All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Rob Clark" <robdclark@chromium.org>,
	"Rob Clark" <robdclark@gmail.com>, "Sean Paul" <sean@poorly.run>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/msm: Improve drm/sched point of no return rules
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:33:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210826093334.1117944-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210817085308.3557257-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Originally drm_sched_job_init was the point of no return, after which
drivers really should submit a job. I've split that up, which allows
us to fix this issue pretty easily.

Only thing we have to take care of is to not skip to error paths after
that. Other drivers do this the same for out-fence and similar things.

v2: It's not really a bugfix, just an improvement, since all
drm_sched_job_arm does is reserve the fence number. And gaps should be
fine, as long as the drm_sched_job doesn't escape anywhere at all.

For robustness it's still better to align with other drivers here and
not bail out after job_arm().

v3: I misplaced drm_sched_job_arm by _one_ line! Thanks to Rob for
testing and debug help.

Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
index 4d1c4d5f6a2a..71b8c8f752a3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
@@ -52,8 +52,6 @@ static struct msm_gem_submit *submit_create(struct drm_device *dev,
 		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 	}
 
-	drm_sched_job_arm(&job->base);
-
 	xa_init_flags(&submit->deps, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
 
 	kref_init(&submit->ref);
@@ -880,6 +878,8 @@ int msm_ioctl_gem_submit(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 
 	submit->nr_cmds = i;
 
+	drm_sched_job_arm(&submit->base);
+
 	submit->user_fence = dma_fence_get(&submit->base.s_fence->finished);
 
 	/*
@@ -891,17 +891,16 @@ int msm_ioctl_gem_submit(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 	if (submit->fence_id < 0) {
 		ret = submit->fence_id = 0;
 		submit->fence_id = 0;
-		goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (args->flags & MSM_SUBMIT_FENCE_FD_OUT) {
+	if (ret == 0 && args->flags & MSM_SUBMIT_FENCE_FD_OUT) {
 		struct sync_file *sync_file = sync_file_create(submit->user_fence);
 		if (!sync_file) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			goto out;
+		} else {
+			fd_install(out_fence_fd, sync_file->file);
+			args->fence_fd = out_fence_fd;
 		}
-		fd_install(out_fence_fd, sync_file->file);
-		args->fence_fd = out_fence_fd;
 	}
 
 	submit_attach_object_fences(submit);
-- 
2.32.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Rob Clark" <robdclark@chromium.org>,
	"Rob Clark" <robdclark@gmail.com>, "Sean Paul" <sean@poorly.run>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/msm: Improve drm/sched point of no return rules
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:33:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210826093334.1117944-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210817085308.3557257-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Originally drm_sched_job_init was the point of no return, after which
drivers really should submit a job. I've split that up, which allows
us to fix this issue pretty easily.

Only thing we have to take care of is to not skip to error paths after
that. Other drivers do this the same for out-fence and similar things.

v2: It's not really a bugfix, just an improvement, since all
drm_sched_job_arm does is reserve the fence number. And gaps should be
fine, as long as the drm_sched_job doesn't escape anywhere at all.

For robustness it's still better to align with other drivers here and
not bail out after job_arm().

v3: I misplaced drm_sched_job_arm by _one_ line! Thanks to Rob for
testing and debug help.

Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
index 4d1c4d5f6a2a..71b8c8f752a3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
@@ -52,8 +52,6 @@ static struct msm_gem_submit *submit_create(struct drm_device *dev,
 		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 	}
 
-	drm_sched_job_arm(&job->base);
-
 	xa_init_flags(&submit->deps, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
 
 	kref_init(&submit->ref);
@@ -880,6 +878,8 @@ int msm_ioctl_gem_submit(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 
 	submit->nr_cmds = i;
 
+	drm_sched_job_arm(&submit->base);
+
 	submit->user_fence = dma_fence_get(&submit->base.s_fence->finished);
 
 	/*
@@ -891,17 +891,16 @@ int msm_ioctl_gem_submit(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 	if (submit->fence_id < 0) {
 		ret = submit->fence_id = 0;
 		submit->fence_id = 0;
-		goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (args->flags & MSM_SUBMIT_FENCE_FD_OUT) {
+	if (ret == 0 && args->flags & MSM_SUBMIT_FENCE_FD_OUT) {
 		struct sync_file *sync_file = sync_file_create(submit->user_fence);
 		if (!sync_file) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			goto out;
+		} else {
+			fd_install(out_fence_fd, sync_file->file);
+			args->fence_fd = out_fence_fd;
 		}
-		fd_install(out_fence_fd, sync_file->file);
-		args->fence_fd = out_fence_fd;
 	}
 
 	submit_attach_object_fences(submit);
-- 
2.32.0


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-26  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-05 10:46 [PATCH v5 00/20] drm/sched dependency handling and implicit sync fixes Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 01/20] drm/sched: Split drm_sched_job_init Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 13:43   ` Christian König
2021-08-05 13:43     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-08-05 14:07     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 14:07       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 14:47       ` Christian König
2021-08-05 14:47         ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-08-05 15:07         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 15:07           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-17  8:49   ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-17  8:49     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 02/20] drm/msm: Fix drm/sched point of no return rules Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 23:02   ` Rob Clark
2021-08-05 23:02     ` [Intel-gfx] " Rob Clark
2021-08-06 16:41     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-06 16:41       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-06 17:19       ` Rob Clark
2021-08-06 17:19         ` [Intel-gfx] " Rob Clark
2021-08-06 18:41         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-06 18:41           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-06 19:01           ` Rob Clark
2021-08-06 19:01             ` [Intel-gfx] " Rob Clark
2021-08-06 19:10             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-06 19:10               ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-06 19:59               ` Rob Clark
2021-08-06 19:59                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rob Clark
2021-08-17  8:53   ` [PATCH] drm/msm: Improve " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-17  8:53     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-26  9:33     ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2021-08-26  9:33       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-26 15:38       ` Rob Clark
2021-08-26 15:38         ` Rob Clark
2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 03/20] drm/sched: Barriers are needed for entity->last_scheduled Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 13:45   ` Christian König
2021-08-05 13:45     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 04/20] drm/sched: Add dependency tracking Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 13:47   ` Christian König
2021-08-05 13:47     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 05/20] drm/sched: drop entity parameter from drm_sched_push_job Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 13:48   ` Christian König
2021-08-05 13:48     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 06/20] drm/sched: improve docs around drm_sched_entity Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 07/20] drm/panfrost: use scheduler dependency tracking Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 15:10   ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2021-08-05 15:10     ` [Intel-gfx] " Alyssa Rosenzweig
2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 08/20] drm/lima: " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-12 19:28   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-12 19:28     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-14  2:45     ` Qiang Yu
2021-08-14  2:45       ` [Intel-gfx] " Qiang Yu
2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 09/20] drm/v3d: Move drm_sched_job_init to v3d_job_init Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 10/20] drm/v3d: Use scheduler dependency handling Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 11/20] drm/etnaviv: " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-12 19:28   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-12 19:28     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 12/20] drm/msm: " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-12 19:29   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-12 19:29     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-26 16:12   ` Rob Clark
2021-08-26 16:12     ` [Intel-gfx] " Rob Clark
2021-08-30  9:01   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-30  9:01     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 13/20] drm/gem: Delete gem array fencing helpers Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-12 19:29   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-12 19:29     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 14/20] drm/sched: Don't store self-dependencies Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 13:18   ` Christian König
2021-08-05 13:18     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-08-05 13:25     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 13:25       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 13:57       ` Christian König
2021-08-05 13:57         ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-08-05 15:06         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 15:06           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 15/20] drm/sched: Check locking in drm_sched_job_await_implicit Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 13:19   ` Christian König
2021-08-05 13:19     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-08-05 13:27     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 13:27       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 16/20] drm/msm: Don't break exclusive fence ordering Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-26 16:16   ` Rob Clark
2021-08-26 16:16     ` [Intel-gfx] " Rob Clark
2021-08-26 16:16     ` Rob Clark
2021-08-30  9:02     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-30  9:02       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 17/20] drm/etnaviv: " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 18/20] drm/i915: delete exclude argument from i915_sw_fence_await_reservation Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 19/20] drm/i915: Don't break exclusive fence ordering Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 20/20] dma-resv: Give the docs a do-over Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 10:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-30 19:38   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-30 19:38     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-05 13:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/sched dependency handling and implicit sync fixes Patchwork
2021-08-05 14:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-08-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/sched dependency handling and implicit sync fixes (rev2) Patchwork
2021-08-17 16:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/sched dependency handling and implicit sync fixes (rev4) Patchwork
2021-08-17 16:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-08-17 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-08-26 13:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/sched dependency handling and implicit sync fixes (rev5) Patchwork
2021-08-26 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-08-26 21:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210826093334.1117944-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.