All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ye Bin <yebin@huaweicloud.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yebin@huaweicloud.com,
	Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] blktrace: fix possible memleak in '__blk_trace_remove'
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 11:36:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221019033602.752383-3-yebin@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221019033602.752383-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com>

From: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>

When test as follows:
step1: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACESETUP, &arg)
step2: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACESTART, NULL)
step3: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACETEARDOWN, NULL)
step4: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACESETUP, &arg)
Got issue as follows:
debugfs: File 'dropped' in directory 'sda' already present!
debugfs: File 'msg' in directory 'sda' already present!
debugfs: File 'trace0' in directory 'sda' already present!

And also find syzkaller report issue like "KASAN: use-after-free Read in relay_switch_subbuf"
"https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=13849f0d9b1b818b087341691be6cc3ac6a6bfb7"

If remove block trace without stop(BLKTRACESTOP) block trace, '__blk_trace_remove'
will just set 'q->blk_trace' with NULL. However, debugfs file isn't removed, so
will report file already present when call BLKTRACESETUP.
static int __blk_trace_remove(struct request_queue *q)
{
        struct blk_trace *bt;

        bt = rcu_replace_pointer(q->blk_trace, NULL,
                                 lockdep_is_held(&q->debugfs_mutex));
        if (!bt)
                return -EINVAL;

	if (bt->trace_state != Blktrace_running)
        	blk_trace_cleanup(q, bt);

        return 0;
}

If do test as follows:
step1: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACESETUP, &arg)
step2: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACESTART, NULL)
step3: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACETEARDOWN, NULL)
step4: remove sda

There will remove debugfs directory which will remove recursively all file
under directory.
>> blk_release_queue
>>	debugfs_remove_recursive(q->debugfs_dir)
So all files which created in 'do_blk_trace_setup' are removed, and
'dentry->d_inode' is NULL. But 'q->blk_trace' is still in 'running_trace_lock',
'trace_note_tsk' will traverse 'running_trace_lock' all nodes.
>>trace_note_tsk
>>  trace_note
>>    relay_reserve
>>       relay_switch_subbuf
>>        d_inode(buf->dentry)->i_size

To solve above issues, reference commit '5afedf670caf', call 'blk_trace_cleanup'
unconditionally in '__blk_trace_remove' and first stop block trace in
'blk_trace_cleanup'.

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
index 50b6f241b5f7..e17bba027a2c 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
@@ -379,6 +379,7 @@ static int blk_trace_stop(struct blk_trace *bt)
 
 static void blk_trace_cleanup(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_trace *bt)
 {
+	blk_trace_stop(bt);
 	synchronize_rcu();
 	blk_trace_free(q, bt);
 	put_probe_ref();
@@ -393,8 +394,7 @@ static int __blk_trace_remove(struct request_queue *q)
 	if (!bt)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (bt->trace_state != Blktrace_running)
-		blk_trace_cleanup(q, bt);
+	blk_trace_cleanup(q, bt);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-19  3:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-19  3:35 [PATCH v3 0/3] fix possible memleak in '__blk_trace_remove' Ye Bin
2022-10-19  3:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] blktrace: introduce 'blk_trace_{start,stop}' helper Ye Bin
2022-10-20  8:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-19  3:36 ` Ye Bin [this message]
2022-10-20  8:04   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] blktrace: fix possible memleak in '__blk_trace_remove' Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-19  3:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] blktrace: remove unnessary stop block trace in 'blk_trace_shutdown' Ye Bin
2022-10-20  8:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-20 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] fix possible memleak in '__blk_trace_remove' Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221019033602.752383-3-yebin@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=yebin@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=yebin10@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.