From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/ttm: pass along the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 09:44:26 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210608084428.142676-5-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210608084428.142676-1-matthew.auld@intel.com> Currently we just ignore the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS flag, which is fine since everything is already contiguous with the ttm range manager. However in the next patch we want to switch over to the ttm buddy manager, where allocations are by default not contiguous. v2(Thomas): - Forward ALLOC_CONTIG for all regions Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c index 73d52df8f2be..c612275c36c9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c @@ -86,10 +86,14 @@ i915_ttm_select_tt_caching(const struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) static void i915_ttm_place_from_region(const struct intel_memory_region *mr, - struct ttm_place *place) + struct ttm_place *place, + unsigned int flags) { memset(place, 0, sizeof(*place)); place->mem_type = intel_region_to_ttm_type(mr); + + if (flags & I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS) + place->flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS; } static void @@ -100,15 +104,16 @@ i915_ttm_placement_from_obj(const struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, { unsigned int i; unsigned int num_allowed = obj->mm.n_placements; + unsigned int flags = obj->flags; placement->num_placement = 1; i915_ttm_place_from_region(num_allowed ? obj->mm.placements[0] : - obj->mm.region, requested); + obj->mm.region, requested, flags); /* Cache this on object? */ placement->num_busy_placement = num_allowed; for (i = 0; i < placement->num_busy_placement; ++i) - i915_ttm_place_from_region(obj->mm.placements[i], busy + i); + i915_ttm_place_from_region(obj->mm.placements[i], busy + i, flags); if (num_allowed == 0) { *busy = *requested; -- 2.26.3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/ttm: pass along the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 09:44:26 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210608084428.142676-5-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210608084428.142676-1-matthew.auld@intel.com> Currently we just ignore the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS flag, which is fine since everything is already contiguous with the ttm range manager. However in the next patch we want to switch over to the ttm buddy manager, where allocations are by default not contiguous. v2(Thomas): - Forward ALLOC_CONTIG for all regions Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c index 73d52df8f2be..c612275c36c9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c @@ -86,10 +86,14 @@ i915_ttm_select_tt_caching(const struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) static void i915_ttm_place_from_region(const struct intel_memory_region *mr, - struct ttm_place *place) + struct ttm_place *place, + unsigned int flags) { memset(place, 0, sizeof(*place)); place->mem_type = intel_region_to_ttm_type(mr); + + if (flags & I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS) + place->flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS; } static void @@ -100,15 +104,16 @@ i915_ttm_placement_from_obj(const struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, { unsigned int i; unsigned int num_allowed = obj->mm.n_placements; + unsigned int flags = obj->flags; placement->num_placement = 1; i915_ttm_place_from_region(num_allowed ? obj->mm.placements[0] : - obj->mm.region, requested); + obj->mm.region, requested, flags); /* Cache this on object? */ placement->num_busy_placement = num_allowed; for (i = 0; i < placement->num_busy_placement; ++i) - i915_ttm_place_from_region(obj->mm.placements[i], busy + i); + i915_ttm_place_from_region(obj->mm.placements[i], busy + i, flags); if (num_allowed == 0) { *busy = *requested; -- 2.26.3 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-08 8:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-08 8:44 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add back the buddy allocator Matthew Auld 2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld 2021-06-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915/ttm: add ttm_buddy_man Matthew Auld 2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld 2021-06-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915/ttm: add i915_sg_from_buddy_resource Matthew Auld 2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld 2021-06-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915/ttm: Calculate the object placement at get_pages time Matthew Auld 2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld 2021-06-08 8:44 ` Matthew Auld [this message] 2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/ttm: pass along the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS Matthew Auld 2021-06-08 9:48 ` Thomas Hellström 2021-06-08 9:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström 2021-06-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/ttm: switch over to ttm_buddy_man Matthew Auld 2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld 2021-06-08 9:53 ` Thomas Hellström 2021-06-08 9:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström 2021-06-08 10:08 ` Matthew Auld 2021-06-08 10:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld 2021-06-08 10:14 ` Thomas Hellström 2021-06-08 10:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström 2021-06-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915/ttm: restore min_page_size behaviour Matthew Auld 2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld 2021-06-08 9:49 ` Thomas Hellström 2021-06-08 9:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström 2021-06-08 9:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Add back the buddy allocator (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210608084428.142676-5-matthew.auld@intel.com \ --to=matthew.auld@intel.com \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.