From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com,
boqun.feng@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
joro@8bytes.org, bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
bigeasy@linutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] lockdep: Fix wait-type for empty stack
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 20:57:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210617190313.256987481@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20210617185717.486456641@infradead.org
Even the very first lock can violate the wait-context check, consider
the various IRQ contexts.
Fixes: de8f5e4f2dc1 ("lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -4577,7 +4577,7 @@ static int check_wait_context(struct tas
u8 curr_inner;
int depth;
- if (!curr->lockdep_depth || !next_inner || next->trylock)
+ if (!next_inner || next->trylock)
return 0;
if (!next_outer)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-17 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-17 18:57 [PATCH 0/3] lockdep: PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING=y fixes Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-17 18:57 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-06-23 8:19 ` [tip: locking/core] lockdep: Fix wait-type for empty stack tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] lockdep/selftests: Fix selftests vs PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-23 8:19 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] lockdep/selftest: Remove wait-type RCU_CALLBACK tests Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-23 8:19 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-18 9:23 ` [PATCH 0/3] lockdep: PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING=y fixes Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210617190313.256987481@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.