submission_fini(struct intel_guc *guc)
 {
-	if (guc->lrc_desc_pool)
-		guc_lrc_desc_pool_destroy(guc);
+	if (!guc->lrc_desc_pool)
+		return;
+
+	guc_lrc_desc_pool_destroy(guc);
+	i915_sched_engine_put(guc->sched_engine);
 }
 
 static int guc_context_alloc(struct intel_context *ce)
@@ -503,32 +489,32 @@ static int guc_request_alloc(struct i915_request *request)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline void queue_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+static inline void queue_request(struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine,
 				 struct i915_request *rq,
 				 int prio)
 {
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->sched.link));
 	list_add_tail(&rq->sched.link,
-		      i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine->sched_engine, prio));
+		      i915_sched_lookup_priolist(sched_engine, prio));
 	set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
 }
 
 static void guc_submit_request(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
-	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = rq->engine;
+	struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine = rq->engine->sched_engine;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/* Will be called from irq-context when using foreign fences. */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
 
-	queue_request(engine, rq, rq_prio(rq));
+	queue_request(sched_engine, rq, rq_prio(rq));
 
-	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_sched_engine_is_empty(engine->sched_engine));
+	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_sched_engine_is_empty(sched_engine));
 	GEM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&rq->sched.link));
 
-	i915_sched_engine_hi_kick(engine->sched_engine);
+	i915_sched_engine_hi_kick(sched_engine);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void sanitize_hwsp(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -606,8 +592,6 @@ static void guc_release(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
 	engine->sanitize = NULL; /* no longer in control, nothing to sanitize */
 
-	tasklet_kill(&engine->sched_engine->tasklet);
-
 	intel_engine_cleanup_common(engine);
 	lrc_fini_wa_ctx(engine);
 }
@@ -678,6 +662,7 @@ static inline void guc_default_irqs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 int intel_guc_submission_setup(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = engine->i915;
+	struct intel_guc *guc = &engine->gt->uc.guc;
 
 	/*
 	 * The setup relies on several assumptions (e.g. irqs always enabled)
@@ -685,8 +670,18 @@ int intel_guc_submission_setup(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	 */
 	GEM_BUG_ON(INTEL_GEN(i915) < 11);
 
-	tasklet_setup(&engine->sched_engine->tasklet, guc_submission_tasklet);
-	engine->sched_engine->schedule = i915_schedule;
+	if (!guc->sched_engine) {
+		guc->sched_engine = i915_sched_engine_create(ENGINE_VIRTUAL);
+		if (!guc->sched_engine)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		guc->sched_engine->schedule = i915_schedule;
+		guc->sched_engine->engine = engine;
+		tasklet_setup(&guc->sched_engine->tasklet,
+			      guc_submission_tasklet);
+	}
+	i915_sched_engine_put(engine->sched_engine);
+	engine->sched_engine = i915_sched_engine_get(guc->sched_engine);
 
 	guc_default_vfuncs(engine);
 	guc_default_irqs(engine);
-- 
2.28.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: jason.ekstrand@intel.com, daniel.vetter@intel.com
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 44/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC submission tasklet
Date: Thu,  6 May 2021 12:13:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210506191451.77768-45-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210506191451.77768-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>

Implement GuC submission tasklet for new interface. The new GuC
interface uses H2G to submit contexts to the GuC. Since H2G use a single
channel, a single tasklet submits is used for the submission path. As
such a global struct intel_engine_cs has been added to leverage the
existing scheduling code.

Also the per engine interrupt handler has been updated to disable the
rescheduling of the physical engine tasklet, when using GuC scheduling,
as the physical engine tasklet is no longer used.

In this patch the field, guc_id, has been added to intel_context and is
not assigned. Patches later in the series will assign this value.

Cc: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h |   9 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h        |   4 +
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 233 +++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
index ed8c447a7346..bb6fef7eae52 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
@@ -136,6 +136,15 @@ struct intel_context {
 	struct intel_sseu sseu;
 
 	u8 wa_bb_page; /* if set, page num reserved for context workarounds */
+
+	/* GuC scheduling state that does not require a lock. */
+	atomic_t guc_sched_state_no_lock;
+
+	/*
+	 * GuC lrc descriptor ID - Not assigned in this patch but future patches
+	 * in the series will.
+	 */
+	u16 guc_id;
 };
 
 #endif /* __INTEL_CONTEXT_TYPES__ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
index 2eb6c497e43c..d32866fe90ad 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
@@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ struct intel_guc {
 	struct intel_guc_log log;
 	struct intel_guc_ct ct;
 
+	/* Global engine used to submit requests to GuC */
+	struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine;
+	struct i915_request *stalled_request;
+
 	/* intel_guc_recv interrupt related state */
 	spinlock_t irq_lock;
 	unsigned int msg_enabled_mask;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index c2b6d27404b7..0955a8b00ee8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -60,6 +60,30 @@
 
 #define GUC_REQUEST_SIZE 64 /* bytes */
 
+/*
+ * Below is a set of functions which control the GuC scheduling state which do
+ * not require a lock as all state transitions are mutually exclusive. i.e. It
+ * is not possible for the context pinning code and submission, for the same
+ * context, to be executing simultaneously.
+ */
+#define SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED			BIT(0)
+static inline bool context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+	return (atomic_read(&ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock) &
+		SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED);
+}
+
+static inline void set_context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+	atomic_or(SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED, &ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void clr_context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+	atomic_and((u32)~SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED,
+		   &ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock);
+}
+
 static inline struct i915_priolist *to_priolist(struct rb_node *rb)
 {
 	return rb_entry(rb, struct i915_priolist, node);
@@ -122,37 +146,29 @@ static inline void set_lrc_desc_registered(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 id,
 	xa_store_irq(&guc->context_lookup, id, ce, GFP_ATOMIC);
 }
 
-static void guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
+static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
 {
-	/* Leaving stub as this function will be used in future patches */
-}
+	int err;
+	struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
+	u32 action[3];
+	int len = 0;
+	bool enabled = context_enabled(ce);
 
-/*
- * When we're doing submissions using regular execlists backend, writing to
- * ELSP from CPU side is enough to make sure that writes to ringbuffer pages
- * pinned in mappable aperture portion of GGTT are visible to command streamer.
- * Writes done by GuC on our behalf are not guaranteeing such ordering,
- * therefore, to ensure the flush, we're issuing a POSTING READ.
- */
-static void flush_ggtt_writes(struct i915_vma *vma)
-{
-	if (i915_vma_is_map_and_fenceable(vma))
-		intel_uncore_posting_read_fw(vma->vm->gt->uncore,
-					     GUC_STATUS);
-}
+	if (!enabled) {
+		action[len++] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_SET;
+		action[len++] = ce->guc_id;
+		action[len++] = GUC_CONTEXT_ENABLE;
+	} else {
+		action[len++] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SCHED_CONTEXT;
+		action[len++] = ce->guc_id;
+	}
 
-static void guc_submit(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
-		       struct i915_request **out,
-		       struct i915_request **end)
-{
-	struct intel_guc *guc = &engine->gt->uc.guc;
+	err = intel_guc_send_nb(guc, action, len);
 
-	do {
-		struct i915_request *rq = *out++;
+	if (!enabled && !err)
+		set_context_enabled(ce);
 
-		flush_ggtt_writes(rq->ring->vma);
-		guc_add_request(guc, rq);
-	} while (out != end);
+	return err;
 }
 
 static inline int rq_prio(const struct i915_request *rq)
@@ -160,125 +176,88 @@ static inline int rq_prio(const struct i915_request *rq)
 	return rq->sched.attr.priority;
 }
 
-static struct i915_request *schedule_in(struct i915_request *rq, int idx)
-{
-	trace_i915_request_in(rq, idx);
-
-	/*
-	 * Currently we are not tracking the rq->context being inflight
-	 * (ce->inflight = rq->engine). It is only used by the execlists
-	 * backend at the moment, a similar counting strategy would be
-	 * required if we generalise the inflight tracking.
-	 */
-
-	__intel_gt_pm_get(rq->engine->gt);
-	return i915_request_get(rq);
-}
-
-static void schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq)
-{
-	trace_i915_request_out(rq);
-
-	intel_gt_pm_put_async(rq->engine->gt);
-	i915_request_put(rq);
-}
-
-static void __guc_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+static int guc_dequeue_one_context(struct intel_guc *guc)
 {
-	struct i915_sched_engine * const sched_engine = engine->sched_engine;
-	struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
-	struct i915_request **first = execlists->inflight;
-	struct i915_request ** const last_port = first + execlists->port_mask;
-	struct i915_request *last = first[0];
-	struct i915_request **port;
+	struct i915_sched_engine * const sched_engine = guc->sched_engine;
+	struct i915_request *last = NULL;
 	bool submit = false;
 	struct rb_node *rb;
+	int ret;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&engine->sched_engine->lock);
-
-	if (last) {
-		if (*++first)
-			return;
+	lockdep_assert_held(&sched_engine->lock);
 
-		last = NULL;
+	if (guc->stalled_request) {
+		submit = true;
+		last = guc->stalled_request;
+		goto resubmit;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * We write directly into the execlists->inflight queue and don't use
-	 * the execlists->pending queue, as we don't have a distinct switch
-	 * event.
-	 */
-	port = first;
 	while ((rb = rb_first_cached(&sched_engine->queue))) {
 		struct i915_priolist *p = to_priolist(rb);
 		struct i915_request *rq, *rn;
 
 		priolist_for_each_request_consume(rq, rn, p) {
-			if (last && rq->context != last->context) {
-				if (port == last_port)
-					goto done;
-
-				*port = schedule_in(last,
-						    port - execlists->inflight);
-				port++;
-			}
+			if (last && rq->context != last->context)
+				goto done;
 
 			list_del_init(&rq->sched.link);
+
 			__i915_request_submit(rq);
-			submit = true;
+
+			trace_i915_request_in(rq, 0);
 			last = rq;
+			submit = true;
 		}
 
 		rb_erase_cached(&p->node, &sched_engine->queue);
 		i915_priolist_free(p);
 	}
 done:
-	sched_engine->queue_priority_hint =
-		rb ? to_priolist(rb)->priority : INT_MIN;
 	if (submit) {
-		*port = schedule_in(last, port - execlists->inflight);
-		*++port = NULL;
-		guc_submit(engine, first, port);
+		last->context->lrc_reg_state[CTX_RING_TAIL] =
+			intel_ring_set_tail(last->ring, last->tail);
+resubmit:
+		/*
+		 * We only check for -EBUSY here even though it is possible for
+		 * -EDEADLK to be returned. If -EDEADLK is returned, the GuC has
+		 * died and a full GPU needs to be done. The hangcheck will
+		 * eventually detect that the GuC has died and trigger this
+		 * reset so no need to handle -EDEADLK here.
+		 */
+		ret = guc_add_request(guc, last);
+		if (ret == -EBUSY) {
+			i915_sched_engine_kick(sched_engine);
+			guc->stalled_request = last;
+			return false;
+		}
 	}
-	execlists->active = execlists->inflight;
+
+	guc->stalled_request = NULL;
+	return submit;
 }
 
 static void guc_submission_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 {
 	struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine =
 		from_tasklet(sched_engine, t, tasklet);
-	struct intel_engine_cs * const engine = sched_engine->engine;
-	struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
-	struct i915_request **port, *rq;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	bool loop;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
-
-	for (port = execlists->inflight; (rq = *port); port++) {
-		if (!i915_request_completed(rq))
-			break;
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
 
-		schedule_out(rq);
-	}
-	if (port != execlists->inflight) {
-		int idx = port - execlists->inflight;
-		int rem = ARRAY_SIZE(execlists->inflight) - idx;
-		memmove(execlists->inflight, port, rem * sizeof(*port));
-	}
-
-	__guc_dequeue(engine);
+	do {
+		loop = guc_dequeue_one_context(&sched_engine->engine->gt->uc.guc);
+	} while (loop);
 
-	i915_sched_engine_reset_on_empty(engine->sched_engine);
+	i915_sched_engine_reset_on_empty(sched_engine);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void cs_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u16 iir)
 {
-	if (iir & GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT) {
+	if (iir & GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT)
 		intel_engine_signal_breadcrumbs(engine);
-		i915_sched_engine_hi_kick(engine->sched_engine);
-	}
 }
 
 static void guc_reset_prepare(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -351,6 +330,10 @@ static void guc_reset_cancel(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	struct rb_node *rb;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	/* Can be called during boot if GuC fails to load */
+	if (!engine->gt)
+		return;
+
 	ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "\n");
 
 	/*
@@ -437,8 +420,11 @@ int intel_guc_submission_init(struct intel_guc *guc)
 
 void intel_guc_submission_fini(struct intel_guc *guc)
 {
-	if (guc->lrc_desc_pool)
-		guc_lrc_desc_pool_destroy(guc);
+	if (!guc->lrc_desc_pool)
+		return;
+
+	guc_lrc_desc_pool_destroy(guc);
+	i915_sched_engine_put(guc->sched_engine);
 }
 
 static int guc_context_alloc(struct intel_context *ce)
@@ -503,32 +489,32 @@ static int guc_request_alloc(struct i915_request *request)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline void queue_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+static inline void queue_request(struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine,
 				 struct i915_request *rq,
 				 int prio)
 {
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->sched.link));
 	list_add_tail(&rq->sched.link,
-		      i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine->sched_engine, prio));
+		      i915_sched_lookup_priolist(sched_engine, prio));
 	set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
 }
 
 static void guc_submit_request(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
-	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = rq->engine;
+	struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine = rq->engine->sched_engine;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/* Will be called from irq-context when using foreign fences. */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
 
-	queue_request(engine, rq, rq_prio(rq));
+	queue_request(sched_engine, rq, rq_prio(rq));
 
-	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_sched_engine_is_empty(engine->sched_engine));
+	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_sched_engine_is_empty(sched_engine));
 	GEM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&rq->sched.link));
 
-	i915_sched_engine_hi_kick(engine->sched_engine);
+	i915_sched_engine_hi_kick(sched_engine);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void sanitize_hwsp(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -606,8 +592,6 @@ static void guc_release(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
 	engine->sanitize = NULL; /* no longer in control, nothing to sanitize */
 
-	tasklet_kill(&engine->sched_engine->tasklet);
-
 	intel_engine_cleanup_common(engine);
 	lrc_fini_wa_ctx(engine);
 }
@@ -678,6 +662,7 @@ static inline void guc_default_irqs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 int intel_guc_submission_setup(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = engine->i915;
+	struct intel_guc *guc = &engine->gt->uc.guc;
 
 	/*
 	 * The setup relies on several assumptions (e.g. irqs always enabled)
@@ -685,8 +670,18 @@ int intel_guc_submission_setup(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	 */
 	GEM_BUG_ON(INTEL_GEN(i915) < 11);
 
-	tasklet_setup(&engine->sched_engine->tasklet, guc_submission_tasklet);
-	engine->sched_engine->schedule = i915_schedule;
+	if (!guc->sched_engine) {
+		guc->sched_engine = i915_sched_engine_create(ENGINE_VIRTUAL);
+		if (!guc->sched_engine)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		guc->sched_engine->schedule = i915_schedule;
+		guc->sched_engine->engine = engine;
+		tasklet_setup(&guc->sched_engine->tasklet,
+			      guc_submission_tasklet);
+	}
+	i915_sched_engine_put(engine->sched_engine);
+	engine->sched_engine = i915_sched_engine_get(guc->sched_engine);
 
 	guc_default_vfuncs(engine);
 	guc_default_irqs(engine);
-- 
2.28.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-06 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 504+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-06 19:13 [RFC PATCH 00/97] Basic GuC submission support in the i915 Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 01/97] drm/i915/gt: Move engine setup out of set_default_submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-19  0:25   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-19  0:25     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  8:44   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25  8:44     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 02/97] drm/i915/gt: Move submission_method into intel_gt Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-19  3:10   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-19  3:10     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  8:44   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25  8:44     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 03/97] drm/i915/gt: Move CS interrupt handler to the backend Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-19  3:31   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-19  3:31     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  8:45   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25  8:45     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 04/97] drm/i915/guc: skip disabling CTBs before sanitizing the GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-20 16:47   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-20 16:47     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 05/97] drm/i915/guc: use probe_error log for CT enablement failure Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 10:30   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 10:30     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 06/97] drm/i915/guc: enable only the user interrupt when using GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  0:31   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  0:31     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 07/97] drm/i915/guc: Remove sample_forcewake h2g action Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 10:48   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 10:48     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25  0:36   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  0:36     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 08/97] drm/i915/guc: Keep strict GuC ABI definitions Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 23:52   ` Michał Winiarski
2021-05-24 23:52     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michał Winiarski
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 09/97] drm/i915/guc: Stop using fence/status from CTB descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  2:38   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  2:38     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 10/97] drm/i915: Promote ptrdiff() to i915_utils.h Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  0:42   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  0:42     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 11/97] drm/i915/guc: Only rely on own CTB size Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  2:47   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  2:47     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 12:48     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 12:48       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 12/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't repeat CTB layout calculations Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  2:53   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  2:53     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 13:07     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 13:07       ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 16:56       ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 16:56         ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 13/97] drm/i915/guc: Replace CTB array with explicit members Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  3:15   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  3:15     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 14/97] drm/i915/guc: Update sizes of CTB buffers Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  2:56   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  2:56     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 15/97] drm/i915/guc: Relax CTB response timeout Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:08   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:08     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 19:37     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 19:37       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 16/97] drm/i915/guc: Start protecting access to CTB descriptors Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  3:21   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  3:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 13:10     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25  3:21   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  3:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 17/97] drm/i915/guc: Stop using mutex while sending CTB messages Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 16:14   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 16:14     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 18/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't receive all G2H messages in irq handler Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:15   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:15     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 19:43     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 19:43       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 19/97] drm/i915/guc: Always copy CT message to new allocation Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:25   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:25     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 20/97] drm/i915/guc: Introduce unified HXG messages Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:16   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 15:16     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:59     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 17:59       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 22:11     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-11 22:11       ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-12  8:40       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-12  8:40         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 21/97] drm/i915/guc: Update MMIO based communication Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 22/97] drm/i915/guc: Update CTB response status Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 23/97] drm/i915/guc: Support per context scheduling policies Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  1:15   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  1:15     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 24/97] drm/i915/guc: Add flag for mark broken CTB Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 19:44   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 19:44     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 25/97] drm/i915/guc: New definition of the CTB descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 26/97] drm/i915/guc: New definition of the CTB registration action Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 27/97] drm/i915/guc: New CTB based communication Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 28/97] drm/i915/guc: Kill guc_clients.ct_pool Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  1:01   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  1:01     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 29/97] drm/i915/guc: Update firmware to v60.1.2 Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 30/97] drm/i915/uc: turn on GuC/HuC auto mode by default Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 11:00   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 11:00     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 31/97] drm/i915/guc: Early initialization of GuC send registers Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 20:28   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 20:28     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 32/97] drm/i915: Introduce i915_sched_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:18   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 15:18     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:56     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 17:56       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 33/97] drm/i915: Engine relative MMIO Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  9:05   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25  9:05     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 34/97] drm/i915/guc: Use guc_class instead of engine_class in fw interface Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 20:41   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 20:41     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 35/97] drm/i915/guc: Improve error message for unsolicited CT response Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 11:59   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 11:59     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 17:32     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 17:32       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 36/97] drm/i915/guc: Add non blocking CTB send function Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 12:21   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 17:30     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 17:30       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  9:21   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25  9:21     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:21     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 17:21       ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26  8:57       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26  8:57         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:10         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 18:10           ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 10:02           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 10:02             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 14:35             ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 14:35               ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 15:11               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 15:11                 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-07 17:31                 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-07 17:31                   ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-08  8:39                   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-08  8:39                     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-08  8:46                     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-08  8:46                       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-09 23:10                       ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-09 23:10                         ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-10 15:27                         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-10 15:27                           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 16:38                           ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 16:38                             ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 17:25                             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 17:25                               ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-09 13:58                     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-09 13:58                       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-09 23:05                       ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-09 23:05                         ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-09 14:14                   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-09 14:14                     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-09 23:13                     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-09 23:13                       ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 37/97] drm/i915/guc: Add stall timer to " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 12:58   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 12:58     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 18:35     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 18:35       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 14:15       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 14:15         ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 16:54         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 16:54           ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 38/97] drm/i915/guc: Optimize CTB writes and reads Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 13:31   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 13:31     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 17:39     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 17:39       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 39/97] drm/i915/guc: Increase size of CTB buffers Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 13:43   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 13:43     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 18:40     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 18:40       ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  9:24   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25  9:24     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:15     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 17:15       ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26  9:30       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26  9:30         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:20         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 18:20           ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 40/97] drm/i915/guc: Module load failure test for CT buffer creation Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 13:45   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 13:45     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 41/97] drm/i915/guc: Add new GuC interface defines and structures Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 42/97] drm/i915/guc: Remove GuC stage descriptor, add lrc descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 43/97] drm/i915/guc: Add lrc descriptor context lookup array Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:26   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 15:26     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:01     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 17:01       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 17:43       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:43         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 19:34         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 19:34           ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 44/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC submission tasklet Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  9:43   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25  9:43     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:10     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 17:10       ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 45/97] drm/i915/guc: Add bypass tasklet submission path to GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 46/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC context operations for new inteface Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-29 20:32   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-29 20:32     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 47/97] drm/i915/guc: Insert fence on context when deregistering Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 48/97] drm/i915/guc: Defer context unpin until scheduling is disabled Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 49/97] drm/i915/guc: Disable engine barriers with GuC during unpin Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 15:37     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 16:31     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 16:31       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 10:26   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 10:26     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 50/97] drm/i915/guc: Extend deregistration fence to schedule disable Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 51/97] drm/i915: Disable preempt busywait when using GuC scheduling Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 52/97] drm/i915/guc: Ensure request ordering via completion fences Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 53/97] drm/i915/guc: Disable semaphores when using GuC scheduling Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  9:52   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25  9:52     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:01     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 17:01       ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26  9:25       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26  9:25         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:15         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 18:15           ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27  8:41           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27  8:41             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 14:38             ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 14:38               ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 54/97] drm/i915/guc: Ensure G2H response has space in buffer Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 55/97] drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-07  5:56   ` kernel test robot
2021-05-25 10:06   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 10:06     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:07     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 17:07       ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26  9:21       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26  9:21         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:18         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 18:18           ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27  9:02           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27  9:02             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 14:37             ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 14:37               ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 56/97] drm/i915/guc: Update GuC debugfs to support new GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 57/97] drm/i915/guc: Add several request trace points Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 58/97] drm/i915: Add intel_context tracing Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 59/97] drm/i915/guc: GuC virtual engines Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 60/97] drm/i915: Track 'serial' counts for " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 10:16   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 10:16     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:52     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 17:52       ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26  8:40       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26  8:40         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:45         ` John Harrison
2021-05-26 18:45           ` John Harrison
2021-05-27  8:53           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27  8:53             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 17:01             ` John Harrison
2021-05-27 17:01               ` John Harrison
2021-06-01  9:31               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-01  9:31                 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02  1:20                 ` John Harrison
2021-06-02  1:20                   ` John Harrison
2021-06-02 12:04                   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 12:04                     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 12:09   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 12:09     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 61/97] drm/i915: Hold reference to intel_context over life of i915_request Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 12:18   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 12:18     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 62/97] drm/i915/guc: Disable bonding extension with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 63/97] drm/i915/guc: Direct all breadcrumbs for a class to single breadcrumbs Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 13:31   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 13:31     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 64/97] drm/i915/guc: Reset implementation for new GuC interface Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 14:33   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 14:33     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-04  3:17     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-04  3:17       ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-04  8:16       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-04  8:16         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-04 18:02         ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-04 18:02           ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 65/97] drm/i915: Reset GPU immediately if submission is disabled Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 14:36   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 14:36     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 66/97] drm/i915/guc: Add disable interrupts to guc sanitize Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-11  8:16   ` [drm/i915/guc] 07336fb545: WARNING:at_drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c:#__uc_sanitize[i915] kernel test robot
2021-05-11  8:16     ` kernel test robot
2021-05-11  8:16     ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-05-11  8:16     ` kernel test robot
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 67/97] drm/i915/guc: Suspend/resume implementation for new interface Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 68/97] drm/i915/guc: Handle context reset notification Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 16:25   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 16:25     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 69/97] drm/i915/guc: Handle engine reset failure notification Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 70/97] drm/i915/guc: Enable the timer expired interrupt for GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 71/97] drm/i915/guc: Provide mmio list to be saved/restored on engine reset Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 72/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't complain about reset races Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 73/97] drm/i915/guc: Enable GuC engine reset Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 74/97] drm/i915/guc: Capture error state on context reset Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 16:28   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 16:28     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:12     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 17:12       ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 17:45       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:45         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 75/97] drm/i915/guc: Fix for error capture after full GPU reset with GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 76/97] drm/i915/guc: Hook GuC scheduling policies up Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 77/97] drm/i915/guc: Connect reset modparam updates to GuC policy flags Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 78/97] drm/i915/guc: Include scheduling policies in the debugfs state dump Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 79/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't call ring_is_idle in GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 80/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement banned contexts for " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 81/97] drm/i915/guc: Allow flexible number of context ids Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 82/97] drm/i915/guc: Connect the number of guc_ids to debugfs Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 83/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't return -EAGAIN to user when guc_ids exhausted Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-07  6:06   ` kernel test robot
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 84/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't allow requests not ready to consume all guc_ids Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 85/97] drm/i915/guc: Introduce guc_submit_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 86/97] drm/i915/guc: Add golden context to GuC ADS Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 87/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC priority management Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 88/97] drm/i915/guc: Support request cancellation Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 89/97] drm/i915/guc: Check return of __xa_store when registering a context Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 90/97] drm/i915/guc: Non-static lrc descriptor registration buffer Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 91/97] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 92/97] drm/i915: Add GT PM delayed worker Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 93/97] drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 94/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't call switch_to_kernel_context " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 95/97] drm/i915/guc: Selftest for GuC flow control Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 96/97] drm/i915/guc: Update GuC documentation Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 97/97] drm/i915/guc: Unblock GuC submission on Gen11+ Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-09 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH 00/97] Basic GuC submission support in the i915 Martin Peres
2021-05-09 17:12   ` [Intel-gfx] " Martin Peres
2021-05-09 23:11   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-09 23:11     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-10 13:55     ` Martin Peres
2021-05-10 13:55       ` [Intel-gfx] " Martin Peres
2021-05-10 16:25       ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-10 16:25         ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-11  8:01         ` Martin Peres
2021-05-11  8:01           ` [Intel-gfx] " Martin Peres
2021-05-10 16:33       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-10 16:33         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-10 18:30         ` Francisco Jerez
2021-05-10 18:30           ` Francisco Jerez
2021-05-11  8:06         ` Martin Peres
2021-05-11  8:06           ` [Intel-gfx] " Martin Peres
2021-05-11 15:26           ` Bloomfield, Jon
2021-05-11 15:26             ` [Intel-gfx] " Bloomfield, Jon
2021-05-11 16:39             ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 16:39               ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-05-12  6:26               ` Martin Peres
2021-05-12  6:26                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Martin Peres
2021-05-14 16:31                 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-14 16:31                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-25 15:37                   ` Alex Deucher
2021-05-25 15:37                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher
2021-05-11  2:58     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-05-11  2:58       ` [Intel-gfx] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-05-11  7:47       ` Martin Peres
2021-05-11  7:47         ` [Intel-gfx] " Martin Peres
2021-05-14 11:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14 11:11   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14 16:36   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-14 16:36     ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-14 16:46     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-14 16:46       ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-14 16:41   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-14 16:41     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 10:32 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 10:32   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 16:45   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 16:45     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 15:27     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 15:27       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 18:57       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-02 18:57         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-03  3:41         ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-03  3:41           ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-03  4:47           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-03  4:47             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-03  9:49             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03  9:49               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03 10:52           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03 10:52             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03  4:10       ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-03  4:10         ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-03  8:51         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03  8:51           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03 16:34           ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-03 16:34             ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210506191451.77768-45-matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jason.ekstrand@intel.com \
    --cc=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    --cc=jon.bloomfield@intel.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.