All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org, agross@kernel.org,
	andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: danny@kdrag0n.dev, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: correct dynamic power coefficients
Date: Fri,  6 Jan 2023 17:46:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230106164618.1845281-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> (raw)

While stressing EAS on my dragonboard RB3, I have noticed that LITTLE cores
where never selected as the most energy efficient CPU whatever the
utilization level of waking task.

energy model framework uses its cost field to estimate the energy with
the formula:

  nrg = cost of the selected OPP * utilization / CPU's max capacity

which ends up selecting the CPU with lowest cost / max capacity ration
as long as the utilization fits in the OPP's capacity.

If we compare the cost of a little OPP with similar capacity of a big OPP
like :
       OPP(kHz)   OPP capacity    cost     max capacity   cost/max capacity
LITTLE 1766400    407             351114   407            863
big    1056000    408             520267   1024           508

This can be interpreted as the LITTLE core consumes 70% more than big core
for the same compute capacity.

According to [1], LITTLE consumes 10% less than big core for Coremark
benchmark at those OPPs. If we consider that everything else stays
unchanged, the dynamic-power-coefficient of LITTLE core should be
only 53% of the current value: 290 * 53% = 154

Set the dynamic-power-coefficient of CPU0-3 to 154 to fix the energy model.

[1] https://github.com/kdrag0n/freqbench/tree/master/results/sdm845/main

Fixes: 0e0a8e35d725 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: correct dynamic power coefficients")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
index 65032b94b46d..869bdb9bce6e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ CPU0: cpu@0 {
 			reg = <0x0 0x0>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <611>;
-			dynamic-power-coefficient = <290>;
+			dynamic-power-coefficient = <154>;
 			qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
 			operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
 			interconnects = <&gladiator_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC 3 &mem_noc SLAVE_EBI1 3>,
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ CPU1: cpu@100 {
 			reg = <0x0 0x100>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <611>;
-			dynamic-power-coefficient = <290>;
+			dynamic-power-coefficient = <154>;
 			qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
 			operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
 			interconnects = <&gladiator_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC 3 &mem_noc SLAVE_EBI1 3>,
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ CPU2: cpu@200 {
 			reg = <0x0 0x200>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <611>;
-			dynamic-power-coefficient = <290>;
+			dynamic-power-coefficient = <154>;
 			qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
 			operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
 			interconnects = <&gladiator_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC 3 &mem_noc SLAVE_EBI1 3>,
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ CPU3: cpu@300 {
 			reg = <0x0 0x300>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <611>;
-			dynamic-power-coefficient = <290>;
+			dynamic-power-coefficient = <154>;
 			qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
 			operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
 			interconnects = <&gladiator_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC 3 &mem_noc SLAVE_EBI1 3>,
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-01-06 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-06 16:46 Vincent Guittot [this message]
2023-01-06 18:28 ` [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: correct dynamic power coefficients Bjorn Andersson
2023-01-09 17:02   ` Vincent Guittot
2023-01-18 23:26     ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-02-27  9:11       ` Vincent Guittot
2023-03-16  3:21 ` Bjorn Andersson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-06 16:45 Vincent Guittot
2023-01-06 16:43 Vincent Guittot
2022-03-15 14:11 Dmitry Baryshkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230106164618.1845281-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=danny@kdrag0n.dev \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.