From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> To: <soc@kernel.org>, Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com> Cc: "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>, "Wolfram Sang" <wsa@kernel.org>, "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>, "Jassi Brar" <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>, "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, "Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Olof Johansson" <olof@lixom.net>, "Michael Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>, "Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, "Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Subject: [RESEND/PULL PATCH 0/2] MAINTAINERS updates for PolarFire SoC Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:02:42 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220810140243.2685416-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com> (raw) Hey Arnd, Could you please take the following two patches via the soc tree when you get a chance? The first is adding coverage for "my" dt-bindings as suggested by Mark. I CCed all the subsystem maintainers on a V1 a week ago & I've added them explicity to the patch text this time as CCs. Correct me if I am wrong, but I am operating on the assumption that their Acks are not required here. Hopefully increasing the binding coverage is non controversial! The second patch is a resend of a patch that was deferred to later in the merge window avoid messing about with a 4th conflict in the entry. Thanks, Conor. Conor Dooley (2): MAINTAINERS: add PolarFire SoC dt bindings MAINTAINERS: add the Polarfire SoC's i2c driver MAINTAINERS | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) base-commit: 4e23eeebb2e57f5a28b36221aa776b5a1122dde5 -- 2.36.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> To: <soc@kernel.org>, Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com> Cc: "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>, "Wolfram Sang" <wsa@kernel.org>, "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>, "Jassi Brar" <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>, "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, "Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Olof Johansson" <olof@lixom.net>, "Michael Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>, "Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, "Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Subject: [RESEND/PULL PATCH 0/2] MAINTAINERS updates for PolarFire SoC Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:02:42 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220810140243.2685416-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com> (raw) Hey Arnd, Could you please take the following two patches via the soc tree when you get a chance? The first is adding coverage for "my" dt-bindings as suggested by Mark. I CCed all the subsystem maintainers on a V1 a week ago & I've added them explicity to the patch text this time as CCs. Correct me if I am wrong, but I am operating on the assumption that their Acks are not required here. Hopefully increasing the binding coverage is non controversial! The second patch is a resend of a patch that was deferred to later in the merge window avoid messing about with a 4th conflict in the entry. Thanks, Conor. Conor Dooley (2): MAINTAINERS: add PolarFire SoC dt bindings MAINTAINERS: add the Polarfire SoC's i2c driver MAINTAINERS | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) base-commit: 4e23eeebb2e57f5a28b36221aa776b5a1122dde5 -- 2.36.1 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next reply other threads:[~2022-08-10 14:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-08-10 14:02 Conor Dooley [this message] 2022-08-10 14:02 ` [RESEND/PULL PATCH 0/2] MAINTAINERS updates for PolarFire SoC Conor Dooley 2022-08-10 14:02 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: add PolarFire SoC dt bindings Conor Dooley 2022-08-10 14:02 ` Conor Dooley 2022-08-10 17:11 ` Uwe Kleine-König 2022-08-10 17:11 ` Uwe Kleine-König 2022-08-26 0:15 ` Palmer Dabbelt 2022-08-26 0:15 ` Palmer Dabbelt 2022-08-10 14:02 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: add the Polarfire SoC's i2c driver Conor Dooley 2022-08-10 14:02 ` Conor Dooley 2022-08-10 20:20 ` [RESEND/PULL PATCH 0/2] MAINTAINERS updates for PolarFire SoC patchwork-bot+linux-soc 2022-08-26 0:15 ` Palmer Dabbelt 2022-08-26 0:15 ` Palmer Dabbelt 2022-08-26 6:22 ` Conor.Dooley 2022-08-26 6:22 ` Conor.Dooley 2022-08-26 14:33 ` Palmer Dabbelt 2022-08-26 14:33 ` Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220810140243.2685416-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com \ --to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \ --cc=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=daire.mcnamara@microchip.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \ --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \ --cc=olof@lixom.net \ --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \ --cc=soc@kernel.org \ --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \ --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \ --cc=wsa@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.