All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH] platform: Provide a remove callback that returns no value
Date: Fri,  9 Dec 2022 16:09:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221209150914.3557650-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> (raw)

struct platform_driver::remove returning an integer made driver authors
expect that returning an error code was proper error handling. However
the driver core ignores the error and continues to remove the device
because there is nothing the core could do anyhow and reentering the
remove callback again is only calling for trouble.

So this is an source for errors typically yielding resource leaks in the
error path.

As there are too many platform drivers to neatly convert them all to
return void in a single go, do it in several steps after this patch:

 a) Convert all drivers to implement .remove_new() returning void instead
    of .remove() returning int;
 b) Change struct platform_driver::remove() to return void and so make
    it identical to .remove_new();
 c) Change all drivers back to .remove() now with the better prototype;
 d) drop struct platform_driver::remove_new().

While this touches all drivers eventually twice, steps a) and c) can be
done one driver after another and so reduces coordination efforts
immensely and simplifies review.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
 drivers/base/platform.c         |  4 +++-
 include/linux/platform_device.h | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
index 968f3d71eeab..a4938d1c8fe1 100644
--- a/drivers/base/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
@@ -1416,7 +1416,9 @@ static void platform_remove(struct device *_dev)
 	struct platform_driver *drv = to_platform_driver(_dev->driver);
 	struct platform_device *dev = to_platform_device(_dev);
 
-	if (drv->remove) {
+	if (drv->remove_new) {
+		drv->remove_new(dev);
+	} else if (drv->remove) {
 		int ret = drv->remove(dev);
 
 		if (ret)
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_device.h b/include/linux/platform_device.h
index b0d5a253156e..b845fd83f429 100644
--- a/include/linux/platform_device.h
+++ b/include/linux/platform_device.h
@@ -207,7 +207,18 @@ extern void platform_device_put(struct platform_device *pdev);
 
 struct platform_driver {
 	int (*probe)(struct platform_device *);
+
+	/*
+	 * Traditionally the remove callback returned an int which however is
+	 * ignored by the driver core. This led to wrong expectations by driver
+	 * authors who thought returning an error code was a valid error
+	 * handling strategy. To convert to a callback returning void, new
+	 * drivers should implement .remove_new() until the conversion it done
+	 * that eventually makes .remove() return void.
+	 */
 	int (*remove)(struct platform_device *);
+	void (*remove_new)(struct platform_device *);
+
 	void (*shutdown)(struct platform_device *);
 	int (*suspend)(struct platform_device *, pm_message_t state);
 	int (*resume)(struct platform_device *);
-- 
2.38.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-12-09 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-09 15:09 Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2022-12-09 15:21 ` [PATCH] platform: Provide a remove callback that returns no value Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-12-09 15:52   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-12-09 16:15     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-12  8:20       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-01-13 11:43         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-13 17:40           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-01-17 18:05             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221209150914.3557650-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.