All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>
To: <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	<aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<palmerdabbelt@google.com>, <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
	<wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, <sunnanyong@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 -next] riscv: mm: fix build errors caused by mk_pmd()
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 17:58:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210617095831.2398438-1-sunnanyong@huawei.com> (raw)

With "riscv: mm: add THP support on 64-bit", mk_pmd() function
introduce build errors,
1.build with CONFIG_ARCH_RV32I=y:
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h: In function 'mk_pmd':
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h:513:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'pfn_pmd';
 did you mean 'pfn_pgd'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2.build with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y && CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=n
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h: In function 'mk_pmd':
include/asm-generic/memory_model.h:64:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'page_to_section';
 did you mean 'present_section'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Move the definition of mk_pmd to pgtable-64.h to fix the first error.
Use macro definition instead of inline function for mk_pmd
to fix the second problem. It is similar to the mk_pte macro.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Move mk_pmd to pgtable-64.h
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h | 2 ++
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h    | 5 -----
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h
index 1439017b16f8..228261aa9628 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h
@@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ static inline unsigned long _pmd_pfn(pmd_t pmd)
 	return pmd_val(pmd) >> _PAGE_PFN_SHIFT;
 }
 
+#define mk_pmd(page, prot)    pfn_pmd(page_to_pfn(page), prot)
+
 #define pmd_ERROR(e) \
 	pr_err("%s:%d: bad pmd %016lx.\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, pmd_val(e))
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 5ae51e6bd5ab..6bc2582f82e9 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -516,11 +516,6 @@ static inline unsigned long pmd_pfn(pmd_t pmd)
 	return ((__pmd_to_phys(pmd) & PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 }
 
-static inline pmd_t mk_pmd(struct page *page, pgprot_t prot)
-{
-	return pfn_pmd(page_to_pfn(page), prot);
-}
-
 static inline pmd_t pmd_modify(pmd_t pmd, pgprot_t newprot)
 {
 	return pte_pmd(pte_modify(pmd_pte(pmd), newprot));
-- 
2.18.0.huawei.25


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>
To: <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	<aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<palmerdabbelt@google.com>, <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
	<wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, <sunnanyong@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 -next] riscv: mm: fix build errors caused by mk_pmd()
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 17:58:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210617095831.2398438-1-sunnanyong@huawei.com> (raw)

With "riscv: mm: add THP support on 64-bit", mk_pmd() function
introduce build errors,
1.build with CONFIG_ARCH_RV32I=y:
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h: In function 'mk_pmd':
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h:513:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'pfn_pmd';
 did you mean 'pfn_pgd'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2.build with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y && CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=n
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h: In function 'mk_pmd':
include/asm-generic/memory_model.h:64:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'page_to_section';
 did you mean 'present_section'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Move the definition of mk_pmd to pgtable-64.h to fix the first error.
Use macro definition instead of inline function for mk_pmd
to fix the second problem. It is similar to the mk_pte macro.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Move mk_pmd to pgtable-64.h
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h | 2 ++
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h    | 5 -----
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h
index 1439017b16f8..228261aa9628 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h
@@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ static inline unsigned long _pmd_pfn(pmd_t pmd)
 	return pmd_val(pmd) >> _PAGE_PFN_SHIFT;
 }
 
+#define mk_pmd(page, prot)    pfn_pmd(page_to_pfn(page), prot)
+
 #define pmd_ERROR(e) \
 	pr_err("%s:%d: bad pmd %016lx.\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, pmd_val(e))
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 5ae51e6bd5ab..6bc2582f82e9 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -516,11 +516,6 @@ static inline unsigned long pmd_pfn(pmd_t pmd)
 	return ((__pmd_to_phys(pmd) & PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 }
 
-static inline pmd_t mk_pmd(struct page *page, pgprot_t prot)
-{
-	return pfn_pmd(page_to_pfn(page), prot);
-}
-
 static inline pmd_t pmd_modify(pmd_t pmd, pgprot_t newprot)
 {
 	return pte_pmd(pte_modify(pmd_pte(pmd), newprot));
-- 
2.18.0.huawei.25


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

             reply	other threads:[~2021-06-17  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-17  9:58 Nanyong Sun [this message]
2021-06-17  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 -next] riscv: mm: fix build errors caused by mk_pmd() Nanyong Sun
2021-06-22 14:03 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-06-22 14:03   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-07-06  2:50 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-07-06  2:50   ` Palmer Dabbelt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210617095831.2398438-1-sunnanyong@huawei.com \
    --to=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=palmerdabbelt@google.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.