All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
	Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	Hellstrom Thomas <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/i915/selftests: Check for incomplete LRI from the context image
Date: Mon,  2 May 2022 16:40:01 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220502111003.32397-3-ramalingam.c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220502111003.32397-1-ramalingam.c@intel.com>

From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

In order to keep the context image parser simple, we assume that all
commands follow a similar format. A few, especially not MI commands on
the render engines, have fixed lengths not encoded in a length field.
This caused us to incorrectly skip over 3D state commands, and start
interpreting context data as instructions. Eventually, as Daniele
discovered, this would lead us to find addition LRI as part of the data
and mistakenly add invalid LRI commands to the context probes.

Stop parsing after we see the first !MI command, as we know we will have
seen all the context registers by that point. (Mostly true for all gen
so far, though the render context does have LRI after the first page
that we have been ignoring so far. It would be useful to extract those
as well so that we have the full list of user accessible registers.)

Similarly, emit a warning if we do try to emit an invalid zero-length
LRI.

Reported-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
index c4bd4e1ac5ef..3271f01fe7db 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
 #define NUM_GPR 16
 #define NUM_GPR_DW (NUM_GPR * 2) /* each GPR is 2 dwords */
 
+#define LRI_HEADER MI_INSTR(0x22, 0)
+#define LRI_LENGTH_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
+
 static struct i915_vma *create_scratch(struct intel_gt *gt)
 {
 	return __vm_create_scratch_for_read_pinned(&gt->ggtt->vm, PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -202,7 +205,7 @@ static int live_lrc_layout(void *arg)
 				continue;
 			}
 
-			if ((lri & GENMASK(31, 23)) != MI_INSTR(0x22, 0)) {
+			if ((lri & GENMASK(31, 23)) != LRI_HEADER) {
 				pr_err("%s: Expected LRI command at dword %d, found %08x\n",
 				       engine->name, dw, lri);
 				err = -EINVAL;
@@ -992,18 +995,40 @@ store_context(struct intel_context *ce, struct i915_vma *scratch)
 	hw = defaults;
 	hw += LRC_STATE_OFFSET / sizeof(*hw);
 	do {
-		u32 len = hw[dw] & 0x7f;
+		u32 len = hw[dw] & LRI_LENGTH_MASK;
+
+		/*
+		 * Keep it simple, skip parsing complex commands
+		 *
+		 * At present, there are no more MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM
+		 * commands after the first 3D state command. Rather
+		 * than include a table (see i915_cmd_parser.c) of all
+		 * the possible commands and their instruction lengths
+		 * (or mask for variable length instructions), assume
+		 * we have gathered the complete list of registers and
+		 * bail out.
+		 */
+		if ((hw[dw] >> INSTR_CLIENT_SHIFT) != INSTR_MI_CLIENT)
+			break;
 
 		if (hw[dw] == 0) {
 			dw++;
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		if ((hw[dw] & GENMASK(31, 23)) != MI_INSTR(0x22, 0)) {
+		if ((hw[dw] & GENMASK(31, 23)) != LRI_HEADER) {
+			/* Assume all other MI commands match LRI length mask */
 			dw += len + 2;
 			continue;
 		}
 
+		if (!len) {
+			pr_err("%s: invalid LRI found in context image\n",
+			       ce->engine->name);
+			igt_hexdump(defaults, PAGE_SIZE);
+			break;
+		}
+
 		dw++;
 		len = (len + 1) / 2;
 		while (len--) {
@@ -1155,18 +1180,29 @@ static struct i915_vma *load_context(struct intel_context *ce, u32 poison)
 	hw = defaults;
 	hw += LRC_STATE_OFFSET / sizeof(*hw);
 	do {
-		u32 len = hw[dw] & 0x7f;
+		u32 len = hw[dw] & LRI_LENGTH_MASK;
+
+		/* For simplicity, break parsing at the first complex command */
+		if ((hw[dw] >> INSTR_CLIENT_SHIFT) != INSTR_MI_CLIENT)
+			break;
 
 		if (hw[dw] == 0) {
 			dw++;
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		if ((hw[dw] & GENMASK(31, 23)) != MI_INSTR(0x22, 0)) {
+		if ((hw[dw] & GENMASK(31, 23)) != LRI_HEADER) {
 			dw += len + 2;
 			continue;
 		}
 
+		if (!len) {
+			pr_err("%s: invalid LRI found in context image\n",
+			       ce->engine->name);
+			igt_hexdump(defaults, PAGE_SIZE);
+			break;
+		}
+
 		dw++;
 		len = (len + 1) / 2;
 		*cs++ = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(len);
@@ -1297,18 +1333,29 @@ static int compare_isolation(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 	hw = defaults;
 	hw += LRC_STATE_OFFSET / sizeof(*hw);
 	do {
-		u32 len = hw[dw] & 0x7f;
+		u32 len = hw[dw] & LRI_LENGTH_MASK;
+
+		/* For simplicity, break parsing at the first complex command */
+		if ((hw[dw] >> INSTR_CLIENT_SHIFT) != INSTR_MI_CLIENT)
+			break;
 
 		if (hw[dw] == 0) {
 			dw++;
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		if ((hw[dw] & GENMASK(31, 23)) != MI_INSTR(0x22, 0)) {
+		if ((hw[dw] & GENMASK(31, 23)) != LRI_HEADER) {
 			dw += len + 2;
 			continue;
 		}
 
+		if (!len) {
+			pr_err("%s: invalid LRI found in context image\n",
+			       engine->name);
+			igt_hexdump(defaults, PAGE_SIZE);
+			break;
+		}
+
 		dw++;
 		len = (len + 1) / 2;
 		while (len--) {
-- 
2.20.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	Hellstrom Thomas <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/i915/selftests: Check for incomplete LRI from the context image
Date: Mon,  2 May 2022 16:40:01 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220502111003.32397-3-ramalingam.c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220502111003.32397-1-ramalingam.c@intel.com>

From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

In order to keep the context image parser simple, we assume that all
commands follow a similar format. A few, especially not MI commands on
the render engines, have fixed lengths not encoded in a length field.
This caused us to incorrectly skip over 3D state commands, and start
interpreting context data as instructions. Eventually, as Daniele
discovered, this would lead us to find addition LRI as part of the data
and mistakenly add invalid LRI commands to the context probes.

Stop parsing after we see the first !MI command, as we know we will have
seen all the context registers by that point. (Mostly true for all gen
so far, though the render context does have LRI after the first page
that we have been ignoring so far. It would be useful to extract those
as well so that we have the full list of user accessible registers.)

Similarly, emit a warning if we do try to emit an invalid zero-length
LRI.

Reported-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
index c4bd4e1ac5ef..3271f01fe7db 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
 #define NUM_GPR 16
 #define NUM_GPR_DW (NUM_GPR * 2) /* each GPR is 2 dwords */
 
+#define LRI_HEADER MI_INSTR(0x22, 0)
+#define LRI_LENGTH_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
+
 static struct i915_vma *create_scratch(struct intel_gt *gt)
 {
 	return __vm_create_scratch_for_read_pinned(&gt->ggtt->vm, PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -202,7 +205,7 @@ static int live_lrc_layout(void *arg)
 				continue;
 			}
 
-			if ((lri & GENMASK(31, 23)) != MI_INSTR(0x22, 0)) {
+			if ((lri & GENMASK(31, 23)) != LRI_HEADER) {
 				pr_err("%s: Expected LRI command at dword %d, found %08x\n",
 				       engine->name, dw, lri);
 				err = -EINVAL;
@@ -992,18 +995,40 @@ store_context(struct intel_context *ce, struct i915_vma *scratch)
 	hw = defaults;
 	hw += LRC_STATE_OFFSET / sizeof(*hw);
 	do {
-		u32 len = hw[dw] & 0x7f;
+		u32 len = hw[dw] & LRI_LENGTH_MASK;
+
+		/*
+		 * Keep it simple, skip parsing complex commands
+		 *
+		 * At present, there are no more MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM
+		 * commands after the first 3D state command. Rather
+		 * than include a table (see i915_cmd_parser.c) of all
+		 * the possible commands and their instruction lengths
+		 * (or mask for variable length instructions), assume
+		 * we have gathered the complete list of registers and
+		 * bail out.
+		 */
+		if ((hw[dw] >> INSTR_CLIENT_SHIFT) != INSTR_MI_CLIENT)
+			break;
 
 		if (hw[dw] == 0) {
 			dw++;
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		if ((hw[dw] & GENMASK(31, 23)) != MI_INSTR(0x22, 0)) {
+		if ((hw[dw] & GENMASK(31, 23)) != LRI_HEADER) {
+			/* Assume all other MI commands match LRI length mask */
 			dw += len + 2;
 			continue;
 		}
 
+		if (!len) {
+			pr_err("%s: invalid LRI found in context image\n",
+			       ce->engine->name);
+			igt_hexdump(defaults, PAGE_SIZE);
+			break;
+		}
+
 		dw++;
 		len = (len + 1) / 2;
 		while (len--) {
@@ -1155,18 +1180,29 @@ static struct i915_vma *load_context(struct intel_context *ce, u32 poison)
 	hw = defaults;
 	hw += LRC_STATE_OFFSET / sizeof(*hw);
 	do {
-		u32 len = hw[dw] & 0x7f;
+		u32 len = hw[dw] & LRI_LENGTH_MASK;
+
+		/* For simplicity, break parsing at the first complex command */
+		if ((hw[dw] >> INSTR_CLIENT_SHIFT) != INSTR_MI_CLIENT)
+			break;
 
 		if (hw[dw] == 0) {
 			dw++;
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		if ((hw[dw] & GENMASK(31, 23)) != MI_INSTR(0x22, 0)) {
+		if ((hw[dw] & GENMASK(31, 23)) != LRI_HEADER) {
 			dw += len + 2;
 			continue;
 		}
 
+		if (!len) {
+			pr_err("%s: invalid LRI found in context image\n",
+			       ce->engine->name);
+			igt_hexdump(defaults, PAGE_SIZE);
+			break;
+		}
+
 		dw++;
 		len = (len + 1) / 2;
 		*cs++ = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(len);
@@ -1297,18 +1333,29 @@ static int compare_isolation(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 	hw = defaults;
 	hw += LRC_STATE_OFFSET / sizeof(*hw);
 	do {
-		u32 len = hw[dw] & 0x7f;
+		u32 len = hw[dw] & LRI_LENGTH_MASK;
+
+		/* For simplicity, break parsing at the first complex command */
+		if ((hw[dw] >> INSTR_CLIENT_SHIFT) != INSTR_MI_CLIENT)
+			break;
 
 		if (hw[dw] == 0) {
 			dw++;
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		if ((hw[dw] & GENMASK(31, 23)) != MI_INSTR(0x22, 0)) {
+		if ((hw[dw] & GENMASK(31, 23)) != LRI_HEADER) {
 			dw += len + 2;
 			continue;
 		}
 
+		if (!len) {
+			pr_err("%s: invalid LRI found in context image\n",
+			       engine->name);
+			igt_hexdump(defaults, PAGE_SIZE);
+			break;
+		}
+
 		dw++;
 		len = (len + 1) / 2;
 		while (len--) {
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-02 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-02 11:09 [PATCH v4 0/4] lrc selftest fixes Ramalingam C
2022-05-02 11:09 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2022-05-02 11:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] drm/i915/gt: Explicitly clear BB_OFFSET for new contexts Ramalingam C
2022-05-02 11:10   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2022-05-02 12:41   ` Ramalingam C
2022-05-02 12:41     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2022-05-02 11:10 ` Ramalingam C [this message]
2022-05-02 11:10   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/i915/selftests: Check for incomplete LRI from the context image Ramalingam C
2022-05-02 11:10 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/i915/selftest: Always cancel semaphore on error Ramalingam C
2022-05-02 11:10   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2022-05-02 11:10 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] drm/i915/selftest: Clear the output buffers before GPU writes Ramalingam C
2022-05-02 11:10   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2022-05-02 11:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for lrc selftest fixes (rev6) Patchwork
2022-05-02 12:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-05-02 15:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220502111003.32397-3-ramalingam.c@intel.com \
    --to=ramalingam.c@intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.