All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: Merge kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() and kvm_vcpu_first_run_init()
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:08:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211015090822.2994920-4-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211015090822.2994920-1-maz@kernel.org>

The kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() helper gets called on each PID
change. The kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() helper gets run on the...
first run(!) of a vcpu.

As it turns out, the first run of a vcpu also triggers a PID change
event (vcpu->pid is initially NULL).

Use this property to merge these two helpers and get rid of another
arm64-specific oddity.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index ccb59ac54976..30692497c4ea 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -583,22 +583,26 @@ static void update_vmid(struct kvm_vmid *vmid)
 	spin_unlock(&kvm_vmid_lock);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Handle both the initialisation that is being done when the vcpu is
+ * run for the first time, as well as the updates that must be
+ * performed each time we get a new thread dealing with this vcpu.
+ */
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
-	return kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(vcpu);
-}
-
-static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	if (likely(vcpu->arch.has_run_once))
-		return 0;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(vcpu))
 		return -EPERM;
 
+	ret = kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(vcpu);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (likely(vcpu->arch.has_run_once))
+		return 0;
+
 	vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
 
 	kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
@@ -778,10 +782,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (unlikely(!kvm_vcpu_initialized(vcpu)))
 		return -ENOEXEC;
 
-	ret = kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(vcpu);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
 	if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_MMIO) {
 		ret = kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu);
 		if (ret)
-- 
2.30.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: Merge kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() and kvm_vcpu_first_run_init()
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:08:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211015090822.2994920-4-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211015090822.2994920-1-maz@kernel.org>

The kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() helper gets called on each PID
change. The kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() helper gets run on the...
first run(!) of a vcpu.

As it turns out, the first run of a vcpu also triggers a PID change
event (vcpu->pid is initially NULL).

Use this property to merge these two helpers and get rid of another
arm64-specific oddity.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index ccb59ac54976..30692497c4ea 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -583,22 +583,26 @@ static void update_vmid(struct kvm_vmid *vmid)
 	spin_unlock(&kvm_vmid_lock);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Handle both the initialisation that is being done when the vcpu is
+ * run for the first time, as well as the updates that must be
+ * performed each time we get a new thread dealing with this vcpu.
+ */
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
-	return kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(vcpu);
-}
-
-static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	if (likely(vcpu->arch.has_run_once))
-		return 0;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(vcpu))
 		return -EPERM;
 
+	ret = kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(vcpu);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (likely(vcpu->arch.has_run_once))
+		return 0;
+
 	vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
 
 	kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
@@ -778,10 +782,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (unlikely(!kvm_vcpu_initialized(vcpu)))
 		return -ENOEXEC;
 
-	ret = kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(vcpu);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
 	if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_MMIO) {
 		ret = kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu);
 		if (ret)
-- 
2.30.2

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: Merge kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() and kvm_vcpu_first_run_init()
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:08:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211015090822.2994920-4-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211015090822.2994920-1-maz@kernel.org>

The kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() helper gets called on each PID
change. The kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() helper gets run on the...
first run(!) of a vcpu.

As it turns out, the first run of a vcpu also triggers a PID change
event (vcpu->pid is initially NULL).

Use this property to merge these two helpers and get rid of another
arm64-specific oddity.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index ccb59ac54976..30692497c4ea 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -583,22 +583,26 @@ static void update_vmid(struct kvm_vmid *vmid)
 	spin_unlock(&kvm_vmid_lock);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Handle both the initialisation that is being done when the vcpu is
+ * run for the first time, as well as the updates that must be
+ * performed each time we get a new thread dealing with this vcpu.
+ */
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
-	return kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(vcpu);
-}
-
-static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	if (likely(vcpu->arch.has_run_once))
-		return 0;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(vcpu))
 		return -EPERM;
 
+	ret = kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(vcpu);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (likely(vcpu->arch.has_run_once))
+		return 0;
+
 	vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
 
 	kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
@@ -778,10 +782,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (unlikely(!kvm_vcpu_initialized(vcpu)))
 		return -ENOEXEC;
 
-	ret = kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(vcpu);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
 	if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_MMIO) {
 		ret = kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu);
 		if (ret)
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-15  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-15  9:08 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: Reorganise vcpu first run Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: Move SVE state mapping at HYP to finalize-time Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:08   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:08   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: arm64: Move kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() out of line Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:08   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:08   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:08 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-10-15  9:08   ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: Merge kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() and kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:08   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: Restructure the point where has_run_once is advertised Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:08   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:08   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm64: Drop vcpu->arch.has_run_once for vcpu->pid Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:08   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:08   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-15  9:49 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: Reorganise vcpu first run Andrew Jones
2021-10-15  9:49   ` Andrew Jones
2021-10-15  9:49   ` Andrew Jones
2021-10-15 10:05   ` Andrew Jones
2021-10-15 10:05     ` Andrew Jones
2021-10-15 10:05     ` Andrew Jones
2021-10-16 10:49     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-16 10:49       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-16 10:49       ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211015090822.2994920-4-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.