All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Gianluca Falavigna <gianluca.falavigna@inwind.it>,
	Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
	Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>,
	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
	linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] can: c_can: support tx ring algorithm
Date: Sat,  7 Aug 2021 15:07:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210807130800.5246-4-dariobin@libero.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210807130800.5246-1-dariobin@libero.it>

The algorithm is already used successfully by other CAN drivers
(e.g. mcp251xfd). Its implementation was kindly suggested to me by
Marc Kleine-Budde following a patch I had previously submitted. You can
find every detail at https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1422929/.

The idea is that after this patch, it will be easier to patch the driver
to use the message object memory as a true FIFO.

Suggested-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>

---

(no changes since v2)

Changes in v2:
- Move c_can_get_tx_free() from c_can_main.c to c_can.h.

 drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h      | 33 ++++++++++++++-
 drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
index 8f23e9c83c84..9b4e54c950a6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
@@ -176,6 +176,13 @@ struct c_can_raminit {
 	bool needs_pulse;
 };
 
+/* c_can tx ring structure */
+struct c_can_tx_ring {
+	unsigned int head;
+	unsigned int tail;
+	unsigned int obj_num;
+};
+
 /* c_can private data structure */
 struct c_can_priv {
 	struct can_priv can;	/* must be the first member */
@@ -190,10 +197,10 @@ struct c_can_priv {
 	unsigned int msg_obj_tx_first;
 	unsigned int msg_obj_tx_last;
 	u32 msg_obj_rx_mask;
-	atomic_t tx_active;
 	atomic_t sie_pending;
 	unsigned long tx_dir;
 	int last_status;
+	struct c_can_tx_ring tx;
 	u16 (*read_reg)(const struct c_can_priv *priv, enum reg index);
 	void (*write_reg)(const struct c_can_priv *priv, enum reg index, u16 val);
 	u32 (*read_reg32)(const struct c_can_priv *priv, enum reg index);
@@ -219,4 +226,28 @@ int c_can_power_down(struct net_device *dev);
 
 void c_can_set_ethtool_ops(struct net_device *dev);
 
+static inline u8 c_can_get_tx_head(const struct c_can_tx_ring *ring)
+{
+	return ring->head & (ring->obj_num - 1);
+}
+
+static inline u8 c_can_get_tx_tail(const struct c_can_tx_ring *ring)
+{
+	return ring->tail & (ring->obj_num - 1);
+}
+
+static inline u8 c_can_get_tx_free(const struct c_can_tx_ring *ring)
+{
+	u8 head = c_can_get_tx_head(ring);
+	u8 tail = c_can_get_tx_tail(ring);
+
+	/* This is not a FIFO. C/D_CAN sends out the buffers
+	 * prioritized. The lowest buffer number wins.
+	 */
+	if (head < tail)
+		return 0;
+
+	return ring->obj_num - head;
+}
+
 #endif /* C_CAN_H */
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c
index fec0e3416970..80a6196a8d7a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c
@@ -427,24 +427,50 @@ static void c_can_setup_receive_object(struct net_device *dev, int iface,
 	c_can_object_put(dev, iface, obj, IF_COMM_RCV_SETUP);
 }
 
+static bool c_can_tx_busy(const struct c_can_priv *priv,
+			  const struct c_can_tx_ring *tx_ring)
+{
+	if (c_can_get_tx_free(tx_ring) > 0)
+		return false;
+
+	netif_stop_queue(priv->dev);
+
+	/* Memory barrier before checking tx_free (head and tail) */
+	smp_mb();
+
+	if (c_can_get_tx_free(tx_ring) == 0) {
+		netdev_dbg(priv->dev,
+			   "Stopping tx-queue (tx_head=0x%08x, tx_tail=0x%08x, len=%d).\n",
+			   tx_ring->head, tx_ring->tail,
+			   tx_ring->head - tx_ring->tail);
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	netif_start_queue(priv->dev);
+	return false;
+}
+
 static netdev_tx_t c_can_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 				    struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	struct can_frame *frame = (struct can_frame *)skb->data;
 	struct c_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
+	struct c_can_tx_ring *tx_ring = &priv->tx;
 	u32 idx, obj;
 
 	if (can_dropped_invalid_skb(dev, skb))
 		return NETDEV_TX_OK;
-	/* This is not a FIFO. C/D_CAN sends out the buffers
-	 * prioritized. The lowest buffer number wins.
-	 */
-	idx = fls(atomic_read(&priv->tx_active));
-	obj = idx + priv->msg_obj_tx_first;
 
-	/* If this is the last buffer, stop the xmit queue */
-	if (idx == priv->msg_obj_tx_num - 1)
+	if (c_can_tx_busy(priv, tx_ring))
+		return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
+
+	idx = c_can_get_tx_head(tx_ring);
+	tx_ring->head++;
+	if (c_can_get_tx_free(tx_ring) == 0)
 		netif_stop_queue(dev);
+
+	obj = idx + priv->msg_obj_tx_first;
+
 	/* Store the message in the interface so we can call
 	 * can_put_echo_skb(). We must do this before we enable
 	 * transmit as we might race against do_tx().
@@ -453,8 +479,6 @@ static netdev_tx_t c_can_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	priv->dlc[idx] = frame->len;
 	can_put_echo_skb(skb, dev, idx, 0);
 
-	/* Update the active bits */
-	atomic_add(BIT(idx), &priv->tx_active);
 	/* Start transmission */
 	c_can_object_put(dev, IF_TX, obj, IF_COMM_TX);
 
@@ -567,6 +591,7 @@ static int c_can_software_reset(struct net_device *dev)
 static int c_can_chip_config(struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	struct c_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
+	struct c_can_tx_ring *tx_ring = &priv->tx;
 	int err;
 
 	err = c_can_software_reset(dev);
@@ -598,7 +623,8 @@ static int c_can_chip_config(struct net_device *dev)
 	priv->write_reg(priv, C_CAN_STS_REG, LEC_UNUSED);
 
 	/* Clear all internal status */
-	atomic_set(&priv->tx_active, 0);
+	tx_ring->head = 0;
+	tx_ring->tail = 0;
 	priv->tx_dir = 0;
 
 	/* set bittiming params */
@@ -696,14 +722,14 @@ static int c_can_get_berr_counter(const struct net_device *dev,
 static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	struct c_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
+	struct c_can_tx_ring *tx_ring = &priv->tx;
 	struct net_device_stats *stats = &dev->stats;
-	u32 idx, obj, pkts = 0, bytes = 0, pend, clr;
+	u32 idx, obj, pkts = 0, bytes = 0, pend;
 
 	if (priv->msg_obj_tx_last > 32)
 		pend = priv->read_reg32(priv, C_CAN_INTPND3_REG);
 	else
 		pend = priv->read_reg(priv, C_CAN_INTPND2_REG);
-	clr = pend;
 
 	while ((idx = ffs(pend))) {
 		idx--;
@@ -723,11 +749,14 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
 	if (!pkts)
 		return;
 
-	/* Clear the bits in the tx_active mask */
-	atomic_sub(clr, &priv->tx_active);
-
-	if (clr & BIT(priv->msg_obj_tx_num - 1))
-		netif_wake_queue(dev);
+	tx_ring->tail += pkts;
+	if (c_can_get_tx_free(tx_ring)) {
+		/* Make sure that anybody stopping the queue after
+		 * this sees the new tx_ring->tail.
+		 */
+		smp_mb();
+		netif_wake_queue(priv->dev);
+	}
 
 	stats->tx_bytes += bytes;
 	stats->tx_packets += pkts;
@@ -1206,6 +1235,10 @@ struct net_device *alloc_c_can_dev(int msg_obj_num)
 	priv->msg_obj_tx_last =
 		priv->msg_obj_tx_first + priv->msg_obj_tx_num - 1;
 
+	priv->tx.head = 0;
+	priv->tx.tail = 0;
+	priv->tx.obj_num = msg_obj_tx_num;
+
 	netif_napi_add(dev, &priv->napi, c_can_poll, priv->msg_obj_rx_num);
 
 	priv->dev = dev;
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-07 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-07 13:07 [PATCH v3 0/4] can: c_can: cache frames to operate as a true FIFO Dario Binacchi
2021-08-07 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] can: c_can: remove struct c_can_priv::priv field Dario Binacchi
2021-08-07 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] can: c_can: exit c_can_do_tx() early if no frames have been sent Dario Binacchi
2021-08-07 13:07 ` Dario Binacchi [this message]
2021-08-07 13:08 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] can: c_can: cache frames to operate as a true FIFO Dario Binacchi
2021-08-09  7:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] " Marc Kleine-Budde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210807130800.5246-4-dariobin@libero.it \
    --to=dariobin@libero.it \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gianluca.falavigna@inwind.it \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
    --cc=wg@grandegger.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.