All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] blk-mq: rename hctx_lock & hctx_unlock
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 10:18:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211119021849.2259254-3-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211119021849.2259254-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

We have moved srcu from 'struct blk_mq_hw_ctx' into 'struct request_queue',
both hctx_lock and hctx_unlock are run on request queue level, so rename
them as queue_lock and queue_unlock().

And it could be used for supporting Jens's ->queue_rqs(), as suggested
by Keith.

Also it could be extended for driver uses in future.

Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 9728a571b009..ba0d0e411b65 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1076,24 +1076,26 @@ void blk_mq_complete_request(struct request *rq)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_complete_request);
 
-static inline void hctx_unlock(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, int srcu_idx)
-	__releases(hctx->srcu)
+static inline void queue_unlock(struct request_queue *q, bool blocking,
+		int srcu_idx)
+	__releases(q->srcu)
 {
-	if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING))
+	if (!blocking)
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 	else
-		srcu_read_unlock(hctx->queue->srcu, srcu_idx);
+		srcu_read_unlock(q->srcu, srcu_idx);
 }
 
-static inline void hctx_lock(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, int *srcu_idx)
+static inline void queue_lock(struct request_queue *q, bool blocking,
+		int *srcu_idx)
 	__acquires(hctx->srcu)
 {
-	if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)) {
+	if (!blocking) {
 		/* shut up gcc false positive */
 		*srcu_idx = 0;
 		rcu_read_lock();
 	} else
-		*srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(hctx->queue->srcu);
+		*srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(q->srcu);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1958,6 +1960,7 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct list_head *list,
 static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
 	int srcu_idx;
+	bool blocking = hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING;
 
 	/*
 	 * We can't run the queue inline with ints disabled. Ensure that
@@ -1965,11 +1968,11 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 	 */
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_interrupt());
 
-	might_sleep_if(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING);
+	might_sleep_if(blocking);
 
-	hctx_lock(hctx, &srcu_idx);
+	queue_lock(hctx->queue, blocking, &srcu_idx);
 	blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(hctx);
-	hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
+	queue_unlock(hctx->queue, blocking, srcu_idx);
 }
 
 static inline int blk_mq_first_mapped_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
@@ -2083,6 +2086,7 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async)
 {
 	int srcu_idx;
 	bool need_run;
+	bool blocking = hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING;
 
 	/*
 	 * When queue is quiesced, we may be switching io scheduler, or
@@ -2092,10 +2096,10 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async)
 	 * And queue will be rerun in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() if it is
 	 * quiesced.
 	 */
-	hctx_lock(hctx, &srcu_idx);
+	queue_lock(hctx->queue, blocking, &srcu_idx);
 	need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) &&
 		blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx);
-	hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
+	queue_unlock(hctx->queue, blocking, srcu_idx);
 
 	if (need_run)
 		__blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, async, 0);
@@ -2500,10 +2504,11 @@ static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 {
 	blk_status_t ret;
 	int srcu_idx;
+	bool blocking = hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING;
 
-	might_sleep_if(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING);
+	might_sleep_if(blocking);
 
-	hctx_lock(hctx, &srcu_idx);
+	queue_lock(hctx->queue, blocking, &srcu_idx);
 
 	ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, false, true);
 	if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE || ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE)
@@ -2511,7 +2516,7 @@ static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 	else if (ret != BLK_STS_OK)
 		blk_mq_end_request(rq, ret);
 
-	hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
+	queue_unlock(hctx->queue, blocking, srcu_idx);
 }
 
 static blk_status_t blk_mq_request_issue_directly(struct request *rq, bool last)
@@ -2519,10 +2524,11 @@ static blk_status_t blk_mq_request_issue_directly(struct request *rq, bool last)
 	blk_status_t ret;
 	int srcu_idx;
 	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = rq->mq_hctx;
+	bool blocking = hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING;
 
-	hctx_lock(hctx, &srcu_idx);
+	queue_lock(hctx->queue, blocking, &srcu_idx);
 	ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, true, last);
-	hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
+	queue_unlock(hctx->queue, blocking, srcu_idx);
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-19  2:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-19  2:18 [PATCH 0/5] blk-mq: quiesce improvement Ming Lei
2021-11-19  2:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: move srcu from blk_mq_hw_ctx to request_queue Ming Lei
2021-11-19  4:30   ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19  8:10     ` Ming Lei
2021-11-22  7:48       ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-22 13:08         ` Ming Lei
2021-11-22 13:47           ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-19  2:18 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-11-22  7:53   ` [PATCH 2/5] blk-mq: rename hctx_lock & hctx_unlock Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-22 13:20     ` Ming Lei
2021-11-22 13:50       ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-23  0:08         ` Ming Lei
2021-11-23  8:54           ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-22  9:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-19  2:18 ` [PATCH 3/5] blk-mq: add helper of blk_mq_global_quiesce_wait() Ming Lei
2021-11-22  7:56   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-22  8:00     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-22 13:26     ` Ming Lei
2021-11-22 13:55       ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-23  0:17         ` Ming Lei
2021-11-23  9:00           ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-30  2:33             ` Ming Lei
2021-12-08 12:49               ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-12-10  2:02                 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-19  2:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme: quiesce namespace queue in parallel Ming Lei
2021-11-22  8:07   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-23  0:13     ` Ming Lei
2021-11-19  2:18 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: use blk-mq quiesce APIs to implement scsi_host_block Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211119021849.2259254-3-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.