All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
To: <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>, <david@redhat.com>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com>,
	<baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>, <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	<liuyuntao10@huawei.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	<dave@stgolabs.net>, <liupeng256@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4] hugetlb: Fix wrong use of nr_online_nodes
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 10:35:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220416103526.3287348-1-liupeng256@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220413032915.251254-2-liupeng256@huawei.com>

Certain systems are designed to have sparse/discontiguous nodes. In
this case, nr_online_nodes can not be used to walk through numa node.
Also, a valid node may be greater than nr_online_nodes.

However, in hugetlb, it is assumed that nodes are contiguous. Recheck
all the places that use nr_online_nodes, and repair them one by one.

Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Fixes: 4178158ef8ca ("hugetlbfs: fix issue of preallocation of gigantic pages can't work")
Fixes: b5389086ad7b ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation")
Fixes: e79ce9832316 ("hugetlbfs: fix a truncation issue in hugepages parameter")
Fixes: f9317f77a6e0 ("hugetlb: clean up potential spectre issue warnings")
Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
---
v3->v4:
 Make sure nid is valid before use node_online, and __alloc_bootmem_huge_page
 is no need to check node_online, which is suggested by Kefeng.

 mm/hugetlb.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index b34f50156f7e..a386c5f94932 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -2979,8 +2979,6 @@ int __alloc_bootmem_huge_page(struct hstate *h, int nid)
 	struct huge_bootmem_page *m = NULL; /* initialize for clang */
 	int nr_nodes, node;
 
-	if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE && nid >= nr_online_nodes)
-		return 0;
 	/* do node specific alloc */
 	if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) {
 		m = memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(huge_page_size(h), huge_page_size(h),
@@ -3088,7 +3086,7 @@ static void __init hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages(struct hstate *h)
 	}
 
 	/* do node specific alloc */
-	for (i = 0; i < nr_online_nodes; i++) {
+	for_each_online_node(i) {
 		if (h->max_huge_pages_node[i] > 0) {
 			hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages_onenode(h, i);
 			node_specific_alloc = true;
@@ -4049,7 +4047,7 @@ static int __init hugetlb_init(void)
 			default_hstate.max_huge_pages =
 				default_hstate_max_huge_pages;
 
-			for (i = 0; i < nr_online_nodes; i++)
+			for_each_online_node(i)
 				default_hstate.max_huge_pages_node[i] =
 					default_hugepages_in_node[i];
 		}
@@ -4164,9 +4162,9 @@ static int __init hugepages_setup(char *s)
 				pr_warn("HugeTLB: architecture can't support node specific alloc, ignoring!\n");
 				return 0;
 			}
-			if (tmp >= nr_online_nodes)
+			if (tmp >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(tmp))
 				goto invalid;
-			node = array_index_nospec(tmp, nr_online_nodes);
+			node = array_index_nospec(tmp, MAX_NUMNODES);
 			p += count + 1;
 			/* Parse hugepages */
 			if (sscanf(p, "%lu%n", &tmp, &count) != 1)
@@ -4294,7 +4292,7 @@ static int __init default_hugepagesz_setup(char *s)
 	 */
 	if (default_hstate_max_huge_pages) {
 		default_hstate.max_huge_pages = default_hstate_max_huge_pages;
-		for (i = 0; i < nr_online_nodes; i++)
+		for_each_online_node(i)
 			default_hstate.max_huge_pages_node[i] =
 				default_hugepages_in_node[i];
 		if (hstate_is_gigantic(&default_hstate))
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-16 10:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-13  3:29 [PATCH v3 0/4] hugetlb: Fix some incorrect behavior Peng Liu
2022-04-13  3:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] hugetlb: Fix wrong use of nr_online_nodes Peng Liu
2022-04-13  4:42   ` Andrew Morton
2022-04-13  6:27     ` liupeng (DM)
2022-04-13 22:04       ` Andrew Morton
2022-04-14  1:28         ` liupeng (DM)
2022-04-13  6:29   ` Baolin Wang
2022-04-14 23:36   ` Mike Kravetz
2022-04-15  2:09   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2022-04-15  5:41     ` Kefeng Wang
2022-04-15  7:01       ` liupeng (DM)
2022-04-16  1:21       ` Kefeng Wang
2022-04-19  4:40         ` Andrew Morton
2022-04-19  8:54           ` Kefeng Wang
2022-04-16 10:35   ` Peng Liu [this message]
2022-04-18  5:53     ` [PATCH v4] " Kefeng Wang
2022-04-19  4:03     ` Andrew Morton
2022-04-19 14:07       ` Kefeng Wang
2022-04-20  6:17         ` liupeng (DM)
2022-04-29  9:32     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-13  3:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] hugetlb: Fix hugepages_setup when deal with pernode Peng Liu
2022-04-14 23:50   ` Mike Kravetz
2022-04-29  9:30   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-13  3:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] hugetlb: Fix return value of __setup handlers Peng Liu
2022-04-13  6:39   ` Baolin Wang
2022-04-13  7:55   ` Muchun Song
2022-04-13  8:16     ` liupeng (DM)
2022-04-13  8:21       ` Muchun Song
2022-04-13  8:45         ` Kefeng Wang
2022-04-13  9:01           ` Muchun Song
2022-04-15  0:01   ` Mike Kravetz
2022-04-15  2:24   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2022-04-29  2:43   ` [PATCH v4] mm: Using for_each_online_node and node_online instead of open coding Peng Liu
2022-04-29  3:02     ` Peng Liu
2022-04-29  9:29     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-29  9:29       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-29 11:44     ` Muchun Song
2022-04-29 11:44       ` Muchun Song
2022-04-13  3:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] hugetlb: Clean up hugetlb_cma_reserve Peng Liu
2022-04-13  5:50   ` Muchun Song
2022-04-13  6:41   ` Baolin Wang
2022-04-15  0:03   ` Mike Kravetz
2022-04-15  2:15   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2022-04-15  7:03     ` liupeng (DM)
2022-04-29  9:28   ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220416103526.3287348-1-liupeng256@huawei.com \
    --to=liupeng256@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=liuyuntao10@huawei.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yaozhenguo1@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.