All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
To: dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	lucas.demarchi@intel.com, <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Hellstrom Thomas <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>,
	Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/17] drm/i915/gtt/xehpsdv: move scratch page to system memory
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 19:56:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211021142627.31058-6-ramalingam.c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211021142627.31058-1-ramalingam.c@intel.com>

From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>

On some platforms the hw has dropped support for 4K GTT pages when
dealing with LMEM, and due to the design of 64K GTT pages in the hw, we
can only mark the *entire* page-table as operating in 64K GTT mode,
since the enable bit is still on the pde, and not the pte. And since we
we still need to allow 4K GTT pages for SMEM objects, we can't have a
"normal" 4K page-table with scratch pointing to LMEM, since that's
undefined from the hw pov. The simplest solution is to just move the 64K
scratch page to SMEM on such platforms and call it a day, since that
should work for all configurations.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c      |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c      | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c      |  2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c       |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h       |  2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c |  2 ++
 6 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c
index 890191f286e3..49e7651d764a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c
@@ -440,6 +440,7 @@ struct i915_ppgtt *gen6_ppgtt_create(struct intel_gt *gt)
 	ppgtt->base.vm.cleanup = gen6_ppgtt_cleanup;
 
 	ppgtt->base.vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ppgtt->base.vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 	ppgtt->base.vm.pte_encode = ggtt->vm.pte_encode;
 
 	ppgtt->base.pd = __alloc_pd(I915_PDES);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c
index 037a9a6e4889..6bff6bf1a450 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c
@@ -777,10 +777,29 @@ struct i915_ppgtt *gen8_ppgtt_create(struct intel_gt *gt,
 	 */
 	ppgtt->vm.has_read_only = !IS_GRAPHICS_VER(gt->i915, 11, 12);
 
-	if (HAS_LMEM(gt->i915))
+	if (HAS_LMEM(gt->i915)) {
 		ppgtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_lmem;
-	else
+
+		/*
+		 * On some platforms the hw has dropped support for 4K GTT pages
+		 * when dealing with LMEM, and due to the design of 64K GTT
+		 * pages in the hw, we can only mark the *entire* page-table as
+		 * operating in 64K GTT mode, since the enable bit is still on
+		 * the pde, and not the pte. And since we still need to allow
+		 * 4K GTT pages for SMEM objects, we can't have a "normal" 4K
+		 * page-table with scratch pointing to LMEM, since that's
+		 * undefined from the hw pov. The simplest solution is to just
+		 * move the 64K scratch page to SMEM on such platforms and call
+		 * it a day, since that should work for all configurations.
+		 */
+		if (HAS_64K_PAGES(gt->i915))
+			ppgtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+		else
+			ppgtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_lmem;
+	} else {
 		ppgtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+		ppgtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	}
 
 	err = gen8_init_scratch(&ppgtt->vm);
 	if (err)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
index f17383e76eb7..289316007029 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
@@ -1077,6 +1077,7 @@ static int gen6_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 	ggtt->vm.total = (size / sizeof(gen6_pte_t)) * I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
 
 	ggtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ggtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	ggtt->vm.clear_range = nop_clear_range;
 	if (!HAS_FULL_PPGTT(i915) || intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(i915))
@@ -1129,6 +1130,7 @@ static int i915_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 		(struct resource)DEFINE_RES_MEM(gmadr_base, ggtt->mappable_end);
 
 	ggtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ggtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	if (needs_idle_maps(i915)) {
 		drm_notice(&i915->drm,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
index 2a6eec5f0d58..56fbd37a6b54 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ int setup_scratch_page(struct i915_address_space *vm)
 	do {
 		struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
 
-		obj = vm->alloc_pt_dma(vm, size);
+		obj = vm->alloc_scratch_dma(vm, size);
 		if (IS_ERR(obj))
 			goto skip;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h
index bc6750263359..6d13f4ab4d4a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h
@@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ struct i915_address_space {
 
 	struct drm_i915_gem_object *
 		(*alloc_pt_dma)(struct i915_address_space *vm, int sz);
+	struct drm_i915_gem_object *
+		(*alloc_scratch_dma)(struct i915_address_space *vm, int sz);
 
 	u64 (*pte_encode)(dma_addr_t addr,
 			  enum i915_cache_level level,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c
index cc047ec594f9..32ca8962d0ab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct i915_ppgtt *mock_ppgtt(struct drm_i915_private *i915, const char *name)
 	i915_address_space_init(&ppgtt->vm, VM_CLASS_PPGTT);
 
 	ppgtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ppgtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	ppgtt->vm.clear_range = mock_clear_range;
 	ppgtt->vm.insert_page = mock_insert_page;
@@ -118,6 +119,7 @@ void mock_init_ggtt(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 	ggtt->vm.total = 4096 * PAGE_SIZE;
 
 	ggtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ggtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	ggtt->vm.clear_range = mock_clear_range;
 	ggtt->vm.insert_page = mock_insert_page;
-- 
2.20.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
To: dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	lucas.demarchi@intel.com, <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Hellstrom Thomas <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>,
	Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/17] drm/i915/gtt/xehpsdv: move scratch page to system memory
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 19:56:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211021142627.31058-6-ramalingam.c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211021142627.31058-1-ramalingam.c@intel.com>

From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>

On some platforms the hw has dropped support for 4K GTT pages when
dealing with LMEM, and due to the design of 64K GTT pages in the hw, we
can only mark the *entire* page-table as operating in 64K GTT mode,
since the enable bit is still on the pde, and not the pte. And since we
we still need to allow 4K GTT pages for SMEM objects, we can't have a
"normal" 4K page-table with scratch pointing to LMEM, since that's
undefined from the hw pov. The simplest solution is to just move the 64K
scratch page to SMEM on such platforms and call it a day, since that
should work for all configurations.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c      |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c      | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c      |  2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c       |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h       |  2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c |  2 ++
 6 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c
index 890191f286e3..49e7651d764a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c
@@ -440,6 +440,7 @@ struct i915_ppgtt *gen6_ppgtt_create(struct intel_gt *gt)
 	ppgtt->base.vm.cleanup = gen6_ppgtt_cleanup;
 
 	ppgtt->base.vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ppgtt->base.vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 	ppgtt->base.vm.pte_encode = ggtt->vm.pte_encode;
 
 	ppgtt->base.pd = __alloc_pd(I915_PDES);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c
index 037a9a6e4889..6bff6bf1a450 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c
@@ -777,10 +777,29 @@ struct i915_ppgtt *gen8_ppgtt_create(struct intel_gt *gt,
 	 */
 	ppgtt->vm.has_read_only = !IS_GRAPHICS_VER(gt->i915, 11, 12);
 
-	if (HAS_LMEM(gt->i915))
+	if (HAS_LMEM(gt->i915)) {
 		ppgtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_lmem;
-	else
+
+		/*
+		 * On some platforms the hw has dropped support for 4K GTT pages
+		 * when dealing with LMEM, and due to the design of 64K GTT
+		 * pages in the hw, we can only mark the *entire* page-table as
+		 * operating in 64K GTT mode, since the enable bit is still on
+		 * the pde, and not the pte. And since we still need to allow
+		 * 4K GTT pages for SMEM objects, we can't have a "normal" 4K
+		 * page-table with scratch pointing to LMEM, since that's
+		 * undefined from the hw pov. The simplest solution is to just
+		 * move the 64K scratch page to SMEM on such platforms and call
+		 * it a day, since that should work for all configurations.
+		 */
+		if (HAS_64K_PAGES(gt->i915))
+			ppgtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+		else
+			ppgtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_lmem;
+	} else {
 		ppgtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+		ppgtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	}
 
 	err = gen8_init_scratch(&ppgtt->vm);
 	if (err)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
index f17383e76eb7..289316007029 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
@@ -1077,6 +1077,7 @@ static int gen6_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 	ggtt->vm.total = (size / sizeof(gen6_pte_t)) * I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
 
 	ggtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ggtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	ggtt->vm.clear_range = nop_clear_range;
 	if (!HAS_FULL_PPGTT(i915) || intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(i915))
@@ -1129,6 +1130,7 @@ static int i915_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 		(struct resource)DEFINE_RES_MEM(gmadr_base, ggtt->mappable_end);
 
 	ggtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ggtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	if (needs_idle_maps(i915)) {
 		drm_notice(&i915->drm,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
index 2a6eec5f0d58..56fbd37a6b54 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ int setup_scratch_page(struct i915_address_space *vm)
 	do {
 		struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
 
-		obj = vm->alloc_pt_dma(vm, size);
+		obj = vm->alloc_scratch_dma(vm, size);
 		if (IS_ERR(obj))
 			goto skip;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h
index bc6750263359..6d13f4ab4d4a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h
@@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ struct i915_address_space {
 
 	struct drm_i915_gem_object *
 		(*alloc_pt_dma)(struct i915_address_space *vm, int sz);
+	struct drm_i915_gem_object *
+		(*alloc_scratch_dma)(struct i915_address_space *vm, int sz);
 
 	u64 (*pte_encode)(dma_addr_t addr,
 			  enum i915_cache_level level,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c
index cc047ec594f9..32ca8962d0ab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct i915_ppgtt *mock_ppgtt(struct drm_i915_private *i915, const char *name)
 	i915_address_space_init(&ppgtt->vm, VM_CLASS_PPGTT);
 
 	ppgtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ppgtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	ppgtt->vm.clear_range = mock_clear_range;
 	ppgtt->vm.insert_page = mock_insert_page;
@@ -118,6 +119,7 @@ void mock_init_ggtt(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 	ggtt->vm.total = 4096 * PAGE_SIZE;
 
 	ggtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ggtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	ggtt->vm.clear_range = mock_clear_range;
 	ggtt->vm.insert_page = mock_insert_page;
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-21 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-21 14:26 [PATCH v2 00/17] drm/i915/dg2: Enabling 64k page size and flat ccs Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] drm/i915: Add has_64k_pages flag Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-22  6:47   ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] drm/i915/xehpsdv: set min page-size to 64K Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-22  6:47   ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-10-22  6:47     ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] drm/i915/xehpsdv: enforce min GTT alignment Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] drm/i915: enforce min page size for scratch Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26 ` Ramalingam C [this message]
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/17] drm/i915/gtt/xehpsdv: move scratch page to system memory Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] drm/i915/xehpsdv: support 64K GTT pages Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-22 17:04   ` Matthew Auld
2021-10-22 17:04     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] drm/i915: Add vm min alignment support Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-22 16:56   ` Matthew Auld
2021-10-22 16:56     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] drm/i915/selftests: account for min_alignment in GTT selftests Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] drm/i915/xehpsdv: implement memory coloring Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] drm/i915/xehpsdv: Add has_flat_ccs to device info Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] drm/i915/lmem: Enable lmem for platforms with Flat CCS Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] drm/i915/gt: Clear compress metadata for Xe_HP platforms Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] drm/i915/dg2: Tile 4 plane format support Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:27   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2021-10-21 14:27     ` [Intel-gfx] " Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2021-10-26 15:08     ` Ramalingam C
2021-10-26 15:08       ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] uapi/drm/dg2: Format modifier for DG2 unified compression and clear color Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:28   ` Simon Ser
2021-10-21 14:28     ` [Intel-gfx] " Simon Ser
2021-10-21 14:35   ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-21 14:35     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-25 11:20     ` Juha-Pekka Heikkila
2021-10-26 15:44       ` Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] drm/i915/uapi: document behaviour for DG2 64K support Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] drm/i915/Flat-CCS: Document on Flat-CCS memory compression Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] Doc/gpu/rfc/i915: i915 DG2 uAPI Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 14:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2021-10-21 16:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dg2: Enabling 64k page size and flat ccs (rev2) Patchwork
2021-10-21 16:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-10-21 16:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-10-25 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/17] drm/i915/dg2: Enabling 64k page size and flat ccs Robert Beckett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211021142627.31058-6-ramalingam.c@intel.com \
    --to=ramalingam.c@intel.com \
    --cc=cq.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.