All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	virtio-fs@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] virtiofsd: Don't allow file creation with FUSE_OPEN
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:15:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210617141518.304659-1-groug@kaod.org> (raw)

A well behaved FUSE client uses FUSE_CREATE to create files. It isn't
supposed to pass O_CREAT along a FUSE_OPEN request, as documented in
the "fuse_lowlevel.h" header :

    /**
     * Open a file
     *
     * Open flags are available in fi->flags. The following rules
     * apply.
     *
     *  - Creation (O_CREAT, O_EXCL, O_NOCTTY) flags will be
     *    filtered out / handled by the kernel.

But if it does anyway, virtiofsd crashes with:

*** invalid openat64 call: O_CREAT or O_TMPFILE without mode ***: terminated

This is because virtiofsd ends up passing this flag to openat() without
passing a mode_t 4th argument which is mandatory with O_CREAT, and glibc
aborts.

The offending path is:

lo_open()
    lo_do_open()
        lo_inode_open()

Other callers of lo_inode_open() only pass O_RDWR and lo_create()
passes a valid fd to lo_do_open() which thus doesn't even call
lo_inode_open() in this case.

Specifying O_CREAT with FUSE_OPEN is a protocol violation. Check this
in lo_open() and return an error to the client : EINVAL since this is
already what glibc returns with other illegal flag combinations.

The FUSE filesystem doesn't currently support O_TMPFILE, but the very
same would happen if O_TMPFILE was passed in a FUSE_OPEN request. Check
that as well.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
---
 tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
index 49c21fd85570..14f62133131c 100644
--- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
+++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
@@ -2145,6 +2145,12 @@ static void lo_open(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, struct fuse_file_info *fi)
         return;
     }
 
+    /* File creation is handled by lo_create() */
+    if (fi->flags & (O_CREAT | O_TMPFILE)) {
+        fuse_reply_err(req, EINVAL);
+        return;
+    }
+
     err = lo_do_open(lo, inode, -1, fi);
     lo_inode_put(lo, &inode);
     if (err) {
-- 
2.31.1



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	virtio-fs@redhat.com, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH] virtiofsd: Don't allow file creation with FUSE_OPEN
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:15:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210617141518.304659-1-groug@kaod.org> (raw)

A well behaved FUSE client uses FUSE_CREATE to create files. It isn't
supposed to pass O_CREAT along a FUSE_OPEN request, as documented in
the "fuse_lowlevel.h" header :

    /**
     * Open a file
     *
     * Open flags are available in fi->flags. The following rules
     * apply.
     *
     *  - Creation (O_CREAT, O_EXCL, O_NOCTTY) flags will be
     *    filtered out / handled by the kernel.

But if it does anyway, virtiofsd crashes with:

*** invalid openat64 call: O_CREAT or O_TMPFILE without mode ***: terminated

This is because virtiofsd ends up passing this flag to openat() without
passing a mode_t 4th argument which is mandatory with O_CREAT, and glibc
aborts.

The offending path is:

lo_open()
    lo_do_open()
        lo_inode_open()

Other callers of lo_inode_open() only pass O_RDWR and lo_create()
passes a valid fd to lo_do_open() which thus doesn't even call
lo_inode_open() in this case.

Specifying O_CREAT with FUSE_OPEN is a protocol violation. Check this
in lo_open() and return an error to the client : EINVAL since this is
already what glibc returns with other illegal flag combinations.

The FUSE filesystem doesn't currently support O_TMPFILE, but the very
same would happen if O_TMPFILE was passed in a FUSE_OPEN request. Check
that as well.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
---
 tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
index 49c21fd85570..14f62133131c 100644
--- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
+++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
@@ -2145,6 +2145,12 @@ static void lo_open(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, struct fuse_file_info *fi)
         return;
     }
 
+    /* File creation is handled by lo_create() */
+    if (fi->flags & (O_CREAT | O_TMPFILE)) {
+        fuse_reply_err(req, EINVAL);
+        return;
+    }
+
     err = lo_do_open(lo, inode, -1, fi);
     lo_inode_put(lo, &inode);
     if (err) {
-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-06-17 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-17 14:15 Greg Kurz [this message]
2021-06-17 14:15 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH] virtiofsd: Don't allow file creation with FUSE_OPEN Greg Kurz
2021-06-17 14:29 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-06-17 14:29   ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-06-17 16:18   ` Greg Kurz
2021-06-17 16:18     ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz
2021-06-18  1:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-06-18  1:40   ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-06-18  8:20   ` Greg Kurz
2021-06-18  8:20     ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz
2021-06-18  8:58 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-18  8:58   ` [Virtio-fs] " Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-18  9:21   ` Greg Kurz
2021-06-18  9:21     ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz
2021-06-18  9:34     ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-18  9:34       ` [Virtio-fs] " Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-21 13:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-06-21 13:36   ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-06-22 16:01   ` Greg Kurz
2021-06-22 16:01     ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210617141518.304659-1-groug@kaod.org \
    --to=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.