All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
	shakeelb@google.com, guro@fb.com, shy828301@gmail.com,
	alexs@kernel.org, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, david@fromorbit.com,
	trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, anna.schumaker@netapp.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
	fam.zheng@bytedance.com, Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 14/17] nfs42: use a specific kmem_cache to allocate nfs4_xattr_entry
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 18:46:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511104647.604-15-songmuchun@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511104647.604-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>

If we want to add the allocated objects to its list_lru, we should use
kmem_cache_alloc_lru() to allocate objects. So intruduce
nfs4_xattr_entry_cachep which is used to allocate nfs4_xattr_entry.

Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
 fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c b/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c
index 1c4d2a05b401..5b7af9080db0 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ struct nfs4_xattr_entry {
 	struct hlist_node hnode;
 	struct list_head lru;
 	struct list_head dispose;
-	char *xattr_name;
+	const char *xattr_name;
 	void *xattr_value;
 	size_t xattr_size;
 	struct nfs4_xattr_bucket *bucket;
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ static struct list_lru nfs4_xattr_entry_lru;
 static struct list_lru nfs4_xattr_large_entry_lru;
 
 static struct kmem_cache *nfs4_xattr_cache_cachep;
+static struct kmem_cache *nfs4_xattr_entry_cachep;
 
 /*
  * Hashing helper functions.
@@ -177,49 +178,27 @@ nfs4_xattr_alloc_entry(const char *name, const void *value,
 {
 	struct nfs4_xattr_entry *entry;
 	void *valp;
-	char *namep;
-	size_t alloclen, slen;
-	char *buf;
-	uint32_t flags;
+	const char *namep;
+	uint32_t flags = len > PAGE_SIZE ? NFS4_XATTR_ENTRY_EXTVAL : 0;
+	gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | GFP_NOFS;
+	struct list_lru *lru;
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct nfs4_xattr_entry) +
 	    XATTR_NAME_MAX + 1 > PAGE_SIZE);
 
-	alloclen = sizeof(struct nfs4_xattr_entry);
-	if (name != NULL) {
-		slen = strlen(name) + 1;
-		alloclen += slen;
-	} else
-		slen = 0;
-
-	if (alloclen + len <= PAGE_SIZE) {
-		alloclen += len;
-		flags = 0;
-	} else {
-		flags = NFS4_XATTR_ENTRY_EXTVAL;
-	}
-
-	buf = kmalloc(alloclen, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | GFP_NOFS);
-	if (buf == NULL)
+	lru = flags & NFS4_XATTR_ENTRY_EXTVAL ? &nfs4_xattr_large_entry_lru :
+	      &nfs4_xattr_entry_lru;
+	entry = kmem_cache_alloc_lru(nfs4_xattr_entry_cachep, lru, gfp);
+	if (!entry)
 		return NULL;
-	entry = (struct nfs4_xattr_entry *)buf;
-
-	if (name != NULL) {
-		namep = buf + sizeof(struct nfs4_xattr_entry);
-		memcpy(namep, name, slen);
-	} else {
-		namep = NULL;
-	}
-
-
-	if (flags & NFS4_XATTR_ENTRY_EXTVAL) {
-		valp = kvmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | GFP_NOFS);
-		if (valp == NULL) {
-			kfree(buf);
-			return NULL;
-		}
-	} else if (len != 0) {
-		valp = buf + sizeof(struct nfs4_xattr_entry) + slen;
+	namep = kstrdup_const(name, gfp);
+	if (!namep && name)
+		goto free_buf;
+
+	if (len != 0) {
+		valp = kvmalloc(len, gfp);
+		if (!valp)
+			goto free_name;
 	} else
 		valp = NULL;
 
@@ -232,23 +211,23 @@ nfs4_xattr_alloc_entry(const char *name, const void *value,
 
 	entry->flags = flags;
 	entry->xattr_value = valp;
-	kref_init(&entry->ref);
 	entry->xattr_name = namep;
 	entry->xattr_size = len;
-	entry->bucket = NULL;
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->lru);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->dispose);
-	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&entry->hnode);
 
 	return entry;
+free_name:
+	kfree_const(namep);
+free_buf:
+	kmem_cache_free(nfs4_xattr_entry_cachep, entry);
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 static void
 nfs4_xattr_free_entry(struct nfs4_xattr_entry *entry)
 {
-	if (entry->flags & NFS4_XATTR_ENTRY_EXTVAL)
-		kvfree(entry->xattr_value);
-	kfree(entry);
+	kvfree(entry->xattr_value);
+	kfree_const(entry->xattr_name);
+	kmem_cache_free(nfs4_xattr_entry_cachep, entry);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -289,7 +268,7 @@ nfs4_xattr_alloc_cache(void)
 {
 	struct nfs4_xattr_cache *cache;
 
-	cache = kmem_cache_alloc(nfs4_xattr_cache_cachep,
+	cache = kmem_cache_alloc_lru(nfs4_xattr_cache_cachep, &nfs4_xattr_cache_lru,
 	    GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | GFP_NOFS);
 	if (cache == NULL)
 		return NULL;
@@ -992,6 +971,17 @@ static void nfs4_xattr_cache_init_once(void *p)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->dispose);
 }
 
+static void nfs4_xattr_entry_init_once(void *p)
+{
+	struct nfs4_xattr_entry *entry = p;
+
+	kref_init(&entry->ref);
+	entry->bucket = NULL;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->lru);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->dispose);
+	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&entry->hnode);
+}
+
 int __init nfs4_xattr_cache_init(void)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -1003,6 +993,13 @@ int __init nfs4_xattr_cache_init(void)
 	if (nfs4_xattr_cache_cachep == NULL)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	nfs4_xattr_entry_cachep = kmem_cache_create("nfs4_xattr_entry",
+			sizeof(struct nfs4_xattr_entry), 0,
+			(SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT | SLAB_MEM_SPREAD | SLAB_ACCOUNT),
+			nfs4_xattr_entry_init_once);
+	if (!nfs4_xattr_entry_cachep)
+		goto out5;
+
 	ret = list_lru_init_memcg(&nfs4_xattr_large_entry_lru,
 	    &nfs4_xattr_large_entry_shrinker);
 	if (ret)
@@ -1040,6 +1037,8 @@ int __init nfs4_xattr_cache_init(void)
 out3:
 	list_lru_destroy(&nfs4_xattr_large_entry_lru);
 out4:
+	kmem_cache_destroy(nfs4_xattr_entry_cachep);
+out5:
 	kmem_cache_destroy(nfs4_xattr_cache_cachep);
 
 	return ret;
-- 
2.11.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-11 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-11 10:46 [PATCH 00/17] Optimize list lru memory consumption Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 01/17] mm: list_lru: fix list_lru_count_one() return value Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 02/17] mm: memcontrol: remove kmemcg_id reparenting Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 03/17] mm: memcontrol: remove the kmem states Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 04/17] mm: memcontrol: move memcg_online_kmem() to mem_cgroup_css_online() Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 05/17] mm: list_lru: remove holding lru node lock Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 06/17] mm: list_lru: only add the memcg aware lrus to the list Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 07/17] mm: list_lru: optimize the array of per memcg lists Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 08/17] mm: list_lru: remove memcg_aware from struct list_lru Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 09/17] mm: introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 10/17] fs: introduce alloc_inode_sb() to allocate filesystems specific inode Muchun Song
2021-05-11 23:40   ` Dave Chinner
2021-05-12  3:20     ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-05-12  3:20       ` Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 11/17] mm: dcache: use kmem_cache_alloc_lru() to allocate dentry Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 12/17] xarray: replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_alloc_lru Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 13/17] mm: workingset: allocate list_lru on xa_node allocation Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 15/17] mm: list_lru: allocate list_lru_one only when needed Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 16/17] mm: list_lru: rename memcg_drain_all_list_lrus to memcg_reparent_list_lrus Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 17/17] mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray Muchun Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210511104647.604-15-songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --to=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexs@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=fam.zheng@bytedance.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.