All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Xu <jacobhxu@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jacob Xu <jacobhxu@google.com>
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] x86: Do not assign values to unaligned pointer to 128 bits
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 18:50:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511015016.815461-1-jacobhxu@google.com> (raw)

When compiled with clang, the following statement gets converted into a
movaps instructions.
mem->u[0] = 5; mem->u[1] = 6; mem->u[2] = 7; mem->u[3] = 8;

Since mem is an unaligned pointer to sse_union, we get a GP when
running. Let's avoid using a pointer to sse_union at all, since doing so
implies that the pointer is aligned to 128 bits.

Fixes: e5e76263b5 ("x86: add additional test cases for sse exceptions to
emulator.c")

Signed-off-by: Jacob Xu <jacobhxu@google.com>
---
 x86/emulator.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/x86/emulator.c b/x86/emulator.c
index 9705073..1d5c172 100644
--- a/x86/emulator.c
+++ b/x86/emulator.c
@@ -645,37 +645,34 @@ static void test_muldiv(long *mem)
 
 typedef unsigned __attribute__((vector_size(16))) sse128;
 
-typedef union {
-    sse128 sse;
-    unsigned u[4];
-} sse_union;
-
-static bool sseeq(sse_union *v1, sse_union *v2)
+static bool sseeq(uint32_t *v1, uint32_t *v2)
 {
     bool ok = true;
     int i;
 
     for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
-	ok &= v1->u[i] == v2->u[i];
+	ok &= v1[i] == v2[i];
     }
 
     return ok;
 }
 
-static __attribute__((target("sse2"))) void test_sse(sse_union *mem)
+static __attribute__((target("sse2"))) void test_sse(uint32_t *mem)
 {
-	sse_union v;
+	sse128 vv;
+	uint32_t *v = (uint32_t *)&vv;
 
 	write_cr0(read_cr0() & ~6); /* EM, TS */
 	write_cr4(read_cr4() | 0x200); /* OSFXSR */
+	memset(&vv, 0, sizeof(vv));
 
 #define TEST_RW_SSE(insn) do { \
-		v.u[0] = 1; v.u[1] = 2; v.u[2] = 3; v.u[3] = 4; \
-		asm(insn " %1, %0" : "=m"(*mem) : "x"(v.sse)); \
-		report(sseeq(&v, mem), insn " (read)"); \
-		mem->u[0] = 5; mem->u[1] = 6; mem->u[2] = 7; mem->u[3] = 8; \
-		asm(insn " %1, %0" : "=x"(v.sse) : "m"(*mem)); \
-		report(sseeq(&v, mem), insn " (write)"); \
+		v[0] = 1; v[1] = 2; v[2] = 3; v[3] = 4; \
+		asm(insn " %1, %0" : "=m"(*mem) : "x"(vv) : "memory"); \
+		report(sseeq(v, mem), insn " (read)"); \
+		mem[0] = 5; mem[1] = 6; mem[2] = 7; mem[3] = 8; \
+		asm(insn " %1, %0" : "=x"(vv) : "m"(*mem) : "memory"); \
+		report(sseeq(v, mem), insn " (write)"); \
 } while (0)
 
 	TEST_RW_SSE("movdqu");
@@ -704,40 +701,41 @@ static void cross_movups_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
 
 static __attribute__((target("sse2"))) void test_sse_exceptions(void *cross_mem)
 {
-	sse_union v;
-	sse_union *mem;
+	sse128 vv;
+	uint32_t *v = (uint32_t *)&vv;
+	uint32_t *mem;
 	uint8_t *bytes = cross_mem; // aligned on PAGE_SIZE*2
 	void *page2 = (void *)(&bytes[4096]);
 	struct pte_search search;
 	pteval_t orig_pte;
 
 	// setup memory for unaligned access
-	mem = (sse_union *)(&bytes[8]);
+	mem = (uint32_t *)(&bytes[8]);
 
 	// test unaligned access for movups, movupd and movaps
-	v.u[0] = 1; v.u[1] = 2; v.u[2] = 3; v.u[3] = 4;
-	mem->u[0] = 5; mem->u[1] = 6; mem->u[2] = 7; mem->u[3] = 8;
-	asm("movups %1, %0" : "=m"(*mem) : "x"(v.sse));
-	report(sseeq(&v, mem), "movups unaligned");
-
-	v.u[0] = 1; v.u[1] = 2; v.u[2] = 3; v.u[3] = 4;
-	mem->u[0] = 5; mem->u[1] = 6; mem->u[2] = 7; mem->u[3] = 8;
-	asm("movupd %1, %0" : "=m"(*mem) : "x"(v.sse));
-	report(sseeq(&v, mem), "movupd unaligned");
+	v[0] = 1; v[1] = 2; v[2] = 3; v[3] = 4;
+	mem[0] = 5; mem[1] = 6; mem[2] = 8; mem[3] = 9;
+	asm("movups %1, %0" : "=m"(*mem) : "x"(vv) : "memory");
+	report(sseeq(v, mem), "movups unaligned");
+
+	v[0] = 1; v[1] = 2; v[2] = 3; v[3] = 4;
+	mem[0] = 5; mem[1] = 6; mem[2] = 7; mem[3] = 8;
+	asm("movupd %1, %0" : "=m"(*mem) : "x"(vv) : "memory");
+	report(sseeq(v, mem), "movupd unaligned");
 	exceptions = 0;
 	handle_exception(GP_VECTOR, unaligned_movaps_handler);
 	asm("movaps %1, %0\n\t unaligned_movaps_cont:"
-			: "=m"(*mem) : "x"(v.sse));
+			: "=m"(*mem) : "x"(vv));
 	handle_exception(GP_VECTOR, 0);
 	report(exceptions == 1, "unaligned movaps exception");
 
 	// setup memory for cross page access
-	mem = (sse_union *)(&bytes[4096-8]);
-	v.u[0] = 1; v.u[1] = 2; v.u[2] = 3; v.u[3] = 4;
-	mem->u[0] = 5; mem->u[1] = 6; mem->u[2] = 7; mem->u[3] = 8;
+	mem = (uint32_t *)(&bytes[4096-8]);
+	v[0] = 1; v[1] = 2; v[2] = 3; v[3] = 4;
+	mem[0] = 5; mem[1] = 6; mem[2] = 7; mem[3] = 8;
 
-	asm("movups %1, %0" : "=m"(*mem) : "x"(v.sse));
-	report(sseeq(&v, mem), "movups unaligned crosspage");
+	asm("movups %1, %0" : "=m"(*mem) : "x"(vv) : "memory");
+	report(sseeq(v, mem), "movups unaligned crosspage");
 
 	// invalidate second page
 	search = find_pte_level(current_page_table(), page2, 1);
@@ -747,7 +745,8 @@ static __attribute__((target("sse2"))) void test_sse_exceptions(void *cross_mem)
 
 	exceptions = 0;
 	handle_exception(PF_VECTOR, cross_movups_handler);
-	asm("movups %1, %0\n\t cross_movups_cont:" : "=m"(*mem) : "x"(v.sse));
+	asm("movups %1, %0\n\t cross_movups_cont:" : "=m"(*mem) : "x"(vv) :
+			"memory");
 	handle_exception(PF_VECTOR, 0);
 	report(exceptions == 1, "movups crosspage exception");
 
-- 
2.31.1.607.g51e8a6a459-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2021-05-11  1:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-11  1:50 Jacob Xu [this message]
2021-05-11  1:50 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] x86: remove use of compiler's memset from emulator.c Jacob Xu
2021-05-11 21:13   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-10 16:14 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] x86: Do not assign values to unaligned pointer to 128 bits Jacob Xu
2021-06-10 16:55   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210511015016.815461-1-jacobhxu@google.com \
    --to=jacobhxu@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.