From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com Subject: [PATCH v3 3/8] include: trace: Add new scmi_xfer_response_wait event Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:26:20 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210712162626.34705-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210712162626.34705-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> Having a new step to trace SCMI stack while it waits for synchronous responses is useful to analyze system performance when changing waiting mode between polling and interrupt completion. Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> --- include/trace/events/scmi.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/trace/events/scmi.h b/include/trace/events/scmi.h index f3a4b4d60714..ba82082f30d7 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/scmi.h +++ b/include/trace/events/scmi.h @@ -33,6 +33,34 @@ TRACE_EVENT(scmi_xfer_begin, __entry->seq, __entry->poll) ); +TRACE_EVENT(scmi_xfer_response_wait, + TP_PROTO(int transfer_id, u8 msg_id, u8 protocol_id, u16 seq, + bool poll, bool atomic), + TP_ARGS(transfer_id, msg_id, protocol_id, seq, poll, atomic), + + TP_STRUCT__entry( + __field(int, transfer_id) + __field(u8, msg_id) + __field(u8, protocol_id) + __field(u16, seq) + __field(bool, poll) + __field(bool, atomic) + ), + + TP_fast_assign( + __entry->transfer_id = transfer_id; + __entry->msg_id = msg_id; + __entry->protocol_id = protocol_id; + __entry->seq = seq; + __entry->poll = poll; + __entry->atomic = atomic; + ), + + TP_printk("transfer_id=%d msg_id=%u protocol_id=%u seq=%u poll=%u atomic=%u", + __entry->transfer_id, __entry->msg_id, __entry->protocol_id, + __entry->seq, __entry->poll, __entry->atomic) +); + TRACE_EVENT(scmi_xfer_end, TP_PROTO(int transfer_id, u8 msg_id, u8 protocol_id, u16 seq, int status), -- 2.17.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com Subject: [PATCH v3 3/8] include: trace: Add new scmi_xfer_response_wait event Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:26:20 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210712162626.34705-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210712162626.34705-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> Having a new step to trace SCMI stack while it waits for synchronous responses is useful to analyze system performance when changing waiting mode between polling and interrupt completion. Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> --- include/trace/events/scmi.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/trace/events/scmi.h b/include/trace/events/scmi.h index f3a4b4d60714..ba82082f30d7 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/scmi.h +++ b/include/trace/events/scmi.h @@ -33,6 +33,34 @@ TRACE_EVENT(scmi_xfer_begin, __entry->seq, __entry->poll) ); +TRACE_EVENT(scmi_xfer_response_wait, + TP_PROTO(int transfer_id, u8 msg_id, u8 protocol_id, u16 seq, + bool poll, bool atomic), + TP_ARGS(transfer_id, msg_id, protocol_id, seq, poll, atomic), + + TP_STRUCT__entry( + __field(int, transfer_id) + __field(u8, msg_id) + __field(u8, protocol_id) + __field(u16, seq) + __field(bool, poll) + __field(bool, atomic) + ), + + TP_fast_assign( + __entry->transfer_id = transfer_id; + __entry->msg_id = msg_id; + __entry->protocol_id = protocol_id; + __entry->seq = seq; + __entry->poll = poll; + __entry->atomic = atomic; + ), + + TP_printk("transfer_id=%d msg_id=%u protocol_id=%u seq=%u poll=%u atomic=%u", + __entry->transfer_id, __entry->msg_id, __entry->protocol_id, + __entry->seq, __entry->poll, __entry->atomic) +); + TRACE_EVENT(scmi_xfer_end, TP_PROTO(int transfer_id, u8 msg_id, u8 protocol_id, u16 seq, int status), -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-12 16:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-07-12 16:26 [PATCH v3 0/8] Introduce atomic support for SCMI transports Cristian Marussi 2021-07-12 16:26 ` Cristian Marussi 2021-07-12 16:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] firmware: arm_scmi: Add configurable polling mode for transports Cristian Marussi 2021-07-12 16:26 ` Cristian Marussi 2021-07-12 16:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for atomic transports Cristian Marussi 2021-07-12 16:26 ` Cristian Marussi 2021-07-12 16:26 ` Cristian Marussi [this message] 2021-07-12 16:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] include: trace: Add new scmi_xfer_response_wait event Cristian Marussi 2021-07-12 16:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] firmware: arm_scmi: Use new trace event scmi_xfer_response_wait Cristian Marussi 2021-07-12 16:26 ` Cristian Marussi 2021-07-12 16:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] firmware: arm_scmi: Add is_transport_atomic() handle method Cristian Marussi 2021-07-12 16:26 ` Cristian Marussi 2021-07-12 16:26 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] clk: scmi: Support atomic enable/disable API Cristian Marussi 2021-07-12 16:26 ` Cristian Marussi 2021-07-12 16:26 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] [RFC] firmware: arm_scmi: Make smc transport use common completions Cristian Marussi 2021-07-12 16:26 ` Cristian Marussi 2021-07-12 16:26 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] [RFC] firmware: arm_scmi: Make smc transport atomic Cristian Marussi 2021-07-12 16:26 ` Cristian Marussi 2021-07-15 16:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] Introduce atomic support for SCMI transports Peter Hilber 2021-07-15 16:36 ` Peter Hilber
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210712162626.34705-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com \ --to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \ --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \ --cc=etienne.carriere@linaro.org \ --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \ --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=souvik.chakravarty@arm.com \ --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \ --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.