All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/16] drm/i915: Ensure i915_vma tests do not get -ENOSPC with the locking changes.
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:47:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211129134735.628712-10-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211129134735.628712-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

Now that we require locking to evict, multiple vmas from the same object
might not be evicted. This is expected and required, because execbuf will
move to short-term pinning by using the lock only. This will cause these
tests to fail, because they create a ton of vma's for the same object.

Unbind manually to prevent spurious -ENOSPC in those mock tests.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c
index 1f10fe36619b..5c5809dfe9b2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c
@@ -691,7 +691,11 @@ static int igt_vma_rotate_remap(void *arg)
 					}
 
 					i915_vma_unpin(vma);
-
+					err = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
+					if (err) {
+						pr_err("Unbinding returned %i\n", err);
+						goto out_object;
+					}
 					cond_resched();
 				}
 			}
@@ -848,6 +852,11 @@ static int igt_vma_partial(void *arg)
 
 				i915_vma_unpin(vma);
 				nvma++;
+				err = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
+				if (err) {
+					pr_err("Unbinding returned %i\n", err);
+					goto out_object;
+				}
 
 				cond_resched();
 			}
@@ -882,6 +891,12 @@ static int igt_vma_partial(void *arg)
 
 		i915_vma_unpin(vma);
 
+		err = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
+		if (err) {
+			pr_err("Unbinding returned %i\n", err);
+			goto out_object;
+		}
+
 		count = 0;
 		list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma.list, obj_link)
 			count++;
-- 
2.34.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/16] drm/i915: Ensure i915_vma tests do not get -ENOSPC with the locking changes.
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:47:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211129134735.628712-10-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211129134735.628712-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

Now that we require locking to evict, multiple vmas from the same object
might not be evicted. This is expected and required, because execbuf will
move to short-term pinning by using the lock only. This will cause these
tests to fail, because they create a ton of vma's for the same object.

Unbind manually to prevent spurious -ENOSPC in those mock tests.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c
index 1f10fe36619b..5c5809dfe9b2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c
@@ -691,7 +691,11 @@ static int igt_vma_rotate_remap(void *arg)
 					}
 
 					i915_vma_unpin(vma);
-
+					err = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
+					if (err) {
+						pr_err("Unbinding returned %i\n", err);
+						goto out_object;
+					}
 					cond_resched();
 				}
 			}
@@ -848,6 +852,11 @@ static int igt_vma_partial(void *arg)
 
 				i915_vma_unpin(vma);
 				nvma++;
+				err = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
+				if (err) {
+					pr_err("Unbinding returned %i\n", err);
+					goto out_object;
+				}
 
 				cond_resched();
 			}
@@ -882,6 +891,12 @@ static int igt_vma_partial(void *arg)
 
 		i915_vma_unpin(vma);
 
+		err = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
+		if (err) {
+			pr_err("Unbinding returned %i\n", err);
+			goto out_object;
+		}
+
 		count = 0;
 		list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma.list, obj_link)
 			count++;
-- 
2.34.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-29 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-29 13:47 [PATCH v2 00/16] drm/i915: Remove short term pins from execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] drm/i915: Remove unused bits of i915_vma/active api Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] drm/i915: Change shrink ordering to use locking around unbinding Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] drm/i915: Remove pages_mutex and intel_gtt->vma_ops.set/clear_pages members, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-06 13:13   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-06 15:18     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-06 17:00       ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-07 18:15         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-12-06 17:10   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-07 10:06     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-07 10:45       ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] drm/i915: Take object lock in i915_ggtt_pin if ww is not set Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-06 13:18   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-06 13:18     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] drm/i915: Force ww lock for i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-30  9:20   ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Force ww lock for i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-30  9:20     ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-01 15:07     ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-01 15:07       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] drm/i915: Ensure gem_contexts selftests work with unbind changes Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-07 10:44   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-07 10:44     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 13:20     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-08 13:20       ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] drm/i915: Take trylock during eviction, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-07 11:01   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 13:28     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] drm/i915: Pass trylock context to callers Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-07 14:26   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-07 14:26     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2021-11-29 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/16] drm/i915: Ensure i915_vma tests do not get -ENOSPC with the locking changes Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-08 11:49   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 12:01     ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] drm/i915: Make i915_gem_evict_vm work correctly for already locked objects Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-08 12:07   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 13:34     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] drm/i915: Call i915_gem_evict_vm in vm_fault_gtt to prevent new ENOSPC errors Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 12:17   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 12:59     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] drm/i915: Add i915_vma_unbind_unlocked, and take obj lock for i915_vma_unbind Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 13:05   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 13:05     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 13:25     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 13:25       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 13:40       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 13:40         ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 13:45         ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 13:45           ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 14:27           ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 14:27             ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] drm/i915: Require object lock when freeing pages during destruction Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] drm/i915: Remove assert_object_held_shared Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 13:07   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 13:07     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] drm/i915: Remove support for unlocked i915_vma unbind Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] drm/i915: Remove short-term pins from execbuf, v5 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 16:22   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 16:22     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove short term pins from execbuf Patchwork
2021-11-29 15:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-11-29 15:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-11-29 16:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-11-30  8:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/16] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-30 11:17   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-30 18:38     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-12-01 11:15       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-01 13:11         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-30 11:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove short term pins from execbuf. (rev2) Patchwork
2021-11-30 11:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-11-30 11:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-11-30 11:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-11-30 14:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211129134735.628712-10-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.