All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Marek Kedzierski <mkedzier@redhat.com>,
	Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>,
	Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>,
	Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 09/12] ACPI: memhotplug: use a single static memory group for a single memory device
Date: Mon,  7 Jun 2021 21:54:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210607195430.48228-10-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210607195430.48228-1-david@redhat.com>

Let's group all memory we add for a single memory device - we want a
single node for that (which also seems to be the sane thing to do).

We won't care for now about memory that was already added to the system
(e.g., via e820) -- usually *all* memory of a memory device was already
added and we'll fail acpi_memory_enable_device().

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
index eb4faf7c5cad..0c7b062c0e5d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct acpi_memory_info {
 struct acpi_memory_device {
 	struct acpi_device *device;
 	struct list_head res_list;
+	int mgid;
 };
 
 static acpi_status
@@ -171,10 +172,31 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
 	acpi_handle handle = mem_device->device->handle;
 	int result, num_enabled = 0;
 	struct acpi_memory_info *info;
-	mhp_t mhp_flags = MHP_NONE;
-	int node;
+	mhp_t mhp_flags = MHP_NID_IS_MGID;
+	u64 total_length = 0;
+	int node, mgid;
 
 	node = acpi_get_node(handle);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(info, &mem_device->res_list, list) {
+		if (!info->length)
+			continue;
+		/* We want a single node for the whole memory group */
+		if (node < 0)
+			node = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(info->start_addr);
+		total_length += info->length;
+	}
+
+	if (!total_length) {
+		dev_err(&mem_device->device->dev, "device is empty\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	mgid = register_static_memory_group(node, PFN_UP(total_length));
+	if (mgid < 0)
+		return mgid;
+	mem_device->mgid = mgid;
+
 	/*
 	 * Tell the VM there is more memory here...
 	 * Note: Assume that this function returns zero on success
@@ -188,12 +210,10 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
 		 */
 		if (!info->length)
 			continue;
-		if (node < 0)
-			node = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(info->start_addr);
 
 		if (mhp_supports_memmap_on_memory(info->length))
 			mhp_flags |= MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY;
-		result = __add_memory(node, info->start_addr, info->length,
+		result = __add_memory(mgid, info->start_addr, info->length,
 				      mhp_flags);
 
 		/*
@@ -253,6 +273,10 @@ static void acpi_memory_device_free(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
 	if (!mem_device)
 		return;
 
+	/* In case we succeeded adding *some* memory, unregistering fails. */
+	if (mem_device->mgid >= 0)
+		unregister_memory_group(mem_device->mgid);
+
 	acpi_memory_free_device_resources(mem_device);
 	mem_device->device->driver_data = NULL;
 	kfree(mem_device);
@@ -273,6 +297,7 @@ static int acpi_memory_device_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mem_device->res_list);
 	mem_device->device = device;
+	mem_device->mgid = -1;
 	sprintf(acpi_device_name(device), "%s", ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_NAME);
 	sprintf(acpi_device_class(device), "%s", ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_CLASS);
 	device->driver_data = mem_device;
-- 
2.31.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Marek Kedzierski <mkedzier@redhat.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 09/12] ACPI: memhotplug: use a single static memory group for a single memory device
Date: Mon,  7 Jun 2021 21:54:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210607195430.48228-10-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210607195430.48228-1-david@redhat.com>

Let's group all memory we add for a single memory device - we want a
single node for that (which also seems to be the sane thing to do).

We won't care for now about memory that was already added to the system
(e.g., via e820) -- usually *all* memory of a memory device was already
added and we'll fail acpi_memory_enable_device().

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
index eb4faf7c5cad..0c7b062c0e5d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct acpi_memory_info {
 struct acpi_memory_device {
 	struct acpi_device *device;
 	struct list_head res_list;
+	int mgid;
 };
 
 static acpi_status
@@ -171,10 +172,31 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
 	acpi_handle handle = mem_device->device->handle;
 	int result, num_enabled = 0;
 	struct acpi_memory_info *info;
-	mhp_t mhp_flags = MHP_NONE;
-	int node;
+	mhp_t mhp_flags = MHP_NID_IS_MGID;
+	u64 total_length = 0;
+	int node, mgid;
 
 	node = acpi_get_node(handle);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(info, &mem_device->res_list, list) {
+		if (!info->length)
+			continue;
+		/* We want a single node for the whole memory group */
+		if (node < 0)
+			node = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(info->start_addr);
+		total_length += info->length;
+	}
+
+	if (!total_length) {
+		dev_err(&mem_device->device->dev, "device is empty\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	mgid = register_static_memory_group(node, PFN_UP(total_length));
+	if (mgid < 0)
+		return mgid;
+	mem_device->mgid = mgid;
+
 	/*
 	 * Tell the VM there is more memory here...
 	 * Note: Assume that this function returns zero on success
@@ -188,12 +210,10 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
 		 */
 		if (!info->length)
 			continue;
-		if (node < 0)
-			node = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(info->start_addr);
 
 		if (mhp_supports_memmap_on_memory(info->length))
 			mhp_flags |= MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY;
-		result = __add_memory(node, info->start_addr, info->length,
+		result = __add_memory(mgid, info->start_addr, info->length,
 				      mhp_flags);
 
 		/*
@@ -253,6 +273,10 @@ static void acpi_memory_device_free(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
 	if (!mem_device)
 		return;
 
+	/* In case we succeeded adding *some* memory, unregistering fails. */
+	if (mem_device->mgid >= 0)
+		unregister_memory_group(mem_device->mgid);
+
 	acpi_memory_free_device_resources(mem_device);
 	mem_device->device->driver_data = NULL;
 	kfree(mem_device);
@@ -273,6 +297,7 @@ static int acpi_memory_device_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mem_device->res_list);
 	mem_device->device = device;
+	mem_device->mgid = -1;
 	sprintf(acpi_device_name(device), "%s", ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_NAME);
 	sprintf(acpi_device_class(device), "%s", ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_CLASS);
 	device->driver_data = mem_device;
-- 
2.31.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-07 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-07 19:54 [PATCH v1 00/12] mm/memory_hotplug: "auto-movable" online policy and memory groups David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54 ` [PATCH v1 01/12] mm/memory_hotplug: use "unsigned long" for PFN in zone_for_pfn_range() David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54 ` [PATCH v1 02/12] mm: track present early pages per zone David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54 ` [PATCH v1 03/12] mm/memory_hotplug: introduce "auto-movable" online policy David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54 ` [PATCH v1 04/12] mm/memory_hotplug: remove nid parameter from arch_remove_memory() David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-08  8:32   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-08  8:32     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-08  8:32     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-08  8:32     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-08 10:50   ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-08 10:50     ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-08 10:50     ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-08 10:50     ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-09  5:51   ` Heiko Carstens
2021-06-09  5:51     ` Heiko Carstens
2021-06-09  5:51     ` Heiko Carstens
2021-06-07 19:54 ` [PATCH v1 05/12] mm/memory_hotplug: remove nid parameter from remove_memory() and friends David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-08 11:11   ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-08 11:11     ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-08 11:11     ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-08 11:18     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-08 11:18       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-08 11:18       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-09 10:05       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-09 10:05         ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-09 10:05         ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54 ` [PATCH v1 06/12] drivers/base/memory: "memory groups" to logically group memory blocks David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54 ` [PATCH v1 07/12] mm/memory_hotplug: track present pages in memory groups David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54 ` [PATCH v1 08/12] ACPI: memhotplug: memory resources cannot be enabled yet David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-08 12:20   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-08 12:20     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-08 12:20     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-07 19:54 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2021-06-07 19:54   ` [PATCH v1 09/12] ACPI: memhotplug: use a single static memory group for a single memory device David Hildenbrand
2021-06-08 12:20   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-08 12:20     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-08 12:20     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-07 19:54 ` [PATCH v1 10/12] virtio-mem: use a single dynamic memory group for a single virtio-mem device David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54 ` [PATCH v1 11/12] mm/memory_hotplug: memory group aware "auto-movable" online policy David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54 ` [PATCH v1 12/12] mm/memory_hotplug: improved dynamic " David Hildenbrand
2021-06-07 19:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-08  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 00/12] mm/memory_hotplug: "auto-movable" online policy and memory groups Oscar Salvador
2021-06-08 10:12   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-08 10:12     ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210607195430.48228-10-david@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkedzier@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=teawater@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.