All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, joey.gouly@arm.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 12/20] arm64: entry: improve bad_mode()
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 19:32:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210525183302.56293-13-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210525183302.56293-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>

Our use of bad_mode() has a few rough edges:

* AArch64 doesn't use the term "mode", and refers to "Execution
  states", "Exception levels", and "Selected stack pointer".

* We log the exception type (SYNC/IRQ/FIQ/SError), but not the actual
  "mode" (though this can be decoded from the SPSR value).

* We use bad_mode() as a second-level handler for unexpected synchronous
  exceptions, where the "mode" is legitimate, but the specific exception
  is not.

* We dump the ESR value, but call this "code", and so it's not clear to
  all readers that this is the ESR.

... and all of this can be somewhat opaque to those who aren't extremely
familiar with the code.

Let's make this a bit clearer by having bad_mode() log "Unhandled
${TYPE} exception" rather than "Bad mode in ${TYPE} handler", using
"ESR" rather than "code", and having the final panic() log "Unhandled
exception" rather than "Bad mode".

In future we'd like to log the specific architectural vector rather than
just the type of exception, so we also split the core of bad_mode() out
into a helper called __panic_unhandled(), which takes the vector as a
string argument.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
index 25531a0b547e..b43ef1a918a4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
@@ -160,31 +160,32 @@ static void do_interrupt_handler(struct pt_regs *regs,
 extern void (*handle_arch_irq)(struct pt_regs *);
 extern void (*handle_arch_fiq)(struct pt_regs *);
 
-/*
- * bad_mode handles the impossible case in the exception vector. This is always
- * fatal.
- */
-asmlinkage void noinstr bad_mode(struct pt_regs *regs, int reason, unsigned int esr)
+static void noinstr __panic_unhandled(struct pt_regs *regs, const char *vector,
+				      unsigned int esr)
 {
-	const char *handler[] = {
-		"Synchronous Abort",
-		"IRQ",
-		"FIQ",
-		"Error"
-	};
-
 	arm64_enter_nmi(regs);
 
 	console_verbose();
 
-	pr_crit("Bad mode in %s handler detected on CPU%d, code 0x%08x -- %s\n",
-		handler[reason], smp_processor_id(), esr,
+	pr_crit("Unhandled %s exception on CPU%d, ESR 0x%08x -- %s\n",
+		vector, smp_processor_id(), esr,
 		esr_get_class_string(esr));
 
 	__show_regs(regs);
-	panic("bad mode");
+	panic("Unhandled exception");
 }
 
+asmlinkage void noinstr bad_mode(struct pt_regs *regs, int reason, unsigned int esr)
+{
+	const char *handler[] = {
+		"Synchronous Abort",
+		"IRQ",
+		"FIQ",
+		"Error"
+	};
+
+	__panic_unhandled(regs, handler[reason], esr);
+}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1463225
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, __in_cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_wa);
-- 
2.11.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-25 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-25 18:32 [PATCH v3 00/20] arm64: entry: migrate more code to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 01/20] arm64: remove redundant local_daif_mask() in bad_mode() Mark Rutland
2021-05-27 12:34   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 02/20] arm64: entry: unmask IRQ+FIQ after EL0 handling Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 16:47   ` Will Deacon
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 03/20] arm64: entry: convert SError handlers to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 04/20] arm64: entry: move arm64_preempt_schedule_irq to entry-common.c Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 05/20] arm64: entry: move preempt logic to C Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 15:43   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 16:54     ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 06/20] arm64: entry: add a call_on_irq_stack helper Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 07/20] arm64: entry: convert IRQ+FIQ handlers to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 08/20] arm64: entry: organise entry handlers consistently Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 16:51   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 17:39     ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 17:44       ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 18:01         ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 09/20] arm64: entry: organise entry vectors consistently Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 10/20] arm64: entry: consolidate EL1 exception returns Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 11/20] arm64: entry: move bad_mode() to entry-common.c Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 16:57   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 17:42     ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 17:43       ` Will Deacon
2021-05-25 18:32 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 13/20] arm64: entry: template the entry asm functions Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 14/20] arm64: entry: handle all vectors with C Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 17:13   ` Will Deacon
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 15/20] arm64: entry: fold el1_inv() into el1h_64_sync_handler() Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 16/20] arm64: entry: split bad stack entry Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 17/20] arm64: entry: split SDEI entry Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 18/20] arm64: entry: make NMI entry/exit functions static Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 19/20] arm64: entry: don't instrument entry code with KCOV Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 17:16   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 17:49     ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 20/20] arm64: idle: don't instrument idle " Mark Rutland
2021-05-27 14:06 ` [PATCH v3 00/20] arm64: entry: migrate more code to C Catalin Marinas
2021-05-27 15:31 ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210525183302.56293-13-mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.