[PULL 08/22] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: report correct PRIbits field in ICV_CTLR_EL1

[Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>]

As noted in the comment, the PRIbits field in ICV_CTLR_EL1 is
supposed to match the ICH_VTR_EL2 PRIbits setting; that is, it is the
virtual priority bit setting, not the physical priority bit setting.
(For QEMU currently we always implement 8 bits of physical priority,
so the PRIbits field was previously 7, since it is defined to be
"priority bits - 1".)

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220512151457.3899052-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Message-id: 20220506162129.2896966-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
---
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
index df2f8583564..ebf269b73a4 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
@@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ static uint64_t icv_ctlr_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
      * should match the ones reported in ich_vtr_read().
      */
     value = ICC_CTLR_EL1_A3V | (1 << ICC_CTLR_EL1_IDBITS_SHIFT) |
-        (7 << ICC_CTLR_EL1_PRIBITS_SHIFT);
+        ((cs->vpribits - 1) << ICC_CTLR_EL1_PRIBITS_SHIFT);
 
     if (cs->ich_vmcr_el2 & ICH_VMCR_EL2_VEOIM) {
         value |= ICC_CTLR_EL1_EOIMODE;
-- 
2.25.1