All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
	Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] block: limit request dispatch loop duration
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:26:41 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220318022641.133484-1-shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> (raw)

When IO requests are made continuously and the target block device
handles requests faster than request arrival, the request dispatch loop
keeps on repeating to dispatch the arriving requests very long time,
more than a minute. Since the loop runs as a workqueue worker task, the
very long loop duration triggers workqueue watchdog timeout and BUG [1].

To avoid the very long loop duration, break the loop periodically. When
opportunity to dispatch requests still exists, check need_resched(). If
need_resched() returns true, the dispatch loop already consumed its time
slice, then reschedule the dispatch work and break the loop. With heavy
IO load, need_resched() does not return true for 20~30 seconds. To cover
such case, check time spent in the dispatch loop with jiffies. If more
than 1 second is spent, reschedule the dispatch work and break the loop.

[1]

[  609.691437] BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=10 node=1 flags=0x0 nice=-20 stuck for 35s!
[  609.701820] Showing busy workqueues and worker pools:
[  609.707915] workqueue events: flags=0x0
[  609.712615]   pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/256 refcnt=2
[  609.712626]     pending: drm_fb_helper_damage_work [drm_kms_helper]
[  609.712687] workqueue events_freezable: flags=0x4
[  609.732943]   pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/256 refcnt=2
[  609.732952]     pending: pci_pme_list_scan
[  609.732968] workqueue events_power_efficient: flags=0x80
[  609.751947]   pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/256 refcnt=2
[  609.751955]     pending: neigh_managed_work
[  609.752018] workqueue kblockd: flags=0x18
[  609.769480]   pwq 21: cpus=10 node=1 flags=0x0 nice=-20 active=3/256 refcnt=4
[  609.769488]     in-flight: 1020:blk_mq_run_work_fn
[  609.769498]     pending: blk_mq_timeout_work, blk_mq_run_work_fn
[  609.769744] pool 21: cpus=10 node=1 flags=0x0 nice=-20 hung=35s workers=2 idle: 67
[  639.899730] BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=10 node=1 flags=0x0 nice=-20 stuck for 66s!
[  639.909513] Showing busy workqueues and worker pools:
[  639.915404] workqueue events: flags=0x0
[  639.920197]   pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/256 refcnt=2
[  639.920215]     pending: drm_fb_helper_damage_work [drm_kms_helper]
[  639.920365] workqueue kblockd: flags=0x18
[  639.939932]   pwq 21: cpus=10 node=1 flags=0x0 nice=-20 active=3/256 refcnt=4
[  639.939942]     in-flight: 1020:blk_mq_run_work_fn
[  639.939955]     pending: blk_mq_timeout_work, blk_mq_run_work_fn
[  639.940212] pool 21: cpus=10 node=1 flags=0x0 nice=-20 hung=66s workers=2 idle: 67

Fixes: 6e6fcbc27e778 ("blk-mq: support batching dispatch in case of io")
Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20220310091649.zypaem5lkyfadymg@shindev/
---
Changes from v1:
* Inverted logic of jiffies and end time comparison
* Improved readability per comment on the list

 block/blk-mq-sched.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
index 55488ba97823..80e0eb26b697 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -180,11 +180,18 @@ static int __blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 
 static int blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
+	unsigned long end = jiffies + HZ;
 	int ret;
 
 	do {
 		ret = __blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
-	} while (ret == 1);
+		if (ret != 1)
+			break;
+		if (need_resched() || time_is_before_jiffies(end)) {
+			blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, 0);
+			break;
+		}
+	} while (1);
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-03-18  2:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-18  2:26 Shin'ichiro Kawasaki [this message]
2022-03-18  2:40 ` [PATCH v2] block: limit request dispatch loop duration Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220318022641.133484-1-shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    --to=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.