From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> To: Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@xilinx.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@xilinx.com> Subject: [PATCH] misc: xilinx-sdfec: Drop unnecessary NULL check after container_of Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 13:04:57 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210521200457.2112041-1-linux@roeck-us.net> (raw) container_of() only returns NULL if the passed pointer is NULL _and_ if the embedded element is the first element of the structure. Even if that is the case, testing against it is misleading and possibly dangerous because the position of the embedded element may change. In this case, the check is unnecessary since it is known that file->private_data is never NULL for an open file, and container_of() will therefore also never be NULL. Drop the check. Acked-by: Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> --- change since RFC: Dropped check for the result of container_of() result instead of checking if file->private_data is NULL. drivers/misc/xilinx_sdfec.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/xilinx_sdfec.c b/drivers/misc/xilinx_sdfec.c index 23c8448a9c3b..d6e3c650bd11 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/xilinx_sdfec.c +++ b/drivers/misc/xilinx_sdfec.c @@ -1013,9 +1013,6 @@ static __poll_t xsdfec_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait) xsdfec = container_of(file->private_data, struct xsdfec_dev, miscdev); - if (!xsdfec) - return EPOLLNVAL | EPOLLHUP; - poll_wait(file, &xsdfec->waitq, wait); /* XSDFEC ISR detected an error */ -- 2.25.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> To: Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@xilinx.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@xilinx.com> Subject: [PATCH] misc: xilinx-sdfec: Drop unnecessary NULL check after container_of Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 13:04:57 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210521200457.2112041-1-linux@roeck-us.net> (raw) container_of() only returns NULL if the passed pointer is NULL _and_ if the embedded element is the first element of the structure. Even if that is the case, testing against it is misleading and possibly dangerous because the position of the embedded element may change. In this case, the check is unnecessary since it is known that file->private_data is never NULL for an open file, and container_of() will therefore also never be NULL. Drop the check. Acked-by: Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> --- change since RFC: Dropped check for the result of container_of() result instead of checking if file->private_data is NULL. drivers/misc/xilinx_sdfec.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/xilinx_sdfec.c b/drivers/misc/xilinx_sdfec.c index 23c8448a9c3b..d6e3c650bd11 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/xilinx_sdfec.c +++ b/drivers/misc/xilinx_sdfec.c @@ -1013,9 +1013,6 @@ static __poll_t xsdfec_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait) xsdfec = container_of(file->private_data, struct xsdfec_dev, miscdev); - if (!xsdfec) - return EPOLLNVAL | EPOLLHUP; - poll_wait(file, &xsdfec->waitq, wait); /* XSDFEC ISR detected an error */ -- 2.25.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 20:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-21 20:04 Guenter Roeck [this message] 2021-05-21 20:04 ` [PATCH] misc: xilinx-sdfec: Drop unnecessary NULL check after container_of Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210521200457.2112041-1-linux@roeck-us.net \ --to=linux@roeck-us.net \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=derek.kiernan@xilinx.com \ --cc=dragan.cvetic@xilinx.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.