All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/6] KVM: x86: Fix potential race in KVM_GET_CLOCK
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:11:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210816001130.3059564-2-oupton@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210816001130.3059564-1-oupton@google.com>

Sean noticed that KVM_GET_CLOCK was checking kvm_arch.use_master_clock
outside of the pvclock sync lock. This is problematic, as the clock
value written to the user may or may not actually correspond to a stable
TSC.

Fix the race by populating the entire kvm_clock_data structure behind
the pvclock_gtod_sync_lock.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index fdc0c18339fb..2f3929bd5f58 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -2787,19 +2787,20 @@ static void kvm_update_masterclock(struct kvm *kvm)
 	kvm_end_pvclock_update(kvm);
 }
 
-u64 get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm *kvm)
+static void get_kvmclock(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_clock_data *data)
 {
 	struct kvm_arch *ka = &kvm->arch;
 	struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info hv_clock;
 	unsigned long flags;
-	u64 ret;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock, flags);
 	if (!ka->use_master_clock) {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock, flags);
-		return get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
+		data->clock = get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
+		return;
 	}
 
+	data->flags |= KVM_CLOCK_TSC_STABLE;
 	hv_clock.tsc_timestamp = ka->master_cycle_now;
 	hv_clock.system_time = ka->master_kernel_ns + ka->kvmclock_offset;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock, flags);
@@ -2811,13 +2812,26 @@ u64 get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm *kvm)
 		kvm_get_time_scale(NSEC_PER_SEC, __this_cpu_read(cpu_tsc_khz) * 1000LL,
 				   &hv_clock.tsc_shift,
 				   &hv_clock.tsc_to_system_mul);
-		ret = __pvclock_read_cycles(&hv_clock, rdtsc());
-	} else
-		ret = get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
+		data->clock = __pvclock_read_cycles(&hv_clock, rdtsc());
+	} else {
+		data->clock = get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
+	}
 
 	put_cpu();
+}
 
-	return ret;
+u64 get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	struct kvm_clock_data data;
+
+	/*
+	 * Zero flags as it's accessed RMW, leave everything else uninitialized
+	 * as clock is always written and no other fields are consumed.
+	 */
+	data.flags = 0;
+
+	get_kvmclock(kvm, &data);
+	return data.clock;
 }
 
 static void kvm_setup_pvclock_page(struct kvm_vcpu *v,
@@ -6098,11 +6112,14 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
 	}
 	case KVM_GET_CLOCK: {
 		struct kvm_clock_data user_ns;
-		u64 now_ns;
 
-		now_ns = get_kvmclock_ns(kvm);
-		user_ns.clock = now_ns;
-		user_ns.flags = kvm->arch.use_master_clock ? KVM_CLOCK_TSC_STABLE : 0;
+		/*
+		 * Zero flags as it is accessed RMW, leave everything else
+		 * uninitialized as clock is always written and no other fields
+		 * are consumed.
+		 */
+		user_ns.flags = 0;
+		get_kvmclock(kvm, &user_ns);
 		memset(&user_ns.pad, 0, sizeof(user_ns.pad));
 
 		r = -EFAULT;
-- 
2.33.0.rc1.237.g0d66db33f3-goog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/6] KVM: x86: Fix potential race in KVM_GET_CLOCK
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:11:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210816001130.3059564-2-oupton@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210816001130.3059564-1-oupton@google.com>

Sean noticed that KVM_GET_CLOCK was checking kvm_arch.use_master_clock
outside of the pvclock sync lock. This is problematic, as the clock
value written to the user may or may not actually correspond to a stable
TSC.

Fix the race by populating the entire kvm_clock_data structure behind
the pvclock_gtod_sync_lock.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index fdc0c18339fb..2f3929bd5f58 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -2787,19 +2787,20 @@ static void kvm_update_masterclock(struct kvm *kvm)
 	kvm_end_pvclock_update(kvm);
 }
 
-u64 get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm *kvm)
+static void get_kvmclock(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_clock_data *data)
 {
 	struct kvm_arch *ka = &kvm->arch;
 	struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info hv_clock;
 	unsigned long flags;
-	u64 ret;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock, flags);
 	if (!ka->use_master_clock) {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock, flags);
-		return get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
+		data->clock = get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
+		return;
 	}
 
+	data->flags |= KVM_CLOCK_TSC_STABLE;
 	hv_clock.tsc_timestamp = ka->master_cycle_now;
 	hv_clock.system_time = ka->master_kernel_ns + ka->kvmclock_offset;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock, flags);
@@ -2811,13 +2812,26 @@ u64 get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm *kvm)
 		kvm_get_time_scale(NSEC_PER_SEC, __this_cpu_read(cpu_tsc_khz) * 1000LL,
 				   &hv_clock.tsc_shift,
 				   &hv_clock.tsc_to_system_mul);
-		ret = __pvclock_read_cycles(&hv_clock, rdtsc());
-	} else
-		ret = get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
+		data->clock = __pvclock_read_cycles(&hv_clock, rdtsc());
+	} else {
+		data->clock = get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
+	}
 
 	put_cpu();
+}
 
-	return ret;
+u64 get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	struct kvm_clock_data data;
+
+	/*
+	 * Zero flags as it's accessed RMW, leave everything else uninitialized
+	 * as clock is always written and no other fields are consumed.
+	 */
+	data.flags = 0;
+
+	get_kvmclock(kvm, &data);
+	return data.clock;
 }
 
 static void kvm_setup_pvclock_page(struct kvm_vcpu *v,
@@ -6098,11 +6112,14 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
 	}
 	case KVM_GET_CLOCK: {
 		struct kvm_clock_data user_ns;
-		u64 now_ns;
 
-		now_ns = get_kvmclock_ns(kvm);
-		user_ns.clock = now_ns;
-		user_ns.flags = kvm->arch.use_master_clock ? KVM_CLOCK_TSC_STABLE : 0;
+		/*
+		 * Zero flags as it is accessed RMW, leave everything else
+		 * uninitialized as clock is always written and no other fields
+		 * are consumed.
+		 */
+		user_ns.flags = 0;
+		get_kvmclock(kvm, &user_ns);
 		memset(&user_ns.pad, 0, sizeof(user_ns.pad));
 
 		r = -EFAULT;
-- 
2.33.0.rc1.237.g0d66db33f3-goog

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	 Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	 David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	 Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/6] KVM: x86: Fix potential race in KVM_GET_CLOCK
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:11:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210816001130.3059564-2-oupton@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210816001130.3059564-1-oupton@google.com>

Sean noticed that KVM_GET_CLOCK was checking kvm_arch.use_master_clock
outside of the pvclock sync lock. This is problematic, as the clock
value written to the user may or may not actually correspond to a stable
TSC.

Fix the race by populating the entire kvm_clock_data structure behind
the pvclock_gtod_sync_lock.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index fdc0c18339fb..2f3929bd5f58 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -2787,19 +2787,20 @@ static void kvm_update_masterclock(struct kvm *kvm)
 	kvm_end_pvclock_update(kvm);
 }
 
-u64 get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm *kvm)
+static void get_kvmclock(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_clock_data *data)
 {
 	struct kvm_arch *ka = &kvm->arch;
 	struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info hv_clock;
 	unsigned long flags;
-	u64 ret;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock, flags);
 	if (!ka->use_master_clock) {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock, flags);
-		return get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
+		data->clock = get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
+		return;
 	}
 
+	data->flags |= KVM_CLOCK_TSC_STABLE;
 	hv_clock.tsc_timestamp = ka->master_cycle_now;
 	hv_clock.system_time = ka->master_kernel_ns + ka->kvmclock_offset;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock, flags);
@@ -2811,13 +2812,26 @@ u64 get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm *kvm)
 		kvm_get_time_scale(NSEC_PER_SEC, __this_cpu_read(cpu_tsc_khz) * 1000LL,
 				   &hv_clock.tsc_shift,
 				   &hv_clock.tsc_to_system_mul);
-		ret = __pvclock_read_cycles(&hv_clock, rdtsc());
-	} else
-		ret = get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
+		data->clock = __pvclock_read_cycles(&hv_clock, rdtsc());
+	} else {
+		data->clock = get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
+	}
 
 	put_cpu();
+}
 
-	return ret;
+u64 get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	struct kvm_clock_data data;
+
+	/*
+	 * Zero flags as it's accessed RMW, leave everything else uninitialized
+	 * as clock is always written and no other fields are consumed.
+	 */
+	data.flags = 0;
+
+	get_kvmclock(kvm, &data);
+	return data.clock;
 }
 
 static void kvm_setup_pvclock_page(struct kvm_vcpu *v,
@@ -6098,11 +6112,14 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
 	}
 	case KVM_GET_CLOCK: {
 		struct kvm_clock_data user_ns;
-		u64 now_ns;
 
-		now_ns = get_kvmclock_ns(kvm);
-		user_ns.clock = now_ns;
-		user_ns.flags = kvm->arch.use_master_clock ? KVM_CLOCK_TSC_STABLE : 0;
+		/*
+		 * Zero flags as it is accessed RMW, leave everything else
+		 * uninitialized as clock is always written and no other fields
+		 * are consumed.
+		 */
+		user_ns.flags = 0;
+		get_kvmclock(kvm, &user_ns);
 		memset(&user_ns.pad, 0, sizeof(user_ns.pad));
 
 		r = -EFAULT;
-- 
2.33.0.rc1.237.g0d66db33f3-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-16  0:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-16  0:11 [PATCH v7 0/6] KVM: x86: Add idempotent controls for migrating system counter state Oliver Upton
2021-08-16  0:11 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16  0:11 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16  0:11 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2021-08-16  0:11   ` [PATCH v7 1/6] KVM: x86: Fix potential race in KVM_GET_CLOCK Oliver Upton
2021-08-16  0:11   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-19 18:24   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-08-19 18:24     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-08-19 18:24     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-08-20 18:22     ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-20 18:22       ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-20 18:22       ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] KVM: x86: Create helper methods for KVM_{GET,SET}_CLOCK ioctls Oliver Upton
2021-08-16  0:11   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16  0:11   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] KVM: x86: Report host tsc and realtime values in KVM_GET_CLOCK Oliver Upton
2021-08-16  0:11   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16  0:11   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-20 12:46   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-08-20 12:46     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-08-20 12:46     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-09-24  8:30     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-24  8:30       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-24  8:30       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-08-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] KVM: x86: Take the pvclock sync lock behind the tsc_write_lock Oliver Upton
2021-08-16  0:11   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16  0:11   ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-02 19:22   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-02 19:22     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-02 19:22     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] KVM: x86: Refactor tsc synchronization code Oliver Upton
2021-08-16  0:11   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16  0:11   ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-02 19:21   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-02 19:21     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-02 19:21     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-02 19:41     ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-02 19:41       ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-02 19:41       ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-24  9:28     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-24  9:28       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-24  9:28       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-08-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] KVM: x86: Expose TSC offset controls to userspace Oliver Upton
2021-08-16  0:11   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16  0:11   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-23 20:56   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-23 20:56     ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-23 20:56     ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-26 12:48     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-08-26 12:48       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-08-26 12:48       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-08-26 20:27       ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-26 20:27         ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-26 20:27         ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-29  8:25         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-02 19:23 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] KVM: x86: Add idempotent controls for migrating system counter state Sean Christopherson
2021-09-02 19:23   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-02 19:23   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-02 19:45   ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-02 19:45     ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-02 19:45     ` Oliver Upton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210816001130.3059564-2-oupton@google.com \
    --to=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.