All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
To: brendanhiggins@google.com, davidgow@google.com, dlatypov@google.com
Cc: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, isabbasso@riseup.net,
	anders.roxell@linaro.org, Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] kunit: tool: parse KTAP compliant test output
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 18:47:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221121184743.1123556-1-rmoar@google.com> (raw)

Change the KUnit parser to be able to parse test output that complies with
the KTAP version 1 specification format found here:
https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/ktap.html. Ensure the parser
is able to parse tests with the original KUnit test output format as
well.

KUnit parser now accepts any of the following test output formats:

Original KUnit test output format:

 TAP version 14
 1..1
   # Subtest: kunit-test-suite
   1..3
   ok 1 - kunit_test_1
   ok 2 - kunit_test_2
   ok 3 - kunit_test_3
 # kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
 # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
 ok 1 - kunit-test-suite

KTAP version 1 test output format:

 KTAP version 1
 1..1
   KTAP version 1
   1..3
   ok 1 kunit_test_1
   ok 2 kunit_test_2
   ok 3 kunit_test_3
 ok 1 kunit-test-suite

New KUnit test output format (changes made in the next patch of
this series):

 KTAP version 1
 1..1
   KTAP version 1
   # Subtest: kunit-test-suite
   1..3
   ok 1 kunit_test_1
   ok 2 kunit_test_2
   ok 3 kunit_test_3
 # kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
 # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
 ok 1 kunit-test-suite

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---

Changes since v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221104194705.3245738-2-rmoar@google.com/
- Switch order of patches to make changes to the parser before making
  changes to the test output
- Change placeholder label for test header from “Test suite” to empty
  string
- Change parser to approve the new KTAP version line in the subtest header
  to be before the subtest header line rather than after.
- Note: Considered changing parser to allow for the top-level of testing
  to have a '# Subtest' line as discussed in v1 but this breaks the
  missing test plan test. So I think it would be best to add this ability
  at a later time or after top-level test name and result lines are
  discussed for KTAP v2.

tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py           | 79 ++++++++++++-------
 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py        |  8 ++
 .../test_data/test_parse_ktap_output.log      |  8 ++
 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_ktap_output.log

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
index a56c75a973b5..ed752d53d6a8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
@@ -441,6 +441,7 @@ def parse_diagnostic(lines: LineStream) -> List[str]:
 	- '# Subtest: [test name]'
 	- '[ok|not ok] [test number] [-] [test name] [optional skip
 		directive]'
+	- 'KTAP version [version number]'
 
 	Parameters:
 	lines - LineStream of KTAP output to parse
@@ -449,8 +450,9 @@ def parse_diagnostic(lines: LineStream) -> List[str]:
 	Log of diagnostic lines
 	"""
 	log = []  # type: List[str]
-	while lines and not TEST_RESULT.match(lines.peek()) and not \
-			TEST_HEADER.match(lines.peek()):
+	non_diagnostic_lines = [TEST_RESULT, TEST_HEADER, KTAP_START]
+	while lines and not any(re.match(lines.peek())
+			for re in non_diagnostic_lines):
 		log.append(lines.pop())
 	return log
 
@@ -496,11 +498,15 @@ def print_test_header(test: Test) -> None:
 	test - Test object representing current test being printed
 	"""
 	message = test.name
+	if message != "":
+		# Add a leading space before the subtest counts only if a test name
+		# is provided using a "# Subtest" header line.
+		message += " "
 	if test.expected_count:
 		if test.expected_count == 1:
-			message += ' (1 subtest)'
+			message += '(1 subtest)'
 		else:
-			message += f' ({test.expected_count} subtests)'
+			message += f'({test.expected_count} subtests)'
 	stdout.print_with_timestamp(format_test_divider(message, len(message)))
 
 def print_log(log: Iterable[str]) -> None:
@@ -647,7 +653,7 @@ def bubble_up_test_results(test: Test) -> None:
 	elif test.counts.get_status() == TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED:
 		test.status = TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED
 
-def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
+def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str], is_subtest: bool) -> Test:
 	"""
 	Finds next test to parse in LineStream, creates new Test object,
 	parses any subtests of the test, populates Test object with all
@@ -665,15 +671,32 @@ def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
 	1..4
 	[subtests]
 
-	- Subtest header line
+	- Subtest header (must include either the KTAP version line or
+	  "# Subtest" header line)
 
-	Example:
+	Example (preferred format with both KTAP version line and
+	"# Subtest" line):
+
+	KTAP version 1
+	# Subtest: name
+	1..3
+	[subtests]
+	ok 1 name
+
+	Example (only "# Subtest" line):
 
 	# Subtest: name
 	1..3
 	[subtests]
 	ok 1 name
 
+	Example (only KTAP version line, compliant with KTAP v1 spec):
+
+	KTAP version 1
+	1..3
+	[subtests]
+	ok 1 name
+
 	- Test result line
 
 	Example:
@@ -685,28 +708,29 @@ def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
 	expected_num - expected test number for test to be parsed
 	log - list of strings containing any preceding diagnostic lines
 		corresponding to the current test
+	is_subtest - boolean indicating whether test is a subtest
 
 	Return:
 	Test object populated with characteristics and any subtests
 	"""
 	test = Test()
 	test.log.extend(log)
-	parent_test = False
-	main = parse_ktap_header(lines, test)
-	if main:
-		# If KTAP/TAP header is found, attempt to parse
+	if not is_subtest:
+		# If parsing the main/top-level test, parse KTAP version line and
 		# test plan
 		test.name = "main"
+		ktap_line = parse_ktap_header(lines, test)
 		parse_test_plan(lines, test)
 		parent_test = True
 	else:
-		# If KTAP/TAP header is not found, test must be subtest
-		# header or test result line so parse attempt to parser
-		# subtest header
-		parent_test = parse_test_header(lines, test)
+		# If not the main test, attempt to parse a test header contatining
+		# the KTAP version line and/or subtest header line
+		ktap_line = parse_ktap_header(lines, test)
+		subtest_line = parse_test_header(lines, test)
+		parent_test = (ktap_line or subtest_line)
 		if parent_test:
-			# If subtest header is found, attempt to parse
-			# test plan and print header
+			# If KTAP version line and/or subtest header is found, attempt
+			# to parse test plan and print test header
 			parse_test_plan(lines, test)
 			print_test_header(test)
 	expected_count = test.expected_count
@@ -721,7 +745,7 @@ def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
 		sub_log = parse_diagnostic(lines)
 		sub_test = Test()
 		if not lines or (peek_test_name_match(lines, test) and
-				not main):
+				is_subtest):
 			if expected_count and test_num <= expected_count:
 				# If parser reaches end of test before
 				# parsing expected number of subtests, print
@@ -735,20 +759,19 @@ def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
 				test.log.extend(sub_log)
 				break
 		else:
-			sub_test = parse_test(lines, test_num, sub_log)
+			sub_test = parse_test(lines, test_num, sub_log, True)
 		subtests.append(sub_test)
 		test_num += 1
 	test.subtests = subtests
-	if not main:
+	if is_subtest:
 		# If not main test, look for test result line
 		test.log.extend(parse_diagnostic(lines))
-		if (parent_test and peek_test_name_match(lines, test)) or \
-				not parent_test:
-			parse_test_result(lines, test, expected_num)
-		else:
+		if test.name != "" and not peek_test_name_match(lines, test):
 			test.add_error('missing subtest result line!')
+		else:
+			parse_test_result(lines, test, expected_num)
 
-	# Check for there being no tests
+	# Check for there being no subtests within parent test
 	if parent_test and len(subtests) == 0:
 		# Don't override a bad status if this test had one reported.
 		# Assumption: no subtests means CRASHED is from Test.__init__()
@@ -758,11 +781,11 @@ def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
 
 	# Add statuses to TestCounts attribute in Test object
 	bubble_up_test_results(test)
-	if parent_test and not main:
+	if parent_test and is_subtest:
 		# If test has subtests and is not the main test object, print
 		# footer.
 		print_test_footer(test)
-	elif not main:
+	elif is_subtest:
 		print_test_result(test)
 	return test
 
@@ -785,7 +808,7 @@ def parse_run_tests(kernel_output: Iterable[str]) -> Test:
 		test.add_error('could not find any KTAP output!')
 		test.status = TestStatus.FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS
 	else:
-		test = parse_test(lines, 0, [])
+		test = parse_test(lines, 0, [], False)
 		if test.status != TestStatus.NO_TESTS:
 			test.status = test.counts.get_status()
 	stdout.print_with_timestamp(DIVIDER)
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
index 90c65b072be9..7c2e2a45f330 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
@@ -312,6 +312,14 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
 		self.assertEqual(kunit_parser._summarize_failed_tests(result),
 			'Failures: all_failed_suite, some_failed_suite.test2')
 
+	def test_ktap_format(self):
+		ktap_log = test_data_path('test_parse_ktap_output.log')
+		with open(ktap_log) as file:
+			result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())
+		self.assertEqual(result.counts, kunit_parser.TestCounts(passed=3))
+		self.assertEqual('suite', result.subtests[0].name)
+		self.assertEqual('case_1', result.subtests[0].subtests[0].name)
+		self.assertEqual('case_2', result.subtests[0].subtests[1].name)
 
 def line_stream_from_strs(strs: Iterable[str]) -> kunit_parser.LineStream:
 	return kunit_parser.LineStream(enumerate(strs, start=1))
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_ktap_output.log b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_ktap_output.log
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ccdf244e5303
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_ktap_output.log
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+KTAP version 1
+1..1
+  KTAP version 1
+  1..3
+  ok 1 case_1
+  ok 2 case_2
+  ok 3 case_3
+ok 1 suite

base-commit: 6fe1ad4a156095859721fef85073df3ed43081d4
-- 
2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2022-11-21 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-21 18:47 Rae Moar [this message]
2022-11-21 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kunit: improve KTAP compliance of KUnit test output Rae Moar
2022-11-21 20:32   ` Daniel Latypov
2022-11-22  9:17   ` Anders Roxell
2022-11-22 17:14     ` Daniel Latypov
2022-11-22 20:19       ` Rae Moar
2022-11-21 20:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] kunit: tool: parse KTAP compliant " Daniel Latypov
2022-11-22 22:06   ` Rae Moar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221121184743.1123556-1-rmoar@google.com \
    --to=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=isabbasso@riseup.net \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.