All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/i915/psr: Use full update In case of area calculation fails
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 15:30:26 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220513123027.655313-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220513123027.655313-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com>

Currently we have some corner cases where area calculation fails.  For
these sel fetch area calculation ends up having update area as y1 = 0,
y2 = 4. Instead of these values safer option is full update.

One of such for example is big fb with offset. We don't have usable
offset in psr2_sel_fetch_update. Currently it's open what is the
proper way to fix this corner case. Use full update for now.

v2: Commit message modified
v3: Print out debug info once when area calculation fails
v4: Use drm_info_once

Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
index 06db407e2749..1f031ebc1456 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
@@ -1685,6 +1685,7 @@ static bool psr2_sel_fetch_pipe_state_supported(const struct intel_crtc_state *c
 int intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 				struct intel_crtc *crtc)
 {
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
 	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state = intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
 	struct drm_rect pipe_clip = { .x1 = 0, .y1 = -1, .x2 = INT_MAX, .y2 = -1 };
 	struct intel_plane_state *new_plane_state, *old_plane_state;
@@ -1770,6 +1771,17 @@ int intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 		clip_area_update(&pipe_clip, &damaged_area);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * TODO: For now we are just using full update in case
+	 * selective fetch area calculation fails. To optimize this we
+	 * should identify cases where this happens and fix the area
+	 * calculation for those.
+	 */
+	if (pipe_clip.y1 == -1) {
+		drm_info_once(&dev_priv->drm, "Selective fetch area calculation failed in pipeA");
+		full_update = true;
+	}
+
 	if (full_update)
 		goto skip_sel_fetch_set_loop;
 
-- 
2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-13 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-13 12:30 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/2] Fixes for selective fetch area calculation Jouni Högander
2022-05-13 12:30 ` Jouni Högander [this message]
2022-05-13 13:01   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/i915/psr: Use full update In case of area calculation fails Souza, Jose
2022-05-13 12:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/i915: Ensure damage clip area is within pipe area Jouni Högander
2022-05-13 13:02   ` Souza, Jose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220513123027.655313-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.