From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915/mtl: Hold forcewake and MCR lock over PPAT setup Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 07:58:52 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20221130155852.19601-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <Y4d76483JRj5d4RL@bala-ubuntu> PPAT setup involves a series of multicast writes. This can be optimized slightly be acquiring forcewake and the steering lock just once for the entire sequence. v2: - We should use FW_REG_WRITE instead of FW_REG_READ. (Bala) Suggested-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c index 2ba3983984b9..e37164a60d37 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c @@ -482,14 +482,25 @@ static void tgl_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_uncore *uncore) static void xehp_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_gt *gt) { - intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(0), GEN8_PPAT_WB); - intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(1), GEN8_PPAT_WC); - intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(2), GEN8_PPAT_WT); - intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(3), GEN8_PPAT_UC); - intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(4), GEN8_PPAT_WB); - intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(5), GEN8_PPAT_WB); - intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(6), GEN8_PPAT_WB); - intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(7), GEN8_PPAT_WB); + enum forcewake_domains fw; + unsigned long flags; + + fw = intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(gt->uncore, _MMIO(XEHP_PAT_INDEX(0).reg), + FW_REG_WRITE); + intel_uncore_forcewake_get(gt->uncore, fw); + + intel_gt_mcr_lock(gt, &flags); + intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write_fw(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(0), GEN8_PPAT_WB); + intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write_fw(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(1), GEN8_PPAT_WC); + intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write_fw(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(2), GEN8_PPAT_WT); + intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write_fw(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(3), GEN8_PPAT_UC); + intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write_fw(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(4), GEN8_PPAT_WB); + intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write_fw(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(5), GEN8_PPAT_WB); + intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write_fw(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(6), GEN8_PPAT_WB); + intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write_fw(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(7), GEN8_PPAT_WB); + intel_gt_mcr_unlock(gt, flags); + + intel_uncore_forcewake_put(gt->uncore, fw); } static void icl_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_uncore *uncore) -- 2.38.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915/mtl: Hold forcewake and MCR lock over PPAT setup Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 07:58:52 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20221130155852.19601-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <Y4d76483JRj5d4RL@bala-ubuntu> PPAT setup involves a series of multicast writes. This can be optimized slightly be acquiring forcewake and the steering lock just once for the entire sequence. v2: - We should use FW_REG_WRITE instead of FW_REG_READ. (Bala) Suggested-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c index 2ba3983984b9..e37164a60d37 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c @@ -482,14 +482,25 @@ static void tgl_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_uncore *uncore) static void xehp_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_gt *gt) { - intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(0), GEN8_PPAT_WB); - intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(1), GEN8_PPAT_WC); - intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(2), GEN8_PPAT_WT); - intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(3), GEN8_PPAT_UC); - intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(4), GEN8_PPAT_WB); - intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(5), GEN8_PPAT_WB); - intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(6), GEN8_PPAT_WB); - intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(7), GEN8_PPAT_WB); + enum forcewake_domains fw; + unsigned long flags; + + fw = intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(gt->uncore, _MMIO(XEHP_PAT_INDEX(0).reg), + FW_REG_WRITE); + intel_uncore_forcewake_get(gt->uncore, fw); + + intel_gt_mcr_lock(gt, &flags); + intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write_fw(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(0), GEN8_PPAT_WB); + intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write_fw(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(1), GEN8_PPAT_WC); + intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write_fw(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(2), GEN8_PPAT_WT); + intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write_fw(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(3), GEN8_PPAT_UC); + intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write_fw(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(4), GEN8_PPAT_WB); + intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write_fw(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(5), GEN8_PPAT_WB); + intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write_fw(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(6), GEN8_PPAT_WB); + intel_gt_mcr_multicast_write_fw(gt, XEHP_PAT_INDEX(7), GEN8_PPAT_WB); + intel_gt_mcr_unlock(gt, flags); + + intel_uncore_forcewake_put(gt->uncore, fw); } static void icl_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_uncore *uncore) -- 2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-30 15:59 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-11-28 23:30 [PATCH v2 0/5] i915: dedicated MCR locking and hardware semaphore Matt Roper 2022-11-28 23:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper 2022-11-28 23:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915/gt: Correct kerneldoc for intel_gt_mcr_wait_for_reg() Matt Roper 2022-11-28 23:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper 2022-11-30 15:42 ` Balasubramani Vivekanandan 2022-11-30 15:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Balasubramani Vivekanandan 2022-11-28 23:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915/gt: Pass gt rather than uncore to lowest-level reads/writes Matt Roper 2022-11-28 23:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper 2022-11-30 15:43 ` Balasubramani Vivekanandan 2022-11-30 15:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Balasubramani Vivekanandan 2022-11-28 23:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915/gt: Add dedicated MCR lock Matt Roper 2022-11-28 23:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper 2022-11-30 15:45 ` Balasubramani Vivekanandan 2022-11-30 15:45 ` [Intel-gfx] " Balasubramani Vivekanandan 2022-11-28 23:30 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915/mtl: Add hardware-level lock for steering Matt Roper 2022-11-28 23:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper 2022-12-02 14:46 ` Balasubramani Vivekanandan 2022-12-05 8:58 ` Tvrtko Ursulin 2022-12-05 15:52 ` Matt Roper 2022-12-05 18:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin 2022-11-28 23:30 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/i915/mtl: Hold forcewake and MCR lock over PPAT setup Matt Roper 2022-11-28 23:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper 2022-11-30 15:51 ` Balasubramani Vivekanandan 2022-11-30 15:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Balasubramani Vivekanandan 2022-11-30 15:58 ` Matt Roper [this message] 2022-11-30 15:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Matt Roper 2022-12-01 9:26 ` Balasubramani Vivekanandan 2022-12-01 9:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Balasubramani Vivekanandan 2022-12-01 21:01 ` Matt Roper 2022-12-01 21:01 ` Matt Roper 2022-11-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v2 " Matt Roper 2022-11-30 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper 2022-11-29 0:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for i915: dedicated MCR locking and hardware semaphore (rev2) Patchwork 2022-11-29 0:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2022-11-29 6:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork 2022-11-30 17:13 ` Matt Roper 2022-11-30 16:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for i915: dedicated MCR locking and hardware semaphore (rev3) Patchwork 2022-11-30 16:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork 2022-11-30 22:40 ` Matt Roper
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20221130155852.19601-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \ --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \ --cc=balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.