All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] fbdev: efifb: Cleanup fb_info in .fb_destroy rather than .remove
Date: Thu,  5 May 2022 13:31:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220505113128.264963-4-javierm@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505113128.264963-1-javierm@redhat.com>

The driver is calling framebuffer_release() in its .remove callback, but
this will cause the struct fb_info to be freed too early. Since it could
be that a reference is still hold to it if user-space opened the fbdev.

This would lead to a use-after-free error if the framebuffer device was
unregistered but later a user-space process tries to close the fbdev fd.

The correct thing to do is to only unregister the framebuffer in the
driver's .remove callback, but do any cleanup in the fb_ops.fb_destroy.

Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
---

(no changes since v1)

 drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
index ea42ba6445b2..cfa3dc0b4eee 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
@@ -243,6 +243,10 @@ static void efifb_show_boot_graphics(struct fb_info *info)
 static inline void efifb_show_boot_graphics(struct fb_info *info) {}
 #endif
 
+/*
+ * fb_ops.fb_destroy is called by the last put_fb_info() call at the end
+ * of unregister_framebuffer() or fb_release(). Do any cleanup here.
+ */
 static void efifb_destroy(struct fb_info *info)
 {
 	if (efifb_pci_dev)
@@ -254,6 +258,9 @@ static void efifb_destroy(struct fb_info *info)
 		else
 			memunmap(info->screen_base);
 	}
+
+	framebuffer_release(info);
+
 	if (request_mem_succeeded)
 		release_mem_region(info->apertures->ranges[0].base,
 				   info->apertures->ranges[0].size);
@@ -620,9 +627,9 @@ static int efifb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct fb_info *info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
+	/* efifb_destroy takes care of info cleanup */
 	unregister_framebuffer(info);
 	sysfs_remove_groups(&pdev->dev.kobj, efifb_groups);
-	framebuffer_release(info);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.35.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] fbdev: efifb: Cleanup fb_info in .fb_destroy rather than .remove
Date: Thu,  5 May 2022 13:31:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220505113128.264963-4-javierm@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505113128.264963-1-javierm@redhat.com>

The driver is calling framebuffer_release() in its .remove callback, but
this will cause the struct fb_info to be freed too early. Since it could
be that a reference is still hold to it if user-space opened the fbdev.

This would lead to a use-after-free error if the framebuffer device was
unregistered but later a user-space process tries to close the fbdev fd.

The correct thing to do is to only unregister the framebuffer in the
driver's .remove callback, but do any cleanup in the fb_ops.fb_destroy.

Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
---

(no changes since v1)

 drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
index ea42ba6445b2..cfa3dc0b4eee 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
@@ -243,6 +243,10 @@ static void efifb_show_boot_graphics(struct fb_info *info)
 static inline void efifb_show_boot_graphics(struct fb_info *info) {}
 #endif
 
+/*
+ * fb_ops.fb_destroy is called by the last put_fb_info() call at the end
+ * of unregister_framebuffer() or fb_release(). Do any cleanup here.
+ */
 static void efifb_destroy(struct fb_info *info)
 {
 	if (efifb_pci_dev)
@@ -254,6 +258,9 @@ static void efifb_destroy(struct fb_info *info)
 		else
 			memunmap(info->screen_base);
 	}
+
+	framebuffer_release(info);
+
 	if (request_mem_succeeded)
 		release_mem_region(info->apertures->ranges[0].base,
 				   info->apertures->ranges[0].size);
@@ -620,9 +627,9 @@ static int efifb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct fb_info *info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
+	/* efifb_destroy takes care of info cleanup */
 	unregister_framebuffer(info);
 	sysfs_remove_groups(&pdev->dev.kobj, efifb_groups);
-	framebuffer_release(info);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-05 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-05 11:31 [PATCH v2 0/4] fbdev: Fix use-after-free caused by wrong fb_info cleanup in drivers Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-05 11:31 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-05 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] fbdev: Prevent possible use-after-free in fb_release() Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-05 11:31   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-05 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] fbdev: simplefb: Cleanup fb_info in .fb_destroy rather than .remove Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-05 11:31   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-05 11:31 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2022-05-05 11:31   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] fbdev: efifb: " Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-05 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] fbdev: vesafb: " Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-05 11:31   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-05 11:51   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-05 11:51     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-05 13:02   ` Daniel Vetter
2022-05-05 13:02     ` Daniel Vetter
2022-05-05 13:19     ` Javier Martinez Canillas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220505113128.264963-4-javierm@redhat.com \
    --to=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.