All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] vmalloc: Choose a better start address in vm_area_register_early()
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:51:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210720025105.103680-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210720025105.103680-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>

There are some fixed locations in the vmalloc area be reserved
in ARM(see iotable_init()) and ARM64(see map_kernel()), but for
pcpu_page_first_chunk(), it calls vm_area_register_early() and
choose VMALLOC_START as the start address of vmap area which
could be conflicted with above address, then could trigger a
BUG_ON in vm_area_add_early().

Let's choose the end of existing address range in vmlist as the
start address instead of VMALLOC_START to avoid the BUG_ON.

Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index d5cd52805149..a98cf97f032f 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2238,12 +2238,14 @@ void __init vm_area_add_early(struct vm_struct *vm)
  */
 void __init vm_area_register_early(struct vm_struct *vm, size_t align)
 {
-	static size_t vm_init_off __initdata;
+	unsigned long vm_start = VMALLOC_START;
+	struct vm_struct *tmp;
 	unsigned long addr;
 
-	addr = ALIGN(VMALLOC_START + vm_init_off, align);
-	vm_init_off = PFN_ALIGN(addr + vm->size) - VMALLOC_START;
+	for (tmp = vmlist; tmp; tmp = tmp->next)
+		vm_start = (unsigned long)tmp->addr + tmp->size;
 
+	addr = ALIGN(vm_start, align);
 	vm->addr = (void *)addr;
 
 	vm_area_add_early(vm);
-- 
2.26.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	 Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] vmalloc: Choose a better start address in vm_area_register_early()
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:51:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210720025105.103680-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210720025105.103680-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>

There are some fixed locations in the vmalloc area be reserved
in ARM(see iotable_init()) and ARM64(see map_kernel()), but for
pcpu_page_first_chunk(), it calls vm_area_register_early() and
choose VMALLOC_START as the start address of vmap area which
could be conflicted with above address, then could trigger a
BUG_ON in vm_area_add_early().

Let's choose the end of existing address range in vmlist as the
start address instead of VMALLOC_START to avoid the BUG_ON.

Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index d5cd52805149..a98cf97f032f 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2238,12 +2238,14 @@ void __init vm_area_add_early(struct vm_struct *vm)
  */
 void __init vm_area_register_early(struct vm_struct *vm, size_t align)
 {
-	static size_t vm_init_off __initdata;
+	unsigned long vm_start = VMALLOC_START;
+	struct vm_struct *tmp;
 	unsigned long addr;
 
-	addr = ALIGN(VMALLOC_START + vm_init_off, align);
-	vm_init_off = PFN_ALIGN(addr + vm->size) - VMALLOC_START;
+	for (tmp = vmlist; tmp; tmp = tmp->next)
+		vm_start = (unsigned long)tmp->addr + tmp->size;
 
+	addr = ALIGN(vm_start, align);
 	vm->addr = (void *)addr;
 
 	vm_area_add_early(vm);
-- 
2.26.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-20  2:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-20  2:51 [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: support page mapping percpu first chunk allocator Kefeng Wang
2021-07-20  2:51 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-07-20  2:51 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2021-07-20  2:51   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] vmalloc: Choose a better start address in vm_area_register_early() Kefeng Wang
2021-08-01 15:23   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-08-01 15:23     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-08-02  2:39     ` Kefeng Wang
2021-08-02  2:39       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-08-04 11:14       ` Catalin Marinas
2021-08-04 11:14         ` Catalin Marinas
2021-08-05 12:46         ` Kefeng Wang
2021-08-05 12:46           ` Kefeng Wang
2021-07-20  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: Support page mapping percpu first chunk allocator Kefeng Wang
2021-07-20  2:51   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-08-01 15:53   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-08-01 15:53     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-08-02  2:47     ` Kefeng Wang
2021-08-02  2:47       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-07-20  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] kasan: arm64: Fix pcpu_page_first_chunk crash with KASAN_VMALLOC Kefeng Wang
2021-07-20  2:51   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-07-22 11:00   ` Marco Elver
2021-07-22 11:00     ` Marco Elver
2021-07-22 12:14     ` Kefeng Wang
2021-07-22 12:14       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-07-26  1:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: support page mapping percpu first chunk allocator Kefeng Wang
2021-07-26  1:19   ` Kefeng Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210720025105.103680-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.