All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH] hwmon: sht15: Fix wrong assumptions in device remove callback
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 21:43:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220725194344.150098-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> (raw)

Taking a lock at the beginning of .remove() doesn't prevent new readers.
With the existing approach it can happen, that a read occurs just when
the lock was taken blocking the reader until the lock is released at the
end of the remove callback which then accessed *data that is already
freed then.

To actually fix this problem the hwmon core needs some adaption. Until
this is implemented take the optimistic approach of assuming that all
readers are gone after hwmon_device_unregister() and
sysfs_remove_group() as most other drivers do. (And once the core
implements that, taking the lock would deadlock.)

So drop the lock, move the reset to after device unregistration to keep
the device in a workable state until it's deregistered. Also add a error
message in case the reset fails and return 0 anyhow. (Returning an error
code, doesn't stop the platform device unregistration and only results
in a little helpful error message before the devm cleanup handlers are
called.)

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
Hello,

the motivation for this patch is to fix the driver to not return an
error code in .remove(). The long term goal is to make remove callbacks
return void as returning an error is nearly always wrong and doesn't
have the effect that driver authors think it has. This patch is a
preparation for this conversion.

Best regards
Uwe

 drivers/hwmon/sht15.c | 17 ++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/sht15.c b/drivers/hwmon/sht15.c
index 7f4a63959730..ae4d14257a11 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/sht15.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/sht15.c
@@ -1020,25 +1020,20 @@ static int sht15_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static int sht15_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct sht15_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	int ret;
 
-	/*
-	 * Make sure any reads from the device are done and
-	 * prevent new ones beginning
-	 */
-	mutex_lock(&data->read_lock);
-	if (sht15_soft_reset(data)) {
-		mutex_unlock(&data->read_lock);
-		return -EFAULT;
-	}
 	hwmon_device_unregister(data->hwmon_dev);
 	sysfs_remove_group(&pdev->dev.kobj, &sht15_attr_group);
+
+	ret = sht15_soft_reset(data);
+	if (ret)
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to reset device (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
+
 	if (!IS_ERR(data->reg)) {
 		regulator_unregister_notifier(data->reg, &data->nb);
 		regulator_disable(data->reg);
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&data->read_lock);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.36.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-07-25 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-25 19:43 Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2022-07-26 14:02 ` [PATCH] hwmon: sht15: Fix wrong assumptions in device remove callback Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220725194344.150098-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.