All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
	Fabian Stelzer <fs@gigacodes.de>,
	Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/15] t/chainlint/one-liner: avoid overly intimate chainlint.sed knowledge
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 01:30:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211213063059.19424-5-sunshine@sunshineco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211213063059.19424-1-sunshine@sunshineco.com>

The purpose of chainlint.sed is to detect &&-chain breakage only within
subshells (one level deep); it doesn't bother checking for top-level
&&-chain breakage since the &&-chain checker built into t/test-lib.sh
should detect broken &&-chains outside of subshells by making them
magically exit with code 117.

Unfortunately, one of the chainlint.sed self-tests has overly intimate
knowledge of this particular division of responsibilities and only cares
about what chainlint.sed itself will produce, while ignoring the fact
that a more all-encompassing linter would complain about a broken
&&-chain outside the subshell. This makes it difficult to re-use the
test with a more capable chainlint implementation should one ever be
developed. Therefore, adjust the test and its "expected" output to
avoid being specific to the tunnel-vision of this one implementation.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
---
 t/chainlint/one-liner.expect | 2 +-
 t/chainlint/one-liner.test   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/chainlint/one-liner.expect b/t/chainlint/one-liner.expect
index 237f227349..c64058f7af 100644
--- a/t/chainlint/one-liner.expect
+++ b/t/chainlint/one-liner.expect
@@ -4,6 +4,6 @@
 
 ?!SEMI?!(foo; bar) &&
 ?!SEMI?!(foo; bar) |
-?!SEMI?!(foo; bar) >baz
+?!SEMI?!(foo; bar) >baz &&
 
 (foo "bar; baz")
diff --git a/t/chainlint/one-liner.test b/t/chainlint/one-liner.test
index 69796d7505..be9858fa29 100644
--- a/t/chainlint/one-liner.test
+++ b/t/chainlint/one-liner.test
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 # LINT: top-level one-liner subshell missing internal "&&" and broken &&-chain
 (foo; bar) &&
 (foo; bar) |
-(foo; bar) >baz
+(foo; bar) >baz &&
 
 # LINT: ";" in string not misinterpreted as broken &&-chain
 (foo "bar; baz")
-- 
2.34.1.397.gfae76fe5da


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-13  6:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-13  6:30 [PATCH 00/15] generalize chainlint self-tests Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13  6:30 ` [PATCH 01/15] t/chainlint/*.test: don't use invalid shell syntax Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13  6:30 ` [PATCH 02/15] t/chainlint/*.test: fix invalid test cases due to mixing quote types Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13  6:30 ` [PATCH 03/15] t/chainlint/*.test: generalize self-test commentary Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13  6:30 ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2021-12-13  6:30 ` [PATCH 05/15] t/Makefile: optimize chainlint self-test Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 10:09   ` [RFC PATCH] t/Makefile: use dependency graph for "check-chainlint" Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-14  7:44     ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-14 12:34       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-13 10:22   ` [PATCH 05/15] t/Makefile: optimize chainlint self-test Fabian Stelzer
2021-12-13 14:27     ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 15:43       ` Fabian Stelzer
2021-12-13 16:02         ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 16:11           ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-13 17:05             ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 17:25               ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 19:33                 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-13 21:37                   ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 16:14           ` Fabian Stelzer
2021-12-16 13:17         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-16 15:47           ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-16 19:26             ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-13  6:30 ` [PATCH 06/15] chainlint.sed: improve ?!AMP?! placement accuracy Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13  6:30 ` [PATCH 07/15] chainlint.sed: improve ?!SEMI?! " Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13  6:30 ` [PATCH 08/15] chainlint.sed: tolerate harmless ";" at end of last line in block Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13  6:30 ` [PATCH 09/15] chainlint.sed: drop unnecessary distinction between ?!AMP?! and ?!SEMI?! Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13  6:30 ` [PATCH 10/15] chainlint.sed: drop subshell-closing ">" annotation Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13  6:30 ` [PATCH 11/15] chainlint.sed: make here-doc "<<-" operator recognition more POSIX-like Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13  6:30 ` [PATCH 12/15] chainlint.sed: don't mistake `<< word` in string as here-doc operator Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13  6:30 ` [PATCH 13/15] chainlint.sed: stop throwing away here-doc tags Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13  6:30 ` [PATCH 14/15] chainlint.sed: swallow comments consistently Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13  6:30 ` [PATCH 15/15] chainlint.sed: stop splitting "(..." into separate lines "(" and "..." Eric Sunshine
2021-12-15  0:00 ` [PATCH 00/15] generalize chainlint self-tests Elijah Newren
2021-12-15  3:15   ` Eric Sunshine

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211213063059.19424-5-sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    --to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    --cc=fs@gigacodes.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.