All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
	alexandru.elisei@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kernel-team@android.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: arm64: Reduce hyp_vmemmap overhead
Date: Wed,  2 Jun 2021 09:43:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210602094347.3730846-1-qperret@google.com> (raw)

Hi all,

This is a v2 of the patch series previously posted here:

  https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210527125134.2116404-1-qperret@google.com/

Please refer to the cover letter of v1 for the context and motivation
behind the series.

Changes since v1:
 - Added comment/doc in page_alloc.c explaining the locking expectations;
 - Removed unnecessary casts in the 'page-to-list-node' helpers;
 - A few other cosmetic changes in the allocator.

Thanks,
Quentin

Quentin Perret (7):
  KVM: arm64: Move hyp_pool locking out of refcount helpers
  KVM: arm64: Use refcount at hyp to check page availability
  KVM: arm64: Remove list_head from hyp_page
  KVM: arm64: Unify MMIO and mem host stage-2 pools
  KVM: arm64: Remove hyp_pool pointer from struct hyp_page
  KVM: arm64: Use less bits for hyp_page order
  KVM: arm64: Use less bits for hyp_page refcount

 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/gfp.h         |  45 +------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h |   2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/memory.h      |   7 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mm.h          |  13 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c         |  60 +++++-----
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c          | 112 +++++++++++++-----
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/setup.c               |  30 +++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/reserved_mem.c             |   3 +-
 8 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)

-- 
2.32.0.rc0.204.g9fa02ecfa5-goog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
	 alexandru.elisei@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: arm64: Reduce hyp_vmemmap overhead
Date: Wed,  2 Jun 2021 09:43:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210602094347.3730846-1-qperret@google.com> (raw)

Hi all,

This is a v2 of the patch series previously posted here:

  https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210527125134.2116404-1-qperret@google.com/

Please refer to the cover letter of v1 for the context and motivation
behind the series.

Changes since v1:
 - Added comment/doc in page_alloc.c explaining the locking expectations;
 - Removed unnecessary casts in the 'page-to-list-node' helpers;
 - A few other cosmetic changes in the allocator.

Thanks,
Quentin

Quentin Perret (7):
  KVM: arm64: Move hyp_pool locking out of refcount helpers
  KVM: arm64: Use refcount at hyp to check page availability
  KVM: arm64: Remove list_head from hyp_page
  KVM: arm64: Unify MMIO and mem host stage-2 pools
  KVM: arm64: Remove hyp_pool pointer from struct hyp_page
  KVM: arm64: Use less bits for hyp_page order
  KVM: arm64: Use less bits for hyp_page refcount

 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/gfp.h         |  45 +------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h |   2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/memory.h      |   7 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mm.h          |  13 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c         |  60 +++++-----
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c          | 112 +++++++++++++-----
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/setup.c               |  30 +++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/reserved_mem.c             |   3 +-
 8 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)

-- 
2.32.0.rc0.204.g9fa02ecfa5-goog

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
	 alexandru.elisei@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,  kernel-team@android.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: arm64: Reduce hyp_vmemmap overhead
Date: Wed,  2 Jun 2021 09:43:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210602094347.3730846-1-qperret@google.com> (raw)

Hi all,

This is a v2 of the patch series previously posted here:

  https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210527125134.2116404-1-qperret@google.com/

Please refer to the cover letter of v1 for the context and motivation
behind the series.

Changes since v1:
 - Added comment/doc in page_alloc.c explaining the locking expectations;
 - Removed unnecessary casts in the 'page-to-list-node' helpers;
 - A few other cosmetic changes in the allocator.

Thanks,
Quentin

Quentin Perret (7):
  KVM: arm64: Move hyp_pool locking out of refcount helpers
  KVM: arm64: Use refcount at hyp to check page availability
  KVM: arm64: Remove list_head from hyp_page
  KVM: arm64: Unify MMIO and mem host stage-2 pools
  KVM: arm64: Remove hyp_pool pointer from struct hyp_page
  KVM: arm64: Use less bits for hyp_page order
  KVM: arm64: Use less bits for hyp_page refcount

 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/gfp.h         |  45 +------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h |   2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/memory.h      |   7 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mm.h          |  13 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c         |  60 +++++-----
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c          | 112 +++++++++++++-----
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/setup.c               |  30 +++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/reserved_mem.c             |   3 +-
 8 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)

-- 
2.32.0.rc0.204.g9fa02ecfa5-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2021-06-02  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-02  9:43 Quentin Perret [this message]
2021-06-02  9:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: arm64: Reduce hyp_vmemmap overhead Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43 ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: arm64: Move hyp_pool locking out of refcount helpers Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43   ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43   ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: arm64: Use refcount at hyp to check page availability Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43   ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43   ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: arm64: Remove list_head from hyp_page Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43   ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43   ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: arm64: Unify MMIO and mem host stage-2 pools Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43   ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43   ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-06 10:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-06 10:31     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-06 10:31     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-07  8:04     ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-07  8:04       ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-07  8:04       ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: arm64: Remove hyp_pool pointer from struct hyp_page Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43   ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43   ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: arm64: Use less bits for hyp_page order Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43   ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43   ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: arm64: Use less bits for hyp_page refcount Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43   ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-02  9:43   ` Quentin Perret

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210602094347.3730846-1-qperret@google.com \
    --to=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.