All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
	shakeelb@google.com
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
	longman@redhat.com, Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 11/11] mm: lru: use lruvec lock to serialize memcg changes
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 14:05:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220524060551.80037-12-songmuchun@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220524060551.80037-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>

As described by commit fc574c23558c ("mm/swap.c: serialize memcg
changes in pagevec_lru_move_fn"), TestClearPageLRU() aims to
serialize mem_cgroup_move_account() during pagevec_lru_move_fn().
Now folio_lruvec_lock*() has the ability to detect whether page
memcg has been changed. So we can use lruvec lock to serialize
mem_cgroup_move_account() during pagevec_lru_move_fn(). This
change is a partial revert of the commit fc574c23558c ("mm/swap.c:
serialize memcg changes in pagevec_lru_move_fn").

And pagevec_lru_move_fn() is more hot compare with
mem_cgroup_move_account(), removing an atomic operation would be
an optimization. Also this change would not dirty cacheline for a
page which isn't on the LRU.

Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/swap.c       | 45 ++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 mm/vmscan.c     |  9 ++++-----
 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 1a35f7fde3ed..7b6d9c308d91 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1331,12 +1331,38 @@ struct lruvec *folio_lruvec_lock(struct folio *folio)
 	lruvec = folio_lruvec(folio);
 	spin_lock(&lruvec->lru_lock);
 
+	/*
+	 * The memcg of the page can be changed by any the following routines:
+	 *
+	 * 1) mem_cgroup_move_account() or
+	 * 2) memcg_reparent_objcgs()
+	 *
+	 * The possible bad scenario would like:
+	 *
+	 * CPU0:                CPU1:                CPU2:
+	 * lruvec = folio_lruvec()
+	 *
+	 *                      if (!isolate_lru_page())
+	 *                              mem_cgroup_move_account()
+	 *
+	 *                                           memcg_reparent_objcgs()
+	 *
+	 * spin_lock(&lruvec->lru_lock)
+	 *                ^^^^^^
+	 *              wrong lock
+	 *
+	 * Either CPU1 or CPU2 can change page memcg, so we need to check
+	 * whether page memcg is changed, if so, we should reacquire the
+	 * new lruvec lock.
+	 */
 	if (unlikely(lruvec_memcg(lruvec) != folio_memcg(folio))) {
 		spin_unlock(&lruvec->lru_lock);
 		goto retry;
 	}
 
 	/*
+	 * When we reach here, it means that the folio_memcg(folio) is stable.
+	 *
 	 * Preemption is disabled in the internal of spin_lock, which can serve
 	 * as RCU read-side critical sections.
 	 */
@@ -1367,6 +1393,7 @@ struct lruvec *folio_lruvec_lock_irq(struct folio *folio)
 	lruvec = folio_lruvec(folio);
 	spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
 
+	/* See the comments in folio_lruvec_lock(). */
 	if (unlikely(lruvec_memcg(lruvec) != folio_memcg(folio))) {
 		spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
 		goto retry;
@@ -1402,6 +1429,7 @@ struct lruvec *folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave(struct folio *folio,
 	lruvec = folio_lruvec(folio);
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, *flags);
 
+	/* See the comments in folio_lruvec_lock(). */
 	if (unlikely(lruvec_memcg(lruvec) != folio_memcg(folio))) {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lruvec->lru_lock, *flags);
 		goto retry;
@@ -5751,7 +5779,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page *page,
 	obj_cgroup_put(rcu_dereference(from->objcg));
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
+	/* See the comments in folio_lruvec_lock(). */
+	spin_lock(&from_vec->lru_lock);
 	folio->memcg_data = (unsigned long)rcu_access_pointer(to->objcg);
+	spin_unlock(&from_vec->lru_lock);
 
 	__folio_memcg_unlock(from);
 
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 9680f2fc48b1..984b100e84e4 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -199,14 +199,8 @@ static void pagevec_lru_move_fn(struct pagevec *pvec,
 		struct page *page = pvec->pages[i];
 		struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
 
-		/* block memcg migration during page moving between lru */
-		if (!TestClearPageLRU(page))
-			continue;
-
 		lruvec = folio_lruvec_relock_irqsave(folio, lruvec, &flags);
 		(*move_fn)(page, lruvec);
-
-		SetPageLRU(page);
 	}
 	if (lruvec)
 		unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
@@ -218,7 +212,7 @@ static void pagevec_move_tail_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
 {
 	struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
 
-	if (!folio_test_unevictable(folio)) {
+	if (folio_test_lru(folio) && !folio_test_unevictable(folio)) {
 		lruvec_del_folio(lruvec, folio);
 		folio_clear_active(folio);
 		lruvec_add_folio_tail(lruvec, folio);
@@ -313,7 +307,8 @@ void lru_note_cost_folio(struct folio *folio)
 
 static void __folio_activate(struct folio *folio, struct lruvec *lruvec)
 {
-	if (!folio_test_active(folio) && !folio_test_unevictable(folio)) {
+	if (folio_test_lru(folio) && !folio_test_active(folio) &&
+	    !folio_test_unevictable(folio)) {
 		long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
 
 		lruvec_del_folio(lruvec, folio);
@@ -370,12 +365,9 @@ static void folio_activate(struct folio *folio)
 {
 	struct lruvec *lruvec;
 
-	if (folio_test_clear_lru(folio)) {
-		lruvec = folio_lruvec_lock_irq(folio);
-		__folio_activate(folio, lruvec);
-		unlock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
-		folio_set_lru(folio);
-	}
+	lruvec = folio_lruvec_lock_irq(folio);
+	__folio_activate(folio, lruvec);
+	unlock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -518,6 +510,9 @@ static void lru_deactivate_file_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
 	bool active = PageActive(page);
 	int nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
 
+	if (!PageLRU(page))
+		return;
+
 	if (PageUnevictable(page))
 		return;
 
@@ -555,7 +550,7 @@ static void lru_deactivate_file_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
 
 static void lru_deactivate_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
 {
-	if (PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
+	if (PageLRU(page) && PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
 		int nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
 
 		del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec);
@@ -571,7 +566,7 @@ static void lru_deactivate_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
 
 static void lru_lazyfree_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
 {
-	if (PageAnon(page) && PageSwapBacked(page) &&
+	if (PageLRU(page) && PageAnon(page) && PageSwapBacked(page) &&
 	    !PageSwapCache(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
 		int nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
 
@@ -1006,8 +1001,9 @@ void __pagevec_release(struct pagevec *pvec)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__pagevec_release);
 
-static void __pagevec_lru_add_fn(struct folio *folio, struct lruvec *lruvec)
+static void __pagevec_lru_add_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
 {
+	struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
 	int was_unevictable = folio_test_clear_unevictable(folio);
 	long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
 
@@ -1053,20 +1049,7 @@ static void __pagevec_lru_add_fn(struct folio *folio, struct lruvec *lruvec)
  */
 void __pagevec_lru_add(struct pagevec *pvec)
 {
-	int i;
-	struct lruvec *lruvec = NULL;
-	unsigned long flags = 0;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(pvec); i++) {
-		struct folio *folio = page_folio(pvec->pages[i]);
-
-		lruvec = folio_lruvec_relock_irqsave(folio, lruvec, &flags);
-		__pagevec_lru_add_fn(folio, lruvec);
-	}
-	if (lruvec)
-		unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
-	release_pages(pvec->pages, pvec->nr);
-	pagevec_reinit(pvec);
+	pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, __pagevec_lru_add_fn);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 6c9e2eafc8f9..ec1272ca5ead 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -4793,18 +4793,17 @@ void check_move_unevictable_pages(struct pagevec *pvec)
 		nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
 		pgscanned += nr_pages;
 
-		/* block memcg migration during page moving between lru */
-		if (!TestClearPageLRU(page))
+		lruvec = folio_lruvec_relock_irq(folio, lruvec);
+
+		if (!PageLRU(page) || !PageUnevictable(page))
 			continue;
 
-		lruvec = folio_lruvec_relock_irq(folio, lruvec);
-		if (page_evictable(page) && PageUnevictable(page)) {
+		if (page_evictable(page)) {
 			del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec);
 			ClearPageUnevictable(page);
 			add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec);
 			pgrescued += nr_pages;
 		}
-		SetPageLRU(page);
 	}
 
 	if (lruvec) {
-- 
2.11.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
To: hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org,
	mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	roman.gushchin-fxUVXftIFDnyG1zEObXtfA@public.gmane.org,
	shakeelb-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	duanxiongchun-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org,
	longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 11/11] mm: lru: use lruvec lock to serialize memcg changes
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 14:05:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220524060551.80037-12-songmuchun@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220524060551.80037-1-songmuchun-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>

As described by commit fc574c23558c ("mm/swap.c: serialize memcg
changes in pagevec_lru_move_fn"), TestClearPageLRU() aims to
serialize mem_cgroup_move_account() during pagevec_lru_move_fn().
Now folio_lruvec_lock*() has the ability to detect whether page
memcg has been changed. So we can use lruvec lock to serialize
mem_cgroup_move_account() during pagevec_lru_move_fn(). This
change is a partial revert of the commit fc574c23558c ("mm/swap.c:
serialize memcg changes in pagevec_lru_move_fn").

And pagevec_lru_move_fn() is more hot compare with
mem_cgroup_move_account(), removing an atomic operation would be
an optimization. Also this change would not dirty cacheline for a
page which isn't on the LRU.

Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/swap.c       | 45 ++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 mm/vmscan.c     |  9 ++++-----
 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 1a35f7fde3ed..7b6d9c308d91 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1331,12 +1331,38 @@ struct lruvec *folio_lruvec_lock(struct folio *folio)
 	lruvec = folio_lruvec(folio);
 	spin_lock(&lruvec->lru_lock);
 
+	/*
+	 * The memcg of the page can be changed by any the following routines:
+	 *
+	 * 1) mem_cgroup_move_account() or
+	 * 2) memcg_reparent_objcgs()
+	 *
+	 * The possible bad scenario would like:
+	 *
+	 * CPU0:                CPU1:                CPU2:
+	 * lruvec = folio_lruvec()
+	 *
+	 *                      if (!isolate_lru_page())
+	 *                              mem_cgroup_move_account()
+	 *
+	 *                                           memcg_reparent_objcgs()
+	 *
+	 * spin_lock(&lruvec->lru_lock)
+	 *                ^^^^^^
+	 *              wrong lock
+	 *
+	 * Either CPU1 or CPU2 can change page memcg, so we need to check
+	 * whether page memcg is changed, if so, we should reacquire the
+	 * new lruvec lock.
+	 */
 	if (unlikely(lruvec_memcg(lruvec) != folio_memcg(folio))) {
 		spin_unlock(&lruvec->lru_lock);
 		goto retry;
 	}
 
 	/*
+	 * When we reach here, it means that the folio_memcg(folio) is stable.
+	 *
 	 * Preemption is disabled in the internal of spin_lock, which can serve
 	 * as RCU read-side critical sections.
 	 */
@@ -1367,6 +1393,7 @@ struct lruvec *folio_lruvec_lock_irq(struct folio *folio)
 	lruvec = folio_lruvec(folio);
 	spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
 
+	/* See the comments in folio_lruvec_lock(). */
 	if (unlikely(lruvec_memcg(lruvec) != folio_memcg(folio))) {
 		spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
 		goto retry;
@@ -1402,6 +1429,7 @@ struct lruvec *folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave(struct folio *folio,
 	lruvec = folio_lruvec(folio);
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, *flags);
 
+	/* See the comments in folio_lruvec_lock(). */
 	if (unlikely(lruvec_memcg(lruvec) != folio_memcg(folio))) {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lruvec->lru_lock, *flags);
 		goto retry;
@@ -5751,7 +5779,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page *page,
 	obj_cgroup_put(rcu_dereference(from->objcg));
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
+	/* See the comments in folio_lruvec_lock(). */
+	spin_lock(&from_vec->lru_lock);
 	folio->memcg_data = (unsigned long)rcu_access_pointer(to->objcg);
+	spin_unlock(&from_vec->lru_lock);
 
 	__folio_memcg_unlock(from);
 
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 9680f2fc48b1..984b100e84e4 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -199,14 +199,8 @@ static void pagevec_lru_move_fn(struct pagevec *pvec,
 		struct page *page = pvec->pages[i];
 		struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
 
-		/* block memcg migration during page moving between lru */
-		if (!TestClearPageLRU(page))
-			continue;
-
 		lruvec = folio_lruvec_relock_irqsave(folio, lruvec, &flags);
 		(*move_fn)(page, lruvec);
-
-		SetPageLRU(page);
 	}
 	if (lruvec)
 		unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
@@ -218,7 +212,7 @@ static void pagevec_move_tail_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
 {
 	struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
 
-	if (!folio_test_unevictable(folio)) {
+	if (folio_test_lru(folio) && !folio_test_unevictable(folio)) {
 		lruvec_del_folio(lruvec, folio);
 		folio_clear_active(folio);
 		lruvec_add_folio_tail(lruvec, folio);
@@ -313,7 +307,8 @@ void lru_note_cost_folio(struct folio *folio)
 
 static void __folio_activate(struct folio *folio, struct lruvec *lruvec)
 {
-	if (!folio_test_active(folio) && !folio_test_unevictable(folio)) {
+	if (folio_test_lru(folio) && !folio_test_active(folio) &&
+	    !folio_test_unevictable(folio)) {
 		long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
 
 		lruvec_del_folio(lruvec, folio);
@@ -370,12 +365,9 @@ static void folio_activate(struct folio *folio)
 {
 	struct lruvec *lruvec;
 
-	if (folio_test_clear_lru(folio)) {
-		lruvec = folio_lruvec_lock_irq(folio);
-		__folio_activate(folio, lruvec);
-		unlock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
-		folio_set_lru(folio);
-	}
+	lruvec = folio_lruvec_lock_irq(folio);
+	__folio_activate(folio, lruvec);
+	unlock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -518,6 +510,9 @@ static void lru_deactivate_file_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
 	bool active = PageActive(page);
 	int nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
 
+	if (!PageLRU(page))
+		return;
+
 	if (PageUnevictable(page))
 		return;
 
@@ -555,7 +550,7 @@ static void lru_deactivate_file_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
 
 static void lru_deactivate_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
 {
-	if (PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
+	if (PageLRU(page) && PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
 		int nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
 
 		del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec);
@@ -571,7 +566,7 @@ static void lru_deactivate_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
 
 static void lru_lazyfree_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
 {
-	if (PageAnon(page) && PageSwapBacked(page) &&
+	if (PageLRU(page) && PageAnon(page) && PageSwapBacked(page) &&
 	    !PageSwapCache(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
 		int nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
 
@@ -1006,8 +1001,9 @@ void __pagevec_release(struct pagevec *pvec)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__pagevec_release);
 
-static void __pagevec_lru_add_fn(struct folio *folio, struct lruvec *lruvec)
+static void __pagevec_lru_add_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
 {
+	struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
 	int was_unevictable = folio_test_clear_unevictable(folio);
 	long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
 
@@ -1053,20 +1049,7 @@ static void __pagevec_lru_add_fn(struct folio *folio, struct lruvec *lruvec)
  */
 void __pagevec_lru_add(struct pagevec *pvec)
 {
-	int i;
-	struct lruvec *lruvec = NULL;
-	unsigned long flags = 0;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(pvec); i++) {
-		struct folio *folio = page_folio(pvec->pages[i]);
-
-		lruvec = folio_lruvec_relock_irqsave(folio, lruvec, &flags);
-		__pagevec_lru_add_fn(folio, lruvec);
-	}
-	if (lruvec)
-		unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
-	release_pages(pvec->pages, pvec->nr);
-	pagevec_reinit(pvec);
+	pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, __pagevec_lru_add_fn);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 6c9e2eafc8f9..ec1272ca5ead 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -4793,18 +4793,17 @@ void check_move_unevictable_pages(struct pagevec *pvec)
 		nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
 		pgscanned += nr_pages;
 
-		/* block memcg migration during page moving between lru */
-		if (!TestClearPageLRU(page))
+		lruvec = folio_lruvec_relock_irq(folio, lruvec);
+
+		if (!PageLRU(page) || !PageUnevictable(page))
 			continue;
 
-		lruvec = folio_lruvec_relock_irq(folio, lruvec);
-		if (page_evictable(page) && PageUnevictable(page)) {
+		if (page_evictable(page)) {
 			del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec);
 			ClearPageUnevictable(page);
 			add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec);
 			pgrescued += nr_pages;
 		}
-		SetPageLRU(page);
 	}
 
 	if (lruvec) {
-- 
2.11.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-24  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-24  6:05 [PATCH v4 00/11] Use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] mm: memcontrol: prepare objcg API for non-kmem usage Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:01   ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-24 19:01     ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25  8:46     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  8:46       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  2:36   ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25  2:36     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25  7:57     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  7:57       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 12:37       ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 12:37         ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 13:08         ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 13:08           ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] mm: memcontrol: introduce compact_folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:22   ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-24 19:22     ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25  9:38     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  9:38       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] mm: memcontrol: make lruvec lock safe when LRU pages are reparented Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:23   ` Waiman Long
2022-05-25 10:20     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 10:20       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 14:59       ` Waiman Long
2022-05-25 14:59         ` Waiman Long
2022-05-24 19:27   ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-24 19:27     ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25  9:53     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  9:53       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 12:30       ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 12:30         ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 13:03         ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 13:03           ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 14:48           ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 14:48             ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 15:38             ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 15:38               ` Muchun Song
2022-05-26 20:17               ` Waiman Long
2022-05-26 20:17                 ` Waiman Long
2022-05-27  2:55                 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-27  2:55                   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] mm: vmscan: rework move_pages_to_lru() Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:38   ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-24 19:38     ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 11:38     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 11:38       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:52   ` Waiman Long
2022-05-24 19:52     ` Waiman Long
2022-05-25 11:43     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 11:43       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  2:43   ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25  2:43     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25 11:41     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 11:41       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] mm: thp: introduce folio_split_queue_lock{_irqsave}() Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] mm: thp: make split queue lock safe when LRU pages are reparented Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  2:54   ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25  2:54     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25 11:44     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 11:44       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] mm: memcontrol: make all the callers of {folio,page}_memcg() safe Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  3:03   ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25  3:03     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25 11:51     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 11:51       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] mm: memcontrol: introduce memcg_reparent_ops Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] mm: memcontrol: use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 12:29   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-24 18:16   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-24 18:16     ` kernel test robot
2022-05-25  7:14   ` [mm] bec0ae1210: WARNING:possible_recursive_locking_detected kernel test robot
2022-05-25  7:14     ` kernel test robot
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] mm: lru: add VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO to lru maintenance function Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:44   ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-24 19:44     ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 11:59     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 11:59       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  2:40   ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25  2:40     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25 11:58     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2022-05-24  6:05   ` [PATCH v4 11/11] mm: lru: use lruvec lock to serialize memcg changes Muchun Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220524060551.80037-12-songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --to=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.