From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> To: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Subject: [Patch v2 2/3] mm/memcg: set pos explicitly for reclaim and !reclaim Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 23:47:18 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220330234719.18340-3-richard.weiyang@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220330234719.18340-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com> During mem_cgroup_iter, there are two ways to get iteration position: reclaim vs non-reclaim mode. Let's do it explicitly for reclaim vs non-reclaim mode. Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> --- v2: split into two explicit part as suggested by Johannes --- mm/memcontrol.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index eed9916cdce5..5d433b79ba47 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1005,9 +1005,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_iter(struct mem_cgroup *root, if (!root) root = root_mem_cgroup; - if (prev && !reclaim) - pos = prev; - rcu_read_lock(); if (reclaim) { @@ -1033,6 +1030,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_iter(struct mem_cgroup *root, */ (void)cmpxchg(&iter->position, pos, NULL); } + } else if (prev) { + pos = prev; } if (pos) -- 2.33.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> To: hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org, mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, vdavydov.dev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Wei Yang <richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Subject: [Patch v2 2/3] mm/memcg: set pos explicitly for reclaim and !reclaim Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 23:47:18 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220330234719.18340-3-richard.weiyang@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220330234719.18340-1-richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> During mem_cgroup_iter, there are two ways to get iteration position: reclaim vs non-reclaim mode. Let's do it explicitly for reclaim vs non-reclaim mode. Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> --- v2: split into two explicit part as suggested by Johannes --- mm/memcontrol.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index eed9916cdce5..5d433b79ba47 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1005,9 +1005,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_iter(struct mem_cgroup *root, if (!root) root = root_mem_cgroup; - if (prev && !reclaim) - pos = prev; - rcu_read_lock(); if (reclaim) { @@ -1033,6 +1030,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_iter(struct mem_cgroup *root, */ (void)cmpxchg(&iter->position, pos, NULL); } + } else if (prev) { + pos = prev; } if (pos) -- 2.33.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-30 23:47 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-03-30 23:47 [Patch v2 0/3] mm/memcg: some cleanup for mem_cgroup_iter() Wei Yang 2022-03-30 23:47 ` Wei Yang 2022-03-30 23:47 ` [Patch v2 1/3] mm/memcg: set memcg after css verified and got reference Wei Yang 2022-03-30 23:47 ` Wei Yang 2022-03-31 0:20 ` Roman Gushchin 2022-03-31 0:20 ` Roman Gushchin 2022-03-30 23:47 ` Wei Yang [this message] 2022-03-30 23:47 ` [Patch v2 2/3] mm/memcg: set pos explicitly for reclaim and !reclaim Wei Yang 2022-03-31 0:21 ` Roman Gushchin 2022-03-31 0:21 ` Roman Gushchin 2022-03-31 15:03 ` Johannes Weiner 2022-03-31 15:03 ` Johannes Weiner 2022-03-30 23:47 ` [Patch v2 3/3] mm/memcg: move generation assignment and comparison together Wei Yang 2022-03-30 23:47 ` Wei Yang 2022-03-31 0:28 ` Roman Gushchin 2022-03-31 0:28 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220330234719.18340-3-richard.weiyang@gmail.com \ --to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \ --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.