All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
To: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] smp: reword smp call IPI comment
Date: Wed,  2 Nov 2022 18:33:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221102183336.3120536-6-vschneid@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221102182949.3119584-1-vschneid@redhat.com>

Accessing the call_single_queue hasn't involved a spinlock since 2014:

  6897fc22ea01 ("kernel: use lockless list for smp_call_function_single")

The llist operations (namely cmpxchg() and xchg()) provide similar ordering
guarantees, update the comment to lessen confusion.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/smp.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 44fa4b9b1f46b..b96579fe08f09 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -503,9 +503,10 @@ void __smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, struct llist_node *node)
 #endif
 
 	/*
-	 * The list addition should be visible before sending the IPI
-	 * handler locks the list to pull the entry off it because of
-	 * normal cache coherency rules implied by spinlocks.
+	 * The list addition should be visible to the target CPU when it pops
+	 * the head of the list to pull the entry off it in the IPI handler
+	 * because of normal cache coherency rules implied by the underlying
+	 * llist ops.
 	 *
 	 * If IPIs can go out of order to the cache coherency protocol
 	 * in an architecture, sufficient synchronisation should be added
-- 
2.31.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
To: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] smp: reword smp call IPI comment
Date: Wed,  2 Nov 2022 18:33:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221102183336.3120536-6-vschneid@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221102182949.3119584-1-vschneid@redhat.com>

Accessing the call_single_queue hasn't involved a spinlock since 2014:

  6897fc22ea01 ("kernel: use lockless list for smp_call_function_single")

The llist operations (namely cmpxchg() and xchg()) provide similar ordering
guarantees, update the comment to lessen confusion.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/smp.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 44fa4b9b1f46b..b96579fe08f09 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -503,9 +503,10 @@ void __smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, struct llist_node *node)
 #endif
 
 	/*
-	 * The list addition should be visible before sending the IPI
-	 * handler locks the list to pull the entry off it because of
-	 * normal cache coherency rules implied by spinlocks.
+	 * The list addition should be visible to the target CPU when it pops
+	 * the head of the list to pull the entry off it in the IPI handler
+	 * because of normal cache coherency rules implied by the underlying
+	 * llist ops.
 	 *
 	 * If IPIs can go out of order to the cache coherency protocol
 	 * in an architecture, sufficient synchronisation should be added
-- 
2.31.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
To: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] smp: reword smp call IPI comment
Date: Wed,  2 Nov 2022 18:33:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221102183336.3120536-6-vschneid@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221102182949.3119584-1-vschneid@redhat.com>

Accessing the call_single_queue hasn't involved a spinlock since 2014:

  6897fc22ea01 ("kernel: use lockless list for smp_call_function_single")

The llist operations (namely cmpxchg() and xchg()) provide similar ordering
guarantees, update the comment to lessen confusion.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/smp.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 44fa4b9b1f46b..b96579fe08f09 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -503,9 +503,10 @@ void __smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, struct llist_node *node)
 #endif
 
 	/*
-	 * The list addition should be visible before sending the IPI
-	 * handler locks the list to pull the entry off it because of
-	 * normal cache coherency rules implied by spinlocks.
+	 * The list addition should be visible to the target CPU when it pops
+	 * the head of the list to pull the entry off it in the IPI handler
+	 * because of normal cache coherency rules implied by the underlying
+	 * llist ops.
 	 *
 	 * If IPIs can go out of order to the cache coherency protocol
 	 * in an architecture, sufficient synchronisation should be added
-- 
2.31.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
To: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] smp: reword smp call IPI comment
Date: Wed,  2 Nov 2022 18:33:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221102183336.3120536-6-vschneid@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221102182949.3119584-1-vschneid@redhat.com>

Accessing the call_single_queue hasn't involved a spinlock since 2014:

  6897fc22ea01 ("kernel: use lockless list for smp_call_function_single")

The llist operations (namely cmpxchg() and xchg()) provide similar ordering
guarantees, update the comment to lessen confusion.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/smp.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 44fa4b9b1f46b..b96579fe08f09 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -503,9 +503,10 @@ void __smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, struct llist_node *node)
 #endif
 
 	/*
-	 * The list addition should be visible before sending the IPI
-	 * handler locks the list to pull the entry off it because of
-	 * normal cache coherency rules implied by spinlocks.
+	 * The list addition should be visible to the target CPU when it pops
+	 * the head of the list to pull the entry off it in the IPI handler
+	 * because of normal cache coherency rules implied by the underlying
+	 * llist ops.
 	 *
 	 * If IPIs can go out of order to the cache coherency protocol
 	 * in an architecture, sufficient synchronisation should be added
-- 
2.31.1


_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
To: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] smp: reword smp call IPI comment
Date: Wed,  2 Nov 2022 18:33:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221102183336.3120536-6-vschneid@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221102182949.3119584-1-vschneid@redhat.com>

Accessing the call_single_queue hasn't involved a spinlock since 2014:

  6897fc22ea01 ("kernel: use lockless list for smp_call_function_single")

The llist operations (namely cmpxchg() and xchg()) provide similar ordering
guarantees, update the comment to lessen confusion.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/smp.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 44fa4b9b1f46b..b96579fe08f09 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -503,9 +503,10 @@ void __smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, struct llist_node *node)
 #endif
 
 	/*
-	 * The list addition should be visible before sending the IPI
-	 * handler locks the list to pull the entry off it because of
-	 * normal cache coherency rules implied by spinlocks.
+	 * The list addition should be visible to the target CPU when it pops
+	 * the head of the list to pull the entry off it in the IPI handler
+	 * because of normal cache coherency rules implied by the underlying
+	 * llist ops.
 	 *
 	 * If IPIs can go out of order to the cache coherency protocol
 	 * in an architecture, sufficient synchronisation should be added
-- 
2.31.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
To: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] smp: reword smp call IPI comment
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 18:33:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221102183336.3120536-6-vschneid@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221102182949.3119584-1-vschneid@redhat.com>

Accessing the call_single_queue hasn't involved a spinlock since 2014:

  6897fc22ea01 ("kernel: use lockless list for smp_call_function_single")

The llist operations (namely cmpxchg() and xchg()) provide similar ordering
guarantees, update the comment to lessen confusion.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/smp.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 44fa4b9b1f46b..b96579fe08f09 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -503,9 +503,10 @@ void __smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, struct llist_node *node)
 #endif
 
 	/*
-	 * The list addition should be visible before sending the IPI
-	 * handler locks the list to pull the entry off it because of
-	 * normal cache coherency rules implied by spinlocks.
+	 * The list addition should be visible to the target CPU when it pops
+	 * the head of the list to pull the entry off it in the IPI handler
+	 * because of normal cache coherency rules implied by the underlying
+	 * llist ops.
 	 *
 	 * If IPIs can go out of order to the cache coherency protocol
 	 * in an architecture, sufficient synchronisation should be added
-- 
2.31.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-02 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 131+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-02 18:29 [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Generic IPI sending tracepoint Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:29 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:29 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:29 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:29 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:29 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] DO-NOT-MERGE: tracing: Add __cpumask to denote a trace event field that is a cpumask_t Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:29   ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] DO-NOT-MERGE: tracing: Add __cpumask to denote a trace event field that is a cpum Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:29   ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] DO-NOT-MERGE: tracing: Add __cpumask to denote a trace event field that is a cpumask_t Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:29   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:29   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:29   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] trace: Add trace_ipi_send_cpumask() Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] sched, smp: Trace IPIs sent via send_call_function_single_ipi() Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] smp: Trace IPIs sent via arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask() Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17  9:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17 14:23     ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:23       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:23       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:23       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:23       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:23       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:23       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] irq_work: Trace self-IPIs sent via arch_irq_work_raise() Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17  9:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-02 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] treewide: Trace IPIs sent via smp_send_reschedule() Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17  9:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17  9:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17 14:24     ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:24       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:24       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:24       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:24       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:24       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2022-11-02 18:33   ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] smp: reword smp call IPI comment Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] sched, smp: Trace smp callback causing an IPI Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17 14:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17 14:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17 14:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17 14:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17 14:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17 14:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17 14:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17 14:45     ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:45       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:45       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:45       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:45       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:45       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:45       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:45       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-18  9:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-18  9:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-18  9:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-18  9:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-18  9:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-18  9:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-18  9:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-18  9:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-18 16:42         ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2022-11-18 16:42           ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2022-11-18 16:42           ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2022-11-18 16:42           ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2022-11-18 16:42           ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2022-11-18 16:42           ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2022-11-18 16:42           ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2022-11-18 16:42           ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2022-11-14 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Generic IPI sending tracepoint Steven Rostedt
2022-11-14 17:27   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-11-14 17:27   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-11-14 17:27   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-11-14 17:27   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-11-14 17:27   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-11-14 17:27   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-11-14 17:27   ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221102183336.3120536-6-vschneid@redhat.com \
    --to=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.