From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>
To: <tj@kernel.org>, <axboe@kernel.dk>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <shikemeng@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] blk-iocost: Reset vtime_base_rate in ioc_refresh_params
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 10:00:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221017020011.25016-3-shikemeng@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221017020011.25016-1-shikemeng@huawei.com>
Since commit ac33e91e2daca("blk-iocost: implement vtime loss compensation")
split vtime_rate into vtime_rate and vtime_base_rate, we need reset both
vtime_base_rate and vtime_rate when device parameters are refreshed.
If vtime_base_rate is no reset here, vtime_rate will be overwritten with
old vtime_base_rate soon in ioc_refresh_vrate.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>
---
block/blk-iocost.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
index be4bc38821e2..9214733bbc14 100644
--- a/block/blk-iocost.c
+++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
@@ -906,8 +906,10 @@ static bool ioc_refresh_params(struct ioc *ioc, bool force)
if (idx == ioc->autop_idx && !force)
return false;
- if (idx != ioc->autop_idx)
+ if (idx != ioc->autop_idx) {
atomic64_set(&ioc->vtime_rate, VTIME_PER_USEC);
+ ioc->vtime_base_rate = VTIME_PER_USEC;
+ }
ioc->autop_idx = idx;
ioc->autop_too_fast_at = 0;
--
2.30.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-17 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-17 2:00 [PATCH 0/8] A few cleanup and bugfix patches for blk-iocost Kemeng Shi
2022-10-17 2:00 ` [PATCH 1/8] blk-iocost: Fix typo in comment Kemeng Shi
2022-10-17 18:52 ` Tejun Heo
2022-10-17 2:00 ` Kemeng Shi [this message]
2022-10-17 18:59 ` [PATCH 2/8] blk-iocost: Reset vtime_base_rate in ioc_refresh_params Tejun Heo
2022-10-17 2:00 ` [PATCH 3/8] blk-iocost: Trace vtime_base_rate instead of vtime_rate Kemeng Shi
2022-10-17 19:03 ` Tejun Heo
2022-10-17 2:00 ` [PATCH 4/8] blk-iocost: Remove vrate member in struct ioc_now Kemeng Shi
2022-10-17 19:08 ` Tejun Heo
2022-10-17 2:00 ` [PATCH 5/8] blk-iocost: Correct comment in blk_iocost_init Kemeng Shi
2022-10-17 19:10 ` Tejun Heo
2022-10-17 2:00 ` [PATCH 6/8] blk-iocost: Avoid to call current_hweight_max if iocg->inuse == iocg->active Kemeng Shi
2022-10-17 19:15 ` Tejun Heo
2022-10-17 2:00 ` [PATCH 7/8] blk-iocost: Remove redundant initialization of struct ioc_gq Kemeng Shi
2022-10-17 19:16 ` Tejun Heo
2022-10-17 2:00 ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-iocost: Get ioc_now inside weight_updated Kemeng Shi
2022-10-17 19:19 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221017020011.25016-3-shikemeng@huawei.com \
--to=shikemeng@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.