From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com Subject: [PATCH 2/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Improve checks on .info_get operations Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 18:27:27 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220817172731.1185305-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220817172731.1185305-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> SCMI protocols abstract and expose a number of protocol specific resources like clocks, sensors and so on: information about such specific domain resources are generally exposed via an .info_get protocol operation. Improve the sanity check on these .info_get operations where needed. Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 6 +++++- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c | 3 +++ include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c index 3ed7ae0d6781..96060bf90a24 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c @@ -450,9 +450,13 @@ static int scmi_clock_count_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph) static const struct scmi_clock_info * scmi_clock_info_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id) { + struct scmi_clock_info *clk; struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph); - struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id; + if (clk_id >= ci->num_clocks) + return NULL; + + clk = ci->clk + clk_id; if (!clk->name[0]) return NULL; diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c index 7288c6117838..7d0c7476d206 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c @@ -948,6 +948,9 @@ scmi_sensor_info_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 sensor_id) { struct sensors_info *si = ph->get_priv(ph); + if (sensor_id >= si->num_sensors) + return NULL; + return si->sensors + sensor_id; } diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h index a193884ecf2b..4f765bc788ff 100644 --- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h +++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ struct scmi_protocol_handle; struct scmi_clk_proto_ops { int (*count_get)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph); - const struct scmi_clock_info *(*info_get) + const struct scmi_clock_info __must_check *(*info_get) (const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id); int (*rate_get)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id, u64 *rate); @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ enum scmi_sensor_class { */ struct scmi_sensor_proto_ops { int (*count_get)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph); - const struct scmi_sensor_info *(*info_get) + const struct scmi_sensor_info __must_check *(*info_get) (const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 sensor_id); int (*trip_point_config)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 sensor_id, u8 trip_id, u64 trip_value); -- 2.32.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com Subject: [PATCH 2/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Improve checks on .info_get operations Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 18:27:27 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220817172731.1185305-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220817172731.1185305-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> SCMI protocols abstract and expose a number of protocol specific resources like clocks, sensors and so on: information about such specific domain resources are generally exposed via an .info_get protocol operation. Improve the sanity check on these .info_get operations where needed. Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 6 +++++- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c | 3 +++ include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c index 3ed7ae0d6781..96060bf90a24 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c @@ -450,9 +450,13 @@ static int scmi_clock_count_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph) static const struct scmi_clock_info * scmi_clock_info_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id) { + struct scmi_clock_info *clk; struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph); - struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id; + if (clk_id >= ci->num_clocks) + return NULL; + + clk = ci->clk + clk_id; if (!clk->name[0]) return NULL; diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c index 7288c6117838..7d0c7476d206 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c @@ -948,6 +948,9 @@ scmi_sensor_info_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 sensor_id) { struct sensors_info *si = ph->get_priv(ph); + if (sensor_id >= si->num_sensors) + return NULL; + return si->sensors + sensor_id; } diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h index a193884ecf2b..4f765bc788ff 100644 --- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h +++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ struct scmi_protocol_handle; struct scmi_clk_proto_ops { int (*count_get)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph); - const struct scmi_clock_info *(*info_get) + const struct scmi_clock_info __must_check *(*info_get) (const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id); int (*rate_get)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id, u64 *rate); @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ enum scmi_sensor_class { */ struct scmi_sensor_proto_ops { int (*count_get)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph); - const struct scmi_sensor_info *(*info_get) + const struct scmi_sensor_info __must_check *(*info_get) (const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 sensor_id); int (*trip_point_config)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 sensor_id, u8 trip_id, u64 trip_value); -- 2.32.0 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-17 17:28 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-08-17 17:27 [PATCH 0/6] Misc fixes for v5.20 Cristian Marussi 2022-08-17 17:27 ` Cristian Marussi 2022-08-17 17:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix missing kernel-doc in optee Cristian Marussi 2022-08-17 17:27 ` Cristian Marussi 2022-08-17 17:27 ` Cristian Marussi [this message] 2022-08-17 17:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Improve checks on .info_get operations Cristian Marussi 2022-08-17 17:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Harden accesses to Sensor domains Cristian Marussi 2022-08-17 17:27 ` Cristian Marussi 2022-08-17 17:27 ` [PATCH 4/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Harden accesses to Reset domains Cristian Marussi 2022-08-17 17:27 ` Cristian Marussi 2022-08-17 17:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix asynchronous reset requests Cristian Marussi 2022-08-17 17:27 ` Cristian Marussi 2022-08-17 17:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] [RFC] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI PM driver remove routine Cristian Marussi 2022-08-17 17:27 ` Cristian Marussi 2022-08-31 13:25 ` [PATCH 0/6] Misc fixes for v5.20 Sudeep Holla 2022-08-31 13:25 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220817172731.1185305-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com \ --to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.