All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-gpio <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] pinctrl: single: Move test PCS_HAS_PINCONF in pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry() to the beginning
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 11:39:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210722033930.4034-3-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210722033930.4034-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>

The value of pcs->flags is not overwritten in function
pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry() and its subfunctions, so moving this
check to the beginning of the function eliminates unnecessary rollback
operations.

Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
index 4fcae8458359..d8b4dc40f3c6 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ static int pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
 {
 	const char *name = "pinctrl-single,bits";
 	struct pcs_func_vals *vals;
-	int rows, *pins, found = 0, res = -ENOMEM, i, fsel, gsel;
+	int rows, *pins, found = 0, res = -ENOMEM, i, fsel;
 	int npins_in_row;
 	struct pcs_function *function = NULL;
 
@@ -1125,6 +1125,11 @@ static int pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	if (PCS_HAS_PINCONF) {
+		dev_err(pcs->dev, "pinconf not supported\n");
+		return -ENOTSUPP;
+	}
+
 	npins_in_row = pcs->width / pcs->bits_per_pin;
 
 	vals = devm_kzalloc(pcs->dev,
@@ -1212,30 +1217,19 @@ static int pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
 		goto free_pins;
 	}
 
-	gsel = pinctrl_generic_add_group(pcs->pctl, np->name, pins, found, pcs);
-	if (gsel < 0) {
-		res = gsel;
+	res = pinctrl_generic_add_group(pcs->pctl, np->name, pins, found, pcs);
+	if (res < 0)
 		goto free_function;
-	}
 
 	(*map)->type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP;
 	(*map)->data.mux.group = np->name;
 	(*map)->data.mux.function = np->name;
 
-	if (PCS_HAS_PINCONF) {
-		dev_err(pcs->dev, "pinconf not supported\n");
-		res = -ENOTSUPP;
-		goto free_pingroups;
-	}
-
 	*num_maps = 1;
 	mutex_unlock(&pcs->mutex);
 
 	return 0;
 
-free_pingroups:
-	pinctrl_generic_remove_group(pcs->pctl, gsel);
-	*num_maps = 1;
 free_function:
 	pinmux_generic_remove_function(pcs->pctl, fsel);
 free_pins:
-- 
2.25.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-gpio <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] pinctrl: single: Move test PCS_HAS_PINCONF in pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry() to the beginning
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 11:39:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210722033930.4034-3-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210722033930.4034-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>

The value of pcs->flags is not overwritten in function
pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry() and its subfunctions, so moving this
check to the beginning of the function eliminates unnecessary rollback
operations.

Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
index 4fcae8458359..d8b4dc40f3c6 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ static int pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
 {
 	const char *name = "pinctrl-single,bits";
 	struct pcs_func_vals *vals;
-	int rows, *pins, found = 0, res = -ENOMEM, i, fsel, gsel;
+	int rows, *pins, found = 0, res = -ENOMEM, i, fsel;
 	int npins_in_row;
 	struct pcs_function *function = NULL;
 
@@ -1125,6 +1125,11 @@ static int pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	if (PCS_HAS_PINCONF) {
+		dev_err(pcs->dev, "pinconf not supported\n");
+		return -ENOTSUPP;
+	}
+
 	npins_in_row = pcs->width / pcs->bits_per_pin;
 
 	vals = devm_kzalloc(pcs->dev,
@@ -1212,30 +1217,19 @@ static int pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
 		goto free_pins;
 	}
 
-	gsel = pinctrl_generic_add_group(pcs->pctl, np->name, pins, found, pcs);
-	if (gsel < 0) {
-		res = gsel;
+	res = pinctrl_generic_add_group(pcs->pctl, np->name, pins, found, pcs);
+	if (res < 0)
 		goto free_function;
-	}
 
 	(*map)->type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP;
 	(*map)->data.mux.group = np->name;
 	(*map)->data.mux.function = np->name;
 
-	if (PCS_HAS_PINCONF) {
-		dev_err(pcs->dev, "pinconf not supported\n");
-		res = -ENOTSUPP;
-		goto free_pingroups;
-	}
-
 	*num_maps = 1;
 	mutex_unlock(&pcs->mutex);
 
 	return 0;
 
-free_pingroups:
-	pinctrl_generic_remove_group(pcs->pctl, gsel);
-	*num_maps = 1;
 free_function:
 	pinmux_generic_remove_function(pcs->pctl, fsel);
 free_pins:
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-22  3:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-22  3:39 [PATCH v2 0/2] pinctrl: single: Move test PCS_HAS_PINCONF in pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry() to the beginning and fix its return value Zhen Lei
2021-07-22  3:39 ` Zhen Lei
2021-07-22  3:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] pinctrl: single: Fix error return code in pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry() Zhen Lei
2021-07-22  3:39   ` Zhen Lei
2021-07-22  3:39 ` Zhen Lei [this message]
2021-07-22  3:39   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] pinctrl: single: Move test PCS_HAS_PINCONF in pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry() to the beginning Zhen Lei
2021-07-27  9:56   ` Tony Lindgren
2021-07-27  9:56     ` Tony Lindgren
2021-08-10 12:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] pinctrl: single: Move test PCS_HAS_PINCONF in pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry() to the beginning and fix its return value Linus Walleij
2021-08-10 12:43   ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210722033930.4034-3-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --to=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.