From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>
To: <paolo.valente@linaro.org>, <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<shikemeng@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] block, bfq: remove unsed parameter reason in bfq_bfqq_is_slow
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 12:52:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221108045224.19092-3-shikemeng@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221108045224.19092-1-shikemeng@huawei.com>
Parameter reason is never used, just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index b0bee8ab65e6..fc71181a7e5d 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -4132,8 +4132,7 @@ static void __bfq_bfqq_recalc_budget(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
* function to evaluate the I/O speed of a process.
*/
static bool bfq_bfqq_is_slow(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
- bool compensate, enum bfqq_expiration reason,
- unsigned long *delta_ms)
+ bool compensate, unsigned long *delta_ms)
{
ktime_t delta_ktime;
u32 delta_usecs;
@@ -4329,7 +4328,7 @@ void bfq_bfqq_expire(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
/*
* Check whether the process is slow (see bfq_bfqq_is_slow).
*/
- slow = bfq_bfqq_is_slow(bfqd, bfqq, compensate, reason, &delta);
+ slow = bfq_bfqq_is_slow(bfqd, bfqq, compensate, &delta);
/*
* As above explained, charge slow (typically seeky) and
--
2.30.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-08 4:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-08 4:52 [PATCH 00/10] A few bugfix and cleancode patch for bfq Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 01/10] block, bfq: correctly raise inject limit in bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` Kemeng Shi [this message]
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 03/10] block, bfq: initialize bfqq->decrease_time_jif correctly Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 04/10] block, bfq: use helper macro RQ_BFQQ to get bfqq of request Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 05/10] block, bfq: remove unnecessary pointer reference to get async_bfqq Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 06/10] block, bfq: remove redundant bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0 check in bfq_add_request Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 07/10] block, bfq: remove redundant check in bfq_put_cooperator Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 08/10] block, bfq: remove unnecessary goto tag in bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 09/10] block, bfq: remove unused bfq_wr_max_time in struct bfq_data Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 10/10] block, bfq: remove check of bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate which is always greater than 0 Kemeng Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221108045224.19092-3-shikemeng@huawei.com \
--to=shikemeng@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.